Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 06-20-2008 5:30 PM by Anonymous Citizen. 9 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (10 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2007 House Bill 4486 (Revise local and county solid waste plan law )

    Introduced in the House on March 20, 2007, to revise the system of county and local solid waste planning so as to specify and require certain additional procedures and state reviews related to future landfill space and planning. Specifically, the bill would require an annual report from landfill owners or operators and counties regarding landfill capacity; require counties to update solid waste plans every five years; eliminate an exemption from a requirement that a county must have a solid waste plan that identifies a new landfill site if it can identify sufficient disposal capacity for its needs within 150 miles, and more. The bill would allow two or more counties to create a single solid waste management plan. It would also expand Department of Environmental Quality rulemaking authority in this area

    The vote was 64 in favor, 45 opposed and 1 not voting

    (House Roll Call 142 at House Journal 43)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 03-22-2007 6:45 AM In reply to

    Excellent forethought! Al Gore rocks, too!

    The Democratic Field: Who's In, Who's Out Blogging 2008: Latest Buzz on the Contenders "Global warming science is uneven and evolving," Barton said. Gore insisted that the link is beyond dispute and is the source of broad agreement in the scientific community. "The planet has a fever," Gore said. "If your baby has a fever, you go to the doctor. If the doctor says you need to intervene here, you don't say, 'Well, I read a science fiction novel that told me it's not a problem.' If the crib's on fire, you don't speculate that the baby is flame retardant. You take action." Gore's congressional testimony marked the first time he had been to Capitol Hill since January 2001, when he was the defeated Democratic presidential nominee still presiding over the Senate in his role as vice president. It comes 20 years after Gore, then a congressman from Tennessee, held the first hearings in Congress on global warming. It also brought him face-to-face with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who could have her front-runner status threatened if Gore decided to challenge her for the party nomination. But there was no political fireworks between them at the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing. Clinton said she found some of Gore's ideas "extremely intriguing" and asked for more details on proposals such as a carbon-based tax, a cap-and-trade system and a carbon neutral mortgage association. In a day of testimony, Gore first appeared before a joint hearing by two House committees, with his wife, Tipper, sitting behind him and a stack of boxes beside him containing hundreds of thousands of messages asking Congress to act on global warming. Later, he testified before the Senate panel where partisan bickering grew even louder. Republican Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, who has labeled global warming a hoax, complained that the Democratic leadership gave Gore extra time and advantages not afforded typical witnesses. Inhofe then grilled Gore about his personal energy use at his Tennessee mansion and showed the final frame of Gore's film that read, "Are you ready to change the way you live?" When Gore tried to respond at length, Inhofe cut him off. Democratic Chairwoman Barbara Boxer kept trying to bring order to the hearing. She told Inhofe he can't control things anymore now that Republicans have lost their majority. "Elections have consequences, so I make the rules," she said, holding up her gavel to cheers from the audience. Gore sighed heavily and proposed that he and Inhofe have breakfast and privately discuss it away from the cameras. Gore said he hopes whoever is elected president in 2008 "can use his or her political chips" to lead the world toward a new global climate treaty to replace the 1997 Kyoto protocol that requires 35 industrial nations to cut greenhouse gases. The Bush administration argues Kyoto would hurt the U.S. economy and objects that high-polluting developing nations like China and India are not required to reduce emissions. "I fully understand that Kyoto, as a brand if you will, has been demonized," Gore said. Gore was warmly welcomed back by some of his critics, such as Rep. Ralph Hall, R-Texas, who remembered serving with Gore's father and bantered with Gore about an evening boat ride they took together. "You're dear to us, but I just don't agree with you on this," Hall said. Gore advised lawmakers to cut carbon dioxide and other warming gases 90 percent by 2050 to avoid a crisis. Doing that, he said, will require a ban on any new coal-burning power plants - a major source of industrial carbon dioxide - that lack state-of-the-art controls to capture the gases. He said he foresees a revolution in small-scale electricity producers for replacing coal, likening the development to what the Internet has done for the exchange of information. "There is a sense of hope in this country that this United States Congress will rise to the occasion and present meaningful solutions to this crisis," Gore said. "Our world faces a true planetary emergency. I know the phrase sounds shrill, and I know it's a challenge to the moral imagination." Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL. 2007-03-21 10:50:20
  • 03-22-2007 6:45 AM In reply to

    Go GORE! About time.

    Finally.
  • 03-22-2007 7:20 AM In reply to

    Algore

    is a bufoon. The majority of scientists that DO NOT recieve any money one way or the other believe that the extremely slight warming that has been talked about is totally natural since the earth has been heating or cooling for millions of years. Anyone that believes that humans can change the temp of earth also believe that if we all jump up and down at the same time we can change the rotation. Why do they leave out some data? Why did the free press write about the warmest winter in 112 years? Because if you go back beyond 113 years you find four or five warmer ones. Why don't their models work? Why do they want to control you and I? Because thats what libs/socialists do. One more thought, if they say the temp has increased about 1 degree f. do you really think that thermometers were that accurate in the year 1900? Have you ever tried to keep your house temp within 1 degree? It ain't gonna happen. The sun is warming us and I for one like it...might even help offset two penny jenny's plan to destroy the state. I don't understand how anyone can take this guy seriously...by the way, did you know he was the guy that invented the internet?
  • 03-24-2007 4:27 PM In reply to

    Green is HOT! Global Warming is NOT!

    Neither are landfills.
  • 03-24-2007 4:28 PM In reply to

    Al is my hero! I'd vote for him.

    Do you think he's bloodline, like in that one book? Is he French?
  • 05-04-2007 12:20 PM In reply to

    Rep. Stahl's "no vote explanation"

    Rep. Stahl, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: "Mr. Speaker and members of the House: this legislation will allow mandates to counties not desiring to open new landfills this is taking away local control and given state jurisdiction in local matters, allowing the DEQ to pick and choose in which would be a conflict of interest."
  • 05-04-2007 12:21 PM In reply to

    Rep. Hoogendyk's "no vote explanation"

    Rep. Hoogendyk, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: "Mr. Speaker and members of the House: Regarding passage of 4047, 4485, 4486. The trash industry is already heavily regulated. They have operated within the current regulatory framework. This act would violate private property laws by allowing DEQ officers to enter private property without notice, whenever they desire. This act could have a severe negative impact on current contracts with counties and cost counties a great deal of extra money. Provisions in the bill could lead to more landfills being sited in Michigan leading to an actual increase in out-of-state trash coming into the state. These bills undermine local authority and would lead to much higher prices for trash disposal. Many current projects could be compromised and the fees that end up going to infrastructure, parks and public safety could also be curtailed. Meanwhile, the real issue, importation of Canadian trash would not be addressed."
  • 06-20-2008 5:29 PM In reply to

    How come this got ditched in committee? Grrr.

    What happened?
  • 06-20-2008 5:30 PM In reply to

    ???????????

    2007 House Bill 4486 (Revise local and county solid waste plan law ) (House Roll Call 142) Passed in the House (64 to 45) on May 3, 2007. [History, Amendments & Comments] The vote was 64 in favor, 45 opposed, and 1 not voting (House Roll Call 142 at House Journal 43) [Comment on this vote | View others' comments] Vote Support Oppose Not Voting Undecided Legislators (Democrat) 96% 1% 1% 58 total votes Legislators (Republican) 15% 84% 0% 52 total votes What do you think? Support Oppose Undecided (logon required) The following legislators supported 2007 House Bill 4486 (Revise local and county solid waste plan law ): Accavitti (D) Angerer (D) Bauer (D) Bennett (D) Bieda (D) Brandenburg (R) Brown (D) Byrnes (D) Byrum (D) Casperson (R) Cheeks (D) Clack (D) Condino (D) Constan (D) Corriveau (D) Coulouris (D) Cushingberry (D) Dean (D) DeRoche (R) Dillon (D) Donigan (D) Ebli (D) Espinoza (D) Farrah (D) Gaffney (R) Gillard (D) Gonzales (D) Hammel (D) Hammon (D) Hood (D) Hopgood (D) Jackson (D) Johnson (D) Jones, Robert (D) Lahti (D) Law, David (R) Law, Kathleen (D) LeBlanc (D) Leland (D) Lemmons (D) Lindberg (D) Marleau (R) Mayes (D) McDowell (D) Meadows (D) Meisner (D) Melton (D) Miller (D) Polidori (D) Rocca (R) Sak (D) Scott (D) Sheltrown (D) Simpson (D) Smith, Alma (D) Smith, Virgil (D) Spade (D) Tobocman (D) Vagnozzi (D) Valentine (D) Ward (R) Warren (D) Wojno (D) Young (D) The following legislators opposed 2007 House Bill 4486 (Revise local and county solid waste plan law ): Acciavatti (R) Agema (R) Amos (R) Ball (R) Booher (R) Calley (R) Caswell (R) Caul (R) Elsenheimer (R) Emmons (R) Garfield (R) Green (R) Griffin (D) Hansen (R) Hildenbrand (R) Hoogendyk (R) Horn (R) Huizenga (R) Hune (R) Jones, Rick (R) Knollenberg (R) LaJoy (R) Meekhof (R) Meltzer (R) Moolenaar (R) Moore (R) Moss (R) Nitz (R) Nofs (R) Opsommer (R) Palmer (R) Palsrok (R) Pastor (R) Pavlov (R) Pearce (R) Proos (R) Robertson (R) Schuitmaker (R) Shaffer (R) Sheen (R) Stahl (R) Stakoe (R) Steil (R) Walker (R) Wenke (R) The following legislators did not vote on 2007 House Bill 4486 (Revise local and county solid waste plan law ): Clemente (D)
Page 1 of 1 (10 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems