|
-
Mon, Jan 1 2001 12:00 AM
|
|
-
Votes Admin


- Joined on Tue, Sep 9 2008
|
2007 Senate Bill 206 (Recodify local land use planning laws )
Introduced in the Senate on February 15, 2007, to recodify the state law authorizing city, village, township and county land use planning laws into a single public act. This would make it possible for land use planning activities by different levels of government potentially to become more integrated. The bill would explicitly authorize local governments to adopt a “master plan” to “guide development that is coordinated, adjusted, harmonious, efficient, and economical; considers the character of the area and its suitability for particular uses, judged in terms of such factors as trends in land and population development; and best promotes public health, safety, morals, order, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare.” The bill would also allow greater use of electronic communications in government land use planning actions The vote was 37 in favor, 0 opposed and 1 not voting (Senate Roll Call 15 at Senate Journal 18) Click here to view bill details.
|
|
-
-
-
-
Mike Hignite



- Joined on Sat, Nov 22 2008
- Pinckney
|
Repeal land use/zoning regulations
Instead of making it easier for one land use "expert" to control the use of private property, we should repeal these laws.
We've just started to recover the sense of private property after the US Supreme Court's mind-numbingly stupid decision in Kelo. The people's outrage lead to the amendment just passed against using eminent domain to seize property from one person and give it to another.
Now, we need to repeal zoning, land use master planning, licensing, permiting, busy-body regulating interference in our normal, natural use of our own private property.
We need to realize that if we want to enjoy the use of our own private property, it naturally means that others have that same right. Some city planner, no matter how "expert," can't know what use people will want to have for their own land. As long as we don't interfer with other people doing the same thing.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on Sat, Nov 22 2008
|
I own 240 acres ,every time I turn around I have someone that wants to tell me what I can do with my land.
These little own nothing,have not paid for a thing in there life,owe thousands of credit card debt, think they own my land.
What a cheap way to control property without lifting a finger to buy it.
You know what,when these little dead beats get off theit hind end and pay me for my land, then they can zone it any way they want until then you all can kiss my butt.
Their is such a thing as paid development rights.
So this is for all the do gooders from the city,get your check book out,and for the right price you little dead beats can own all my property,until you pay me for it,you can go f----
your self! ! ! !
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on Sat, Nov 22 2008
|
no politics in Master Plan
I concur with the intent to have uniformity among all jurisdictions. I do believe that the Township Boards, City & Village Councils SHOULD NOT have final approval on Master Plans. I have seen it way to many times where SELF SERVING POLITICAL motivations "up end" decades upon decades of studies of sound planning. Planning Commissions have been charged with reviewing trends in their own communities and are appointed to be representative of the different factions within the commnity. Boards and Councils have the abiltiy now to decide (zoning)laws. I understand that (limited)Zoning is needed due to the two percent of the property owners having no respect for adjacent land owners with regard to value impact and personal enjoyment of a land owner.
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on Sat, Nov 22 2008
|
a part-time legislature....?
Great Idea.
Without private property rights we have nothing.
That is why all these laws that tell you what you can and can't do are so scary. When 60% of the population thinks that it is okay to tell property / business owners what they can do on their property we are already sliding down the slippery slope. There's a real thin line between you getting a government ordered walking path on your property to them telling me that my customers can't smoke in my bar. We need to educate the government schooled / indoctrinated sheeple to look at the big picture.
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (9 items)
|
|
|