Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 10-17-2008 8:48 AM by Anonymous Citizen. 6 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (7 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2007 House Bill 5467 (Establish registration category for street rods and custom vehicles )

    Introduced in the House on November 27, 2007, to define and authorize a separate registration category for street rods and custom vehicles, which would include certain vehicles over 25 years old owned solely as a collector's item and which are not used for general daily transportation, but only for occasional transportation, exhibitions, club activities, parades, tours, and similar use. The cars would be exempt from certain vehicle regulations, but would have to meet safety standards developed by the street rod and custom vehicle communities and acceptable to the Secretary of State. They would be subject to the same flat $30 annual registration fee that “historic vehicles” must pay under current law

    The vote was 107 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 not voting

    (House Roll Call 105 at House Journal 19)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 02-20-2008 6:16 PM In reply to

    2007 House Bill 5467

    I have a 33 year old car that is registered as Original Plate Non-Expiring. I paid for this registration years ago and will not pay $100 more to the State of michigan under this Bill. What can they do if I already have this registration? If this bill is passed it should apply to vehicles registered after it's effective date
  • 03-01-2008 9:37 AM In reply to

    HB5467

    Does this include motorcycles?
  • 10-15-2008 2:36 PM In reply to

    this bill applies to custom built

    This bill is explicitly written for custom built vehicles and should not change your current or new registration of a production built classic or antique vehicle. I have two vehicles registered similarly as the above poster. Example - This bill relates to someone who would build a 69 Camaro clone using a Dynacorn replacement body / chassis. If you are registering an original 69 Camaro with a Chevrolet VIN this bill does not apply to you.
  • 10-16-2008 1:52 PM In reply to

    the question is

    why? why have a 'special' category for 'custom' custom cars unless you plan on taxing them at a higher (different)rate? this is unfair and unnecesary. folk are alredy registeringa their vehicles, so no 'enforcement' issues exist, they are legally driving them, so no 'hazards' exist. the vehicles are not 'unsafe' per se, so no 'safety' issues exist. there is no other reason, other than to pay lansing more money to pass this bill.

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 10-17-2008 8:29 AM In reply to

    Man, It's good to have you back

    You are right. This law will raise the "fees" for these "special" vehicles because everybody knows that only the evil rich own these things. A good dem/socialist will always seek to punish success. This will give the behemouth state slug more money with which to buy votes from idiots.
  • 10-17-2008 8:48 AM In reply to

    Clarifying Street-rod Titles, Cutting Registration Tax

    This bill has been changed quite a bit since introduction, and its defects have been remedied. It clarifies the issuing of titles for street rods, custom cars, and most especially kit and replica cars. It also allows these cars to be registered, at the owner's option, in the same manner as historic vehicles, and at the same price: $30 for 10 years. Such registrations are usable only for parades, shows, and car-club and similar events. This is a massive discount from usual registration taxes which are around a third of a percent of the new-vehicle price per year. If a kit-car owner wishes to use his vehicle for daily transportation, he or she may buy an ordinary plate at the usual price. This was not possible under this bill as introduced. I don't know why SEMA did not see that this bill was written properly at introduction, but as far as I can see, it's okay now. Kit-car and street-rod builders should make sure the Senate passes this before December.
Page 1 of 1 (7 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems