|
Latest post 01-27-2010 2:11 PM by geovs20. 144 replies.
-
01-01-2001 12:00 AM
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Get Going on Repealing the Traffic-ticket Tax
This bill is the first Democrat-sponsored bill to repeal the disastrous Michigan Driver Responsibility Act, and the first such Senate bill. Transportation Committee Chair Jud Gilbert should waste no time in reporting this bill. Both parties share blame for this unfair law, and both should join in repealing it immediately.
Unlike the Democratic House bills, this bill would repeal the convictions surtaxes and points tax completely, and I hope it means that the party of the Governor is at last willing to admit that these surtaxes are a worse problem than any budget situation the state finds itself in.
With this bill, the legislature is admitting that the Driver Responsibility Act is dangerous and unjust. Unfortunately, the repeal bills (SB 638 and HB 4006) do nothing to address the problem of unpaid taxes, which must now be approaching a third of a billion dollars. The number of citizens (and their families) legally immobilized by suspended licenses under this law may be approaching 100,000. Certainly it is over 50,000 - the state has not revealed the numbers. These people will remain unproductive outlaws indefinitely unless the unpaid taxes under this law are forgiven. The state really has no choice in this matter.
If the legislature feels that an amnesty is unfair to the people who have paid these taxes, a solution is available: just refund all these unjust taxes.
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
A regressive tax from the Lansing looters.
Mirs, 12/13/06
Bad Driver Act Lamented As 'Regressive Tax'
It was all about generating revenues for state government, and, in the end, all it does is penalize those least able to pay.
That was the message today from four different judges who came to testify before a House Transportation Subcommittee on the negative impact of the state's three-year-old Driver Responsibility Act, known as the "bad driver fees."
For certain offenses, the state started assessing extra fines some three years ago — although many believe the fees moved through the Legislature as a way to generate more revenue for a sagging state budget than encourage responsible driving.
Van Buren County Judge William BUHL argued that the Bad Driver Act is "a damaging tax" and that it has had little impact on improving driving, but rather penalizes those who are least able to pay.
"This legislation isn't about highway safety," Buhl said in prepared testimony. "It's a sin tax, plain and simple. Look at the timing of this legislation. That pretty much tells the story. A fiscal analysis from June 2003 by the House Fiscal Agency estimated net revenues at $76,653,920. Included in that analysis was the estimate that the collection rate would be 60 percent. Collection costs were estimated at 12.3 percent."
Buhl told the story of one resident who was working a low-paying job and was assessed a bad driver fee. Ultimately, she wound up bouncing a check for her rent and was at risk of losing her home because the state was going so hard after the $1,000 or more in fees she racked up.
Karen DePRIEST, a single-mother from West Michigan, testified that she'd gotten a speeding ticket. At the time, her mother was helping her by handling bills. She thought her mother had paid the speeding ticket. Her mother thought she had.
Several months later she was pulled over for driving on a suspended license for fees unpaid.
"There is no leniency," a tearful DePriest testified. "They won't give me a payment plan. They won't reinstate my license."
DePriest said she's secured a good-paying job in Grand Rapids as a kitchen and bath design consultant, but can't work because she doesn't have the money to pay down the bad driver fees which at one point had reached $6,000.
In story after story, the panel heard of people who hadn't been repeated drunk-drivers, but had the misfortune of falling into the Driver Responsibility fee system. Complicating the matter is that many folks had moved, resulting in notices from the state going unanswered before licenses were summarily suspended.
DePriest and others testified that, in the end, they wound up having to travel to one local office for the traffic fee, back to the Secretary of State's office and then sometimes on to the Department of Treasury.
"That's not making us a very productive society when people have to take time off work to go to three places to pay off fees," noted Judge Michael GEROU, of the 35th District Court.
On two occasions, Rep. Tom CASPERSON (R-Escanaba) apologized to those testifying.
"I want to apologize to you," Casperson said. "The fee is bad enough, but for people to have to go through hoops . . . our government should be more responsive."
Judge Buhl argued that the state is making criminals out of non-criminals.
"This is a bill that gets short term revenues for long-term damages," said Buhl. "We're making poor people poorer."
Judge Brian OAKLEY, from the 34th District Court, indicated that the Michigan District Judges Association opposed the package because it's a tax, not a fee.
Oakley told the panel that those residents least able to pay the bad driver fee are the least able to avoid it. In other words, where he or a member of the panel may hire a lawyer to deal with a bad ticket or driving situation others who couldn't afford an attorney could get tangled up in the process.
"The people out there who are getting hammered are folks that get five over," said Oakley. "They can't pay the $100 so they don't want to come to court." Not appearing in court just begins a spiral that the Driver Responsibility Act fees perpetuate.
Rep. Tom PEARCE (R-Rockford), who chaired the House Transportation Subcommittee on Driver Responsibility, began today's hearing by noting that the state has collected $163.8 million in fees while it has assessed more than $387 million. - (That's 42.3 percent, not "60 percent.")
At the end of the hearing, Pearce told those assembled that because of the end of the 93rd Legislature this week and the beginning in January of the 94th, it would be a while before the issue is addressed, but it's one he does want to see addressed.
"With all the testimony we've heard, and all the issue we've heard from constituents all around the state, I do think this bill needs to be repealed," Pearce told MIRS following the hearing. "I'm waiting to make a final decision on what I might write as a bill until I hear from the Departments because they weren't able to testify today."
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Virginia Rebels Against Traffic-ticket Tax
Today (July 19, `07) the Speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates will hold a press release to try to defend that state's "abusive driver penalties." This event will probably not go well for him. These so-called "remedial fees" are Virginia's version of Michigan's Driver Responsibility Act, and were enacted only a few weeks ago. Unlike Michigan drivers, Virginia citizens wasted no time in attempting to overturn the blatant money-grubbing scheme. The Virginia law is being challenged by powerful lawyers on grounds of undue harshness and lack of relation of the "remedial fee" to any real remedy. An on-line petition, in which signatories promise never to vote for a supporter of the law, has attracted 130,000 electronic signatures so far, equal to 3 per cent of Virginia's voters.
Each state that copies this bad idea seems to add a perverse detail of its own. In Michigan, it is a $1,000 fine for failure to have insurance. In Virginia, it is speeding fines that can reach $3,550 for only 20 mph over Virginia's frequently-underposted speed limits. But all states (NJ, TX, MI, VA) seem to love the $1,000 fines for operating while under license suspension, that generates the cycle of hopelessness that our judges see in court every day.
Michigan legislators need to see what's happening in our district courts, and in Virginia. They need to repeal this law immediately, and then clean up after themselves by granting amnesty for unpaid ticket taxes.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
And hopefully this is in response to the pending lawsuit in the supreme court by Henry Guikema.
Court of appeals no. 264103
Docket No. 133761
But I still think gov. goober won't budge because she's stupid canadian white trash. Her and her ilk should be put in prison for passing this law. They're well behaved people, for murderers. Same goes for the legislators in the trash dump state of NJ where this all started.
I can guess these people didn't like having to give bold faced lies on the evening news to Anne Schieber on how they passed this law to remove drunks from the road, and then say "oh, I'm sorry for my stupidity, I'll support a repeal." You SHIT HEADS were warned by judges and your own fellow lawmakers that this was a bad idea, and probably illegal, and the kinds of problems it would create. You didn't listen or care. Now it's off to prison for you for perjury(if this ever goes to trial) and false pretenses in creating a law that puts money into a fund for you to spend on personal bureaucratic gluttony.
VA voters have more balls and intelligence apparently than the inept, out of touch peons of MI. Same is said for the national media for not covering this story or doing investigative reporting. Screw you CNN, 20/20, Dateline NBC, Associated Press. Continue on your fucking war and paris hilton reporting because that's all you're competent to do, the easy news no one gives a fleas tight ass about. You're too stupid to understand legal matter reports. You can go suck on a mummified Pharaohs testicle.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
2007 Senate Bill 638 (Repeal driver responsibility fees )
blow more smoke up my ash please this is bull nothing will happen with this but more drf
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
yeah we'll just see about this
look people, the fact of the matter is we have no control over what the government does. This is not a good thing. I wish i could say i was an innocent victim of this "fee" but the fact is that on january 24th of 2004 after breaking up with a girlfriend of four years I went out drinking. after being pulled over and passing and the roadside sobriety tests a block from my house after being followed for nearly three miles i was asked to take a pbt or roadside breath test. I asked the officer why after passing all his other tests and he Then said that my eyes were shaking during the test. I wasn't wasted I knew exactly what was going on, and in hindsight i should have refused the pbt, i would have been better to make the officer rely on his own judgement as to wether or not to arrest me rather than rely on this inadmissable evidence. I blew a .10 after he told me that he would let me go if i blew the legal limit or below. At witch point i said cool thats the legal limit right? to witch he replied yeah a few months back... as i was unaware that the new legal limit was .08.... damn.. so here i sit three years and some months later still without a license, am i mad? not really, yeah being able to drive is my one true passion, but i must admit after adjusting where I live to acomidate where i work i hasn't been all bad, i feel for those who get caught up in this system as i did but they have to realize that the cards are stacked against them from the beginning and that most people in politics only care about their families and your vote. they could care less what kind of financial hardships you are going through. the only hope here is that this law b found illegal somehow. you people have to stay informed about your canidates.. this comining from someone who at one time voted for jenn g as the lesser of two evils. I would love to get a check for two thousnd dollars back from the state but i wont hold my breath.. In the meantime i will ride a bike in the summer and walk in the winter. I figure i have saved at least two g-s in insurance, gas, and car payments. this has been a life altering experience for me and i will never again get behind the wheel of a car after drinking. so i guess it has done some good.
|
|
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Illegal, unconstitutional TAX!
That idiot Granholm should be held accountable for ruining this economy. Imposing these unconstiutional, taxes on the citizens should be ILLEGAL. Way to stick it to the working man Granholm, you truly are the shining example of idiocy in government.
We, the citizens, owe it to ourselves and future generations to HOLD GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE! If we fail, then insane, idiots like mole faced Granholm will continue to ram these illegal scams down our throats. This is classic nazi gestapo tactics at work, you simply cannot live without a driver license. This is how they control you, by taking your driving "privilege" away with these stupid, ridiculous, excessive "fees".
This is OUR government, they work for US. WE give them the power, and WE can take it away. We need to hold these people accountable, the legislators, the judges, and the idiots in the executive branch.
And anyone who voted for that idiot, piece of human waste Granholm, owes EVERYONE an apology.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Froze Husbands bank account
In Nov. of 2005 I got a DUI. I admit that I had a few beers at the restaurant and I know I probably shouldn't have been driving. It was raining and when I turned the corner exiting the highway, my car slipped a little and I nearly hit a curb. It was cold out and I think the ice on the roads had a bit to do with it.
$2000 for the lawyer. $2000 in fines in court. $1500 for the increase in insurance (I'm 32 and this was my very first ticket). Year 1, $1000 for a driver responsibility fee. Year 2, $1000 for a driver responsibility fee. I missed my July payment this year. We just don't have the money. Then in August, I receive a letter stating that I have until August 29th to resolve the payment missed or they will suspend my license. I had just deposited the check to pay the fine online via EFT yesterday. Then last night we log in to HIS bank account to pay a few bills. "I AM NOT ON THE ACCOUNT" only to find that they have frozen the account and placed a levy against the $370 in it. This morning we find three bounced checks and $75 in fines for those.
Looks like we are headed straight down into a pit of financial trouble over this and we have no idea what to do.
Can they freeze his account for my driver responsibility fee?
Why didn't they send some type of notice that they were going to do this?
If you know of any information that might help, please let us know.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
The Washington Post is not
against us at least. Since they did publish a story with the information and contacts I gave them here in MI.
They published a story on VA new driver fee law with commentary by MI Judge Buhl and Rep. Pierce on how OUR law and the one in NJ is a failure and so will theirs be.
I hope Judge Buhl is enjoying his extra 15 min of fame that I gave him, since I saw his name in a later separate editorial for another news agency in addition to the earlier WA post one. Because it seems none of the big guns want to touch on MI issue because we haven't made such a big outcry like VA citizens have.
Notice how CNN only VIDEO reported a story the AP did, on that obese VA woman who got a $1,050 reckless driving fine because she was speeding to the hospital claiming labor pains? I guess you can only get hardship cases on the news nowadays. Trust me, I tried all of them before submitting my story to the WA post.
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/23/AR2007072301631.html
Seems the legislature in VA is just as brain dead as they are here. At least they're fighting and hopefully a blow for justice will be served with all these pending lawsuits. The verdict of which WE might be able to use to have ours thrown out, since I doubt Henry Guikemas brief in the supreme court of MI will win.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
jmiller


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Drivers Responsibility Fees
Hello,
My name is Janet Miller and in 2004 I got arrested for a DUI, which I had paid my fines and court costs, but on top of that I got 1000.00 in drivers responsibility fees that at first I could not pay, I was a student in a medical administrative class and was not working, by time I started working at a job that I could afford the fees another 1000.00 was tacked on plus an additional 500.00 because I was unable to pay, i have a fairly good job now and have paid a few payments and now have the garnished from my check which I have no problem with, the problem I have now is I usually get rides back and forth to work, well one day last week my ride called and said she couldn't make it because her car broke down, we have a old car he that is insured and licensed, so i decided to drive it to work so I didn't miss a day but low and behold got pulled over on my way to work which is 4 miles one way, because my muffler was to loud. Needless to say I got a ticket for driving on a suspended license. So i will have to pay that ticket and the responsibilty fees that will come along with it, also I am still on probation and may be facing jail time just because I needed a way to work. I am trying my best to do whats right paying my bills and fees and still trying to keep my job, I am in such a spot that I don't know what to do or who to talk to I have a 7 year old daughhter, that is in soccer and Girl Scouts and I am also her Girl Scout leader, how is one to manage if I can't get my license back until my fees are paid and can't pay my fees if I can't make it to work unless I rely on other people. Like I said i have no problem paying the fees as it was I who made the mistake of drinking and driving but it will take me atleast another three years to pay off these fees at 100.00 a month that I am paying. If i knew anyone that had that kind of money I would have borrowed it along time ago to pay this off but I come from a family that struggels as it is and are in no position to help me out at this time. Please let me know who I am able to talk to about this situation, most everyone i know has had some sort of drivers responsibility fee against them since this law was passed. How does Michigan expect people to keep there jobs if they don't have licenses to get there.
Thank You
Janet Miller
madchiller6972@yahoo.com
|
|
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
first off, f&*k the state of michigan, f&*k them dead in their ear! maybe then they will listen. This law has hurt more people than anyone will ever realize. I moved to arizona over 2 years ago. Relinquished my state citizenship by obtaining an Arizona state id, and yes i said state id, because michigan stole my driving privileges, flat out stole them, but on to my point. I am a resident of the state of arizona, registered to vote here, have an address and bills coming to my house in my name, so id say i have pretty much established residency here. But for some odd reason i am still required to pay a reinstatment fee to a state that i no longer live in, and that i will not be renewing my license in. My license is suspended currently in the state of michigan for failure to pay my driver responsibility fee. Mind you, i have never had a dui, possession of drugs, an accident, a speeding ticket, reckless driving, none of em. I got hit for a seatbelt ticket and no proof of insurance. i had insurance and showed proof to the court yet i still have to pay a d.r.f. regardless of the fact that i was not guilty. My license has been suspended for going on 3 years now, and will probably remain suspended for some time because i have refused and will continue to refuse to let this state rip me off. I am half tempted to come back to michigan and get residency back, and file for welfare. Once i get said welfare i will promptly move back to arizona and obtain student residency, which is effectively dual residency in both michigan and arizona. Then i just sit and collect all my michigan welfare checks and reside in the beautiful sunny state of arizona. Lets see how the lawmakers react when i send them an itemized breakdown of how much money i have bilked from them over the years in welfare. I bet their tunes would change when they see that just because they got greedy and wanted to flat out rip off the residents of the state of michigan, that a citizen figured out a way to get over on them and reap 40 or 50 thousand dollars in welfare, all because they wanted to steal 1000 dollars from me. i bet they would shove their heads up their own rose smelling asses. So i say once again, F&*K MICHIGAN, F&*K THEM IN THEIR DAMNED EAR!!!!
|
|
|
|
|