|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Dear Curtis of Elmira, MI
You wote:
>And to the walkers, there are plenty of places that you can walk in the wilderness that a orv cannot drive down.<
Maybe this is so in other, more enlightened states. But not in Michigan. ORVs are virtually everywhere here. They are nearly impossible to get away from.
>Try walking off the beaten path.<
I don’t try it.
I do it, and have done so for more than 50 years. Michigan is a Hell-hole for people who want to enjoy quiet pursuits in the out-of-doors. That’s why most of my recreation dollars get spent, unfortunately, outside of Michigan even though I am a 40-year resident of the state.
|
|
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
What are you talking about?
Where exactly are you walking. I live in Grand Traverse County and walk the woods while hunting and fishing on a regular basis and in my 20 years in the area have NEVER seen a ORV out in the middle of the woods period. You might hear some engine noise if you are near the trails on the weekends but more often you will hear a chain saw.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tom Morrison


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
It took me a long time to read all of the comments and get to the bottom.
My first though is that it seems that everyone could post their opinion with out name calling.
For myself it seems that I fall into many of the categories; I'm almost 50, so I guess that I am getting close to the old folks. I like water with a lemon. I live in South Eastern Michigan. I pay my taxes and I always make sure we have current licenses and/or orv stickers.
So I guess this means I'm a Michigander. Because of this I feel I can add my thoughs.
The first is please don't lump everyone together either as all good or all bad.
My son and I ride the ORV trails 6 - 8 times a year. There are times when we have been lost, it just happens.
There are times when we have rode "off" of the trail, mostly to get around an obstacle, and we always bring out what we brought it (any good Cub Scout does this).
We ride with the Cycle Conservation Club and on our own. When we are with the CCC they pay for fees and use permits, post and remove trail markings and put a huge effort into maintaining the trials and good relationship with the local communities.
When we ride by ourselves we like to ride in Ogema County. Why? Because when a 10-11 year old tells you he's tired, it's time to get off of the trial. Otherwise, someone gets hurt.
Then we ride on the shoulder. We try to ride at 20 MPH, which can be hard without a speedo, but we try. There is no way that we add any additional strain to the road or road system. Any road that was designed to stand up to truck travel can support a 300 pound bike and rider.
In fact most off-road trail riders don't want to ride on the road because it tears up the tires and certainly isn't much fun.
The merchants I meet in Rose City and adjoining areas tell me that this is a huge benefit to there business. Other areas when we ask tell me they wish it was the same.
There will always be a few that feel that their rights come first and there's not much you can do to change that. But the truth is for everyone to have these rights means we have to extend them to each other.
I hope the bill passes, it benefits me of couse, but I think that it benefits many.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Good Advice For ORVers, Too
The ORV rider who complains bitterly about hikers and others being in the woods on “his” trails then shouts at the world:
>LEARN TO SHARE PEOPLE. Is that not what you teach you kids?<
It actually is good advice. ORV riders should absorb some of it.
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Sharing? Trail Vandalism? Trail Economics?
The ORV fan posts:
>Power sport riders have always had to share the trails with cars and trucks<
I don’t think that is so, at all. I see numerous miles of designated Michigan ORV-ATV-Motorcycle-Snowmobile trail marked off-limits to ordinary motor vehicles.
Actually, what this bill is about is forcing conventional motorists to give up road right-of-way space to ORVs.
>I have seen a couple on the snowmobile trail just south of Wolverine spreading salt on the snowmobile trail.<
The complaints about people vandalizing snowmobile trails are legitimate. It should not happen, and the vandals should be dealt with to the full extent the law allows.
But the truth most certainly is that far more non-motorized trail mileage gets damaged -- vandalized -- by motorsports fans going where they are not supposed to be than the other way around. I see evidence of ATV-ORV-Motorcycle traffic on Michigan’s non-motorized trails all the time. It comes in the form of trail-widening, torn-up treadway, mud-holing, torn up waterbars, and slope erosion accompanied by the signature tire tracks of the vehicles that did the damage.
I never see hikers on motorsports trails, even though it may be legal for pedestrians to be there. Of course, as a hiker I avoid walking on motorsports trails like the plague because hiking with mechanized vehicles roaring past in close quarters is simply not any fun for me.
>And to the guy that said he would take his hiking dollars elsewhere. Go ahead, we will not miss your 2 bucks.<
Jeez, Buster, what happened to that “sharing” attitude you were preaching a while back? Oh, I get it: When you preach “sharing,” what you really mean is, “give me whatever I want and to Hell with whatever anybody else wants.” Very generous of you.
And, as it happens, I am the guy who takes his hiking dollars out of Michigan. This past summer alone that amounted to nearly $3,000 dropped on the local economies in hiking areas of New York State and New England. So don’t give us this $2 garbage.
I also buy hunting and fishing licenses, and pay taxes in Michigan.
Sure, my hiking bucks won’t cure Michigan’s economic woes. But then, I am not the only hiker who lives in Michigan. Hikers eat, drink, buy fuel and do almost all the same economy-boosting things the motorsports folks do. They just don’t make a huge noise and tear up the landscape while doing it, and so are relatively less visible.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
I just found this on the web; 10/30/07 LETS get this BILL MOVING again! As of 1/1/07 we have over 346,000 ATV's in Michigan that's a lot of voices that will overtake all the naysayers.
INSIDE MICHIGAN HOUSE BILL 4323
Starting with latest to oldest
10/12/07
Below is a press release by the MMRC
with some more pressure we might just be moving forward again
10-10 SENATOR VISITOR
10-11-07
Michigan Motorized Recreation Council
For Immediate Release
Yesterday, 10-10-07, eleven of us Chuck Smith, Bill Gilbert (ATVOC), Thomas Dunn, Greg Bradley & guest, Glenn Jaffas (AMA D-14), Toby Poland, Bob Bauer, Lewis Schuler, (CCC) Doc Paulsen of Ogemaw County and myself, made the rounds to every State Senators office. Thanks to those folks for a job well done!
We passed out to every Senator, a packet which included a questionnaire asking if they supported HB 4323, if they were undecided or if they had issues and if so, what were they? We asked for a response by October 29th.
Included in the packet, an Overview of HB 4323, a list of the 19 counties with some form of ORV ordinance in place. A list of the fourteen counties where consideration is being given to establishment of a favorable ORV ordinance.
In our discussions before heading home, we found some very positive discussions were had. Some in our group receiving an instant response of “support†from the Senators and they would vote “yes†to HB 4323. Very few negative comments were heard.
We must bear in mind, there has been little done in the past few months on legislative matters other than budget issues. Some work remains in that area, but we are now nearing the time for other legislative issues to come to the surface, one of those being HB 4323.
Where do we go from here? Obviously HB 4323 is very much alive!
Have all your contacts send an e-mail to your Senator urging them to aid in any manner possible in moving HB 4323 forward. Start off their letter by stating “I support HB 4323 as presented from the House because...............
We do not want this Bill to be cluttered with amendments that could possibly turn it into a junk Bill that we cannot support. “as presented from the House†are key words that should be in every letter/e-mail/phone conversation
Of the 14 counties where we have received inquiries Alpena, Clare, Crawford, Gladwin, Grand Traverse, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Lake, Manistee, Missaukee, Oceana, Newaygo, Roscommon and Wexford, we need some of those to adopt, subject to the passage of HB 4323. Or, send a letter to their Senator advising them of such and to the members of the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs.
We need letters of support sent into the respective Senators and the
members of the Senate Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs committee from the following;
County Sheriff ’
County Commissions
Township Boards
County Road Commissions
Chambers of Commerce
If your county already has a favorable ORV ordinance, IT IS AT RISK, if
HB 4323 fails to pass the Senate. We have already seen a serious effort by MDNR to try and get counties to rescind ORV ordinances. We can expect that effort to intensify if HB 4323 fails in the Senate!
Please bear in mind, the Governor has agreed to sign the Bill as passed by the House and presented to the Senate.
It is up to each of us to make every possible effort to ensure HB 4323 passes in the Senate! The single most important thing at the moment is contact to the Senators from their constituents.
If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please feel free to write or call. dranney1@charter.net or 989 469-2405.
Sincerely;
Dick Ranney
Coordinator, Michigan Motorized Recreation Council
Chair, MDNR ORV Trail Advisory Board
Off-Road Legislative Director, AMA D-14
Member, Board of Governors, Cycle Conservation Club of Michigan
Board Member, Iosco County Parks & Recreation
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
I have great respect for the concept that tonnage gets the right of way.
That's why I do not walk on the ORV trails that I help pay for, and instead walk on non-motorized trails, that I also help pay for and help build as a volunteer. I don't know of any hikers who walk on ORV trails.
Trouble is, some members of the ORV crowd can't seem to stay off non-motorized trails. And because of the nature of the beasts they ride, they always leave ample evidence of their passage.
Unlike the ORV fans who post here, I have no problem with other peoples' kinds of recreation. Live and let live, I say. But I expect to have some opportunity to recreate without being interfered with, too.
I think this bill will encourage trespass, lead to an undesirable mix of traffic on county roads (for all concerned, actually), and may lead to damage of both roadway and shoulders. That is why I oppose it.
It is my impression that by and large ORV riders are a reasonably responsible bunch. They stay on their designated trails and don't create problems for other people.
But there is a faction of ORV enthusiasts that simply can't behave themselves. Their attitude is exactly the one expressed here toward hikers by several posters: "Go away. Get outta my way. I have entitlements but you don't."
People like that give the ORV crowd at large a black eye. They sure don't make me inclined to have much sympathy for any of their pleadings.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Okay I do agree with you, some ORV riders are very disrespectful of others rights, so are people that drive cars, snowmobile, motorcycle’s, bike riders, people sabotaging snowmobile trials, ect. ect. ect.. It’s happening without this bill already, but this bill would put higher penalties on the law breakers and fund the local law enforcement so enforcement would be more of a deterrent, also be more prevalent. As for hiking on the ORV trail, I stated if you’re on the ORV trail HIKING your putting yourself in harm’s way for no reason when there are all types of hiking trails. It's not very smart and it's not fair for the ORV rider, when he/she is riding on an ORV trail. It's the only place they have to ride. Now if you’re hiking on a hiking trail when an ORV comes along, yes they should get this clown off the ORV. My biggest concern is many ATV riders ignore the clowns giving us a bad name.
I would like your opinion on what you think about the snowmobile law? There are a lot of similarities in this proposed law.
|
|
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Please progress this Bill ASAP
Dear Senate Natural Resources & Environmental Affairs Committee,
Please progress this positive Michigan revenue generating Bill(#4323)as soon as possible. Many of us outdoor recreationist (in this case motorized ORV's) already travel to Michigan's UP to partake in their prorecreation ORV laws, but would prefer to stay in the lower peninsula.
This bill proposes a wonderful opportunity for some of Michigan's small towns & businesses to once again prosper and grow. Michigan's future positive results, supported by other areas (in MI) which have already allowed this tpye of ORV use, assure us of our beneficial outcome.
Thanks,
Jamison Burchfield
Hudsonville, MI
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
|
|
|