Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 06-20-2008 3:32 PM by Anonymous Citizen. 8 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (9 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2007 House Bill 5525 (Mandate state power production decline )

    Introduced in the House on December 4, 2007, to mandate that electric utilities reduce the amount of energy they provide by 1 percent each year beginning in 2012, and gas utitities reduce production by 0.75 percent per year. To accomplish this they would be required to charge higher rates to pay for programs that “target customer behavior, equipment, or devices without reducing the amount or quality of energy services.” Utilities that fell short of the energy production reduction mandates could potentially be ordered by the Public Service Commission to reduce their prices. See also House Bill 5525, which caps competition between electricity providers in Michigan

    The vote was 81 in favor, 18 opposed and 11 not voting

    (House Roll Call 303 at House Journal 35)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 01-25-2008 1:55 PM In reply to

    PLEASE STOP!

    We cannot afford higher energy costs - they are already a substantial portion of our budget!!! Do not legislate the power companies allow them to use their money to come up with their own ideas - not to tax and spend and pass it on to the lowly consumer - your CONSTITUENTS!!! Isn't Michigan's economy in enough trouble - enough with the tax and spend ideas.
  • 01-25-2008 2:00 PM In reply to

    Sounds Alot Like

    capitalism. Get the government out of the way and watch things get better. "allow them to use their money to come up with their own ideas - not to tax and spend"
  • 01-25-2008 3:43 PM In reply to

    No More Socialist Government!

    Just what we need...another 'mandate'-to be funded by the taxpayer! What part of "We're broke" dont you understand? We all agree we need to cut consumption of oil and gas, however we need better prioritizing on the part of legislature: Michigan is already in dire economic straits and you want to raise the price of energy? How much business do you think that will encourage? This is NOT the year to start making reckless demands regarding fuel useage-a decent tax credit for the taxpayer to promote efficiency would go much further toward meeting these goals.
  • 01-25-2008 5:08 PM In reply to

    All you Idiots that voted for jenny. Thanks alot. We are in dire straights in Michigan but I heard she is going to talk about her plan to change our economy in her upcoming state of the state address. She is an absolute idiot...Next thing you know we will have another idiot {Clinton} in the White House. Idiots should not be allowed to Vote, lets make it a law.
  • 01-26-2008 1:35 PM In reply to

    About gas taxes - NO

    Hey moleface! When are you going to get with the fact that higher gas prices are killing the state economy, from car production to tourism? A new increase on gas taxes would essentially cripple what's left of the Michigan economy. but then again, moleface, I wish I hadn't voted for you. You were the lesser of two evils, but now looking back on it, I wish I had given DeVos a chance, or some other person but you. And I did not vote for Romney. The only person I have encountered in this year's presidential campaign who appeals to me as a very straightforward person is McCain. Ron Paul? I did seriously consider him, but felt he was a bit too radical for me. He did have some good ideas, though. I think before all is said and done, he will have a lot to say about who gets the Republican nomination. He just keeps hanging in there. The Democrats? To me, Hillary is another moleface. Since the Dems refused to campaign in Michigan, I could not vote for any of them, although I do like Obama. Choices, choices, choices. I want someone who has a long-term vision for where they want to take Michigan and the nation, not just someone who cannot see past their nose, or their moleface.
  • 01-26-2008 1:41 PM In reply to

    Oh by the way ...

    Moleface, if you really want to take a stand against the oil companies, how about doing what former President Carter tried to to (and should have been allowed to do), which is to pass a windfall profits tax on the oil companies, which would not be allowed to be passed onto consumers. The money from that tax would be used to support alternative fuel sources and alternative energy production. But then, moleface, you and your legislature are like a bunch of pigs at the public trough. You are all the worst bunch of incompetent, self-serving losers in state history.
  • 04-20-2008 12:05 PM In reply to

    "no vote explanation"

    Rep. Agema, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: We are again asking rate payers to cough up more money for their energy based on a government mandate.”
  • 06-20-2008 3:32 PM In reply to

    A step in the right direction for energy.

    2007 House Bill 5525 (Mandate state power production decline ) (House Roll Call 303) Passed in the House (81 to 18) on April 17, 2008, to mandate that electric utilities reduce the amount of energy they provide by 1 percent each year beginning in 2012, and gas utitities reduce production by 0.75 percent per year. To accomplish this they would be required to charge higher rates to pay for programs that “target customer behavior, equipment, or devices without reducing the amount or quality of energy services.” Utilities that fell short of the energy production reduction mandates could potentially be ordered by the Public Service Commission to reduce their prices. See also House Bill 5525, which caps competition between electricity providers in Michigan. [History, Amendments & Comments] The vote was 81 in favor, 18 opposed, and 11 not voting (House Roll Call 303 at House Journal 35) [Comment on this vote | View others' comments] Vote Support Oppose Not Voting Undecided Legislators (Democrat) 93% 0% 6% 58 total votes Legislators (Republican) 51% 34% 13% 52 total votes Voters 100% 0% 0% 1 total vote What do you think? Support Oppose Undecided (logon required) The following legislators supported 2007 House Bill 5525 (Mandate state power production decline ): Accavitti (D) Angerer (D) Ball (R) Bauer (D) Bieda (D) Booher (R) Brown (D) Byrnes (D) Byrum (D) Calley (R) Caswell (R) Caul (R) Cheeks (D) Clack (D) Clemente (D) Condino (D) Constan (D) Corriveau (D) Coulouris (D) Cushingberry (D) Dean (D) Dillon (D) Donigan (D) Ebli (D) Farrah (D) Gillard (D) Gonzales (D) Griffin (D) Hammel (D) Hammon (D) Hansen (R) Hildenbrand (R) Hood (D) Hopgood (D) Horn (R) Hune (R) Johnson (D) Jones, Rick (R) Jones, Robert (D) Knollenberg (R) Lahti (D) LaJoy (R) Law, David (R) Law, Kathleen (D) LeBlanc (D) Leland (D) Lemmons (D) Lindberg (D) Marleau (R) Mayes (D) McDowell (D) Meadows (D) Meisner (D) Melton (D) Meltzer (R) Miller (D) Moore (R) Moss (R) Nofs (R) Opsommer (R) Palsrok (R) Pastor (R) Pearce (R) Polidori (D) Proos (R) Rocca (R) Sak (D) Shaffer (R) Sheltrown (D) Simpson (D) Smith, Alma (D) Smith, Virgil (D) Spade (D) Tobocman (D) Vagnozzi (D) Valentine (D) Walker (R) Ward (R) Warren (D) Wojno (D) Young (D) The following legislators opposed 2007 House Bill 5525 (Mandate state power production decline ): Acciavatti (R) Agema (R) Casperson (R) DeRoche (R) Elsenheimer (R) Emmons (R) Green (R) Huizenga (R) Meekhof (R) Moolenaar (R) Nitz (R) Pavlov (R) Robertson (R) Schuitmaker (R) Stahl (R) Stakoe (R) Steil (R) Wenke (R) The following legislators did not vote on 2007 House Bill 5525 (Mandate state power production decline ): Amos (R) Bennett (D) Brandenburg (R) Espinoza (D) Gaffney (R) Garfield (R) Hoogendyk (R) Jackson (D) Palmer (R) Scott (D) Sheen (R)
Page 1 of 1 (9 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems