|
Latest post 06-22-2010 6:27 PM by luannv07. 197 replies.
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
okay first of all if i was trying to get reelcted why on earth would i let inmates out? Just wanted to mention democrat in some negative form didn't you? Next, this bill just doesn't let inmates go they have to EARN it, and furthermore it just earns them five days off of every month with no tickets. Which may i add you can recieve for anything even having a button of your uniform undone. Most importantly YOU are one of the problems of the state deficit, those who followed Engler over a cliff with the joke of TIS without realizing the long term effects of your actions. Out of the great lakes states, we incarcerate at a much higher rate, for much longer terms, and then to top it off we have a parole system that unlike other states feels over and above the judge and the probability scores, and in turn people keep going in with few coming out and you are surprised that there is now a money problem with the mdoc? And it has nothing to do with the longer terms of TIS? And it has nothing to do with the fact that 40% of inmates in mdoc are clearly over their minimums, in for nonviolent crimes, and many of whom are first time offenders with no tickets and a low probability score for reoffense? I guess none of these has to do with the current problems...oh yeah i forgot it must be a democratic conspiracy.....give me a break...it's old, tired, uneducated, and frankly absurd but what do i expect?
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
I would just like to make a quick comment on here about the person who likes to argue that most to all people go back to prison... Yes people have choices to make, but often times people we consider "criminals" make poor choices, in a society such as ours, the best thing isnt always the easy thing, and some people make a poor choice.. not a mistake, you are correct on that, and please dont act like you are so perfect that you have NEVER done anything wrong. Just for the record my brother was in prison for almost 7 years for uttering and publishing, now theres a girl that lives in our town that smashed her infants head in with her foot and killed the baby and served less time then my brother did.. our judical system is very very very messed up. One more thing for the record, my brother was released from prison 5 years ago, and he has not committed a new crime, and he won't. He very much enjoys his freedom, so therefor some people just make BAD CHOICES.... lighten up a little and before you worry about other peoples lives and talking down on their loved ones, take a little look in the mirror and make sure you dont have any demons reflecting back.
~To those of you that have loved ones in prison, be strong, once they are home nothing else will matter, and as long as your their to support them and really see them through, they will be staying where they belong and thats home with you~
~Julie
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
finally someone with some sense....
to bad your plea will go unheard because some hard head people that post hear refuse to see any problems with the justice system , with the mdoc, or with blaming and harrassing inmates loved ones on here.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
no one ever said that they
ALL go back to prison. just one out of every two.
there has to be a reason for this.
either
1. they cannot help themselves, they MUST go back to prison.
2. they WANT to go back to prison.
either way, the rate of recidivism is GOING UP.
it could be that THEY BELIEVE that prison is the RIGHT PLACE FOR THEM TO BE.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
with many of these inmates...
there is cause, they are sorry, they have worked hard to show it by acting the right way while incarcerated, and by doing what was asked of them. Trust me if they don't want to do what the guards say then they won't cause they outnumber them. Judgement on others is also one of those things, as you say, God hates. Try again.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
is it an enhancement? First that was a very ignorant comment, and I can only imagine what community you were talking about. As far as there being "no beef" as you put it, against ex cons you are sadly mistaken and that is proven by you and many others that post on this site, thank you for proving your own point false. Is some of the reoffender rate caused by lack of jobs? ABSOLUTELY and you are a fool for not thinking so. If a felony excludes you from getting a job which you are otherwise qualified for how will you A. fulfill a condition of your parole which is to remain working? B. support yourself without returning to shady behavior in which to do so? No not everyone that loses or cannot find a job commits a crime, most just kill themselves, become homeless, or turn to drugs, and some of the lucky ones have families who can help them. What about those who have no family support. You can say what others should do in any situation but until you have been there you have no idea what you would do. Now i am not under the impression that ALL committ other crimes for this reason alone, there are those who have become institutionalized, and of course none of that could be because of the long years past their minimums that they waited to be paroled now could it? You live with your head in a hole oblivious to many things obvious to some of the rest of us, and I know all I needed to know about you when you made the iffy comment about "certain community".
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
hire people with college on their resume's either. that is called DISCRIMINATION. it's not always right, but it's their right to do.
it IS their business.
now, if you knew BEFORE you started being a criminal that you couldn't get a job after you started being a criminal, and you continued being a criminal anyway, it doesn't seem to have BOTHERED YOU MUCH, did it? UP UNTIL NOW, that is.
now, you KNEW, OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN that YOU wouldn't be able to get a job as a felon. that SHOULD have given you pause, or DETERRED YOU, but it DIDN'T. you were DETERMINED to be a criminal.
i think that each and every criminal has faced that same predicament, and laughed it off. now, they aren't laughing. now they are sitting in jail. when they get out (a process which you are trying to accellerate) they KNOW that they won't be able to get a job.
all these criminals want all of us law abiding citizens to instantly trust them, and give them a job, to prioritize them over OTHER law abiding citizens, simply because they have made a BAD CHOICE or ten.
this is michigan, pal, not SHANGRI-LA.
it ain't gonna happen. it ain't SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN.
that's part of the PUNISHMENT that society places on criminals. remember, we don't like criminals, so we shut them away from society. what part of that don't you understand.
we don't want them near us. they have already PROVEN that they can't be trusted. yet you ask us to not only TRUST THEM, but to put HONEST CITIZENS OUT OF WORK TO ACCOMODATE THEM.
quit your whining. you KNEW that this was going to happen. YOU decided to commit crimes anyway.
LIVE WITH THE CONSEQUENCES.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
in which community is it an enhancement?
[detroit. flint. lansing.]
First that was a very ignorant comment, and I can only imagine what community you were talking about.
[no you can't. you can only imagine every criminal out walking the streets.]
As far as there being "no beef" as you put it, against ex cons you are sadly mistaken and that is proven by you and many others that post on this site, thank you for proving your own point false.
[there are those who have a 'beef' with ex-cons. they don't like them. they don't trust them. SHOULD THEY??? many business owners have been robbed before. they have been stolen from. they DON'T want to be stolen from again. to invite an ex-con into the 'business family' is an invitation to be ripped off (or worse) again.]
Is some of the reoffender rate caused by lack of
jobs? ABSOLUTELY and you are a fool for not thinking so.
[if a lack of a job is a reason to re-offend, it is a reason to offend in the first place. you don't see the REST OF US doing such a stupid thing, do you? NO.]
If a felony excludes you from getting a job which you are otherwise qualified for how will you A. fulfill a condition of your parole which is to remain working?
[the condition of parole is to HAVE a job. if you have it, you should be able to keep it. if there are NO JOBS, then YOU DON'T GET PAROLE.]
B. support yourself without returning to shady behavior in which to do so?
[in one breath, you say that the jails are full of honest, hard working citizens who just fell on 'hard times'. they HAD to commit the crimes they did to put bread in their children's mouths. then in the next breath, you say that if they don't get a job, they will have to 'RETURN to the shady behavior'. make up your mind.]
No not everyone that loses or cannot find a job commits a crime, most just kill themselves, become homeless, or turn to drugs, and some of the lucky ones have families who can help them.
[so, you are telling me that if i'm out of a job, my ONLY OPTIONS are suicide, homelessness, drug abuse, or sponging off my family or the state??? HOW ABOUT FINDING ANOTHER JOB INSTEAD OF TURNING TO CRIME??? it's what law abiding people DO.]
What about those who have no family support. You can say what others should do in any situation but until you have been there you have no idea what you would do.
[i've lost jobs. i have NEVER committed a crime, or 'turned to drugs' or attempted to kill myself. i've simply GOTTEN ANOTHER JOB.]
Now i am not under the impression that ALL committ other crimes for this reason alone, there are those who have become institutionalized, and of course none of that could be because of the long years past their minimums that they waited to be paroled now could it?
[NO. it's because they decided early in life to commit crimes, and they have spent the MAJORITY OF THAT LIFE BEHIND BARS. they have become COMFORTABLE living in a cell. THAT is the definition of institutionalized.]
You live with your head in a hole oblivious to many things obvious to some of the rest of us,[maybe thats because it's YOU with your head in a hole.] and I know all I needed to know about you when you made the iffy comment about "certain community".
[maybe you should take your head out of your own ass and look around. realize that you are 'part of the problem' from our way of looking at things, not 'part of the solution'. in fact, if YOU hadn't decided to be a criminal, you wouldn't BE in this predicament right now. everyone else, all of us who are NOT in jail, all take responsibility for our own actions, and DON'T COMMIT CRIMES. you have that responsibility FORCED UPON YOU. you don't like the fact that i have brought up all these facts, and spoiled your little sales pitch. you don't like the fact that as long as i keep bringing up YOUR shortcomings, early prison release for your bretheren becomes less and less of a reality. here is another little dose of reality for you. as long as 44% of your bretheren keep re-offending within months of release, paroles will continue to be a rare commodity. either change the behavior that got you into this mess, or live with the consequences of your decisions.]
|
|
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
prisons, not schools.
rehabilitation is something that was dreamed about, but never funded. it is a lofty goal, but one that never recieved a dime of funding.
if MOST of the people who are in jail were abused when young, why aren't they TURNING IN THEIR PARENTS like they turn in their teachers, ministers, and priests?
they don't mind admitting to being abused and molested by THEM, why should being abused and molested by their parents be any different?
that tells me that IT REALLY DIDN'T HAPPEN THAT WAY.
besides, thousands of people are abused and molested each day, and THEY don't use it as an excuse to commit crimes, they use it as a tool to move on and live their lives.
yes, we DO expect the inmate to stand up and be responsible for his actions from the day we let him out of jail. the same thing that is expected of EVERY OTHER CITIZEN OF THIS COUNTRY. why should THEY be any different?
we all have to live by the same rules.
if inmates have a hard time living by the rules, it is NO WONDER they can't obey the law. no amount of schooling will change that in a person. no amount of coddling will make that go away. the inmate has to WANT TO CHANGE. he has to have some INCENTIVE to change.
recidivism is also called GIVING UP ON SOCIETY. so why, if the inmate gives up on society, shouldn't society give up on him?
all you liberals keep talking about what society should GIVE TO THE INMATE. it's not up to society to GIVE THE INMATE ANYTHING. it's up to the inmate to give to society.
if he can't, or won't, then he doesn't deserve inclusion into OUR SOCIETY. he can continue to be treated as an OUTCAST.
i know that it's a LOT TO ASK, but it's no more, and no less than is asked of every other citizen.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Why do former prisoners return to jail
Jobs are not readily available for anyone in Michigan let alone someone who has served time in jail. They can't find a place to live if they can't get a job. The can't eat if they can't find a job. And the list goes on and on.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
financial trouble because of greed, graft, mismanagement, apathy, stupidity, and the unions.
there are other reasons, but these are the biggies. we elect people to 'LEAD', yet we expect(stupidly so) that our elected leaders can ADD AND SUBTRACT.
we expect them to look after OUR interests, as we BELIEVED WHAT THEY SAID, AND VOTED FOR THEM, but they don't.
we expect them to be able to go from whatever job (usually attorney) and be able to smoothly transition into politics. this is, of course, after spending millions of dollars on getting elected.
the problem is, none of them has ever had to make and stick to a budget. none of them has ever been told no when they asked for money.
it's about time we cut off their allowance.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
honey you are wasting your
breath with these folks they don't get simple math. More inmates coming in + less inmates recieving parole even when LEGALLY ELIGIBLE = MONEY PROBLEMS AND OVERCROWDING. Its simple really. They want to believe that the prisons are cushy so that they can justify cutting from those who aren't even recieving it. Tell me if the $100 is going to the inmate why do i pay for my loved one to see a doc and dentist? Why do i pay for anything other than three kid sized meals a day? Why do i pay for any phone call that he makes? The answer to that is IF it takes $100 a inmate to have a uniform, a cot, a pair of shoes, and three small meals damn i'd say thats really cushy. The point is that even if you cut it will not stop the overcrowding due to overly long sentences(which other states do not have),and this will again lead to overspending in the mdoc which the state can no longer afford. Fix the TIS muck up, fix the overzealous and power hungry parole board, provide job training anything less is just a band aid that will pop loose within months.
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
you are the one that does not understand
Come on get real!! They have already cut as much as possible from the inmates. They have cut all rehab,all job training,all substance abuse classes,smaller meals & electricity only certain hours of the day. The hundred dollars a day you think goes to the prisoner includes the cost for the facility the guards and all other costs associated with running an institution. The reason the TIS passed was because the people of Michigan thought it would cut the recidivism rate but it has done the exact opposite the rate is higher now than before TIS. So I have news for you this bill is going to pass and the reason why is because TIS is not working and only costing the state millions of dollars that we pay for with our taxes. So if you were not so thick headed you would realize that the only way to keep the state from going bankrupt is to pass this bill. So keep coming on this site and bashing the people that have loved ones locked up and pray that you never walk in there shoes.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Come on get real!! They have already cut as much as possible from the inmates.
[you assume that i mean to cut more from the inmates. you are wrong. forty other states do MORE than michigan does with A LOT LESS MONEY. why can't michgian do the same? because they are corrupt.]
They have cut all rehab,all job training,all substance abuse classes,smaller meals & electricity only certain hours of the day. The hundred dollars a day you think goes to the prisoner includes the cost for the facility the guards and all other costs associated with running an institution.
[then why can alabama do EXACTLY THE SAME THING, including running a capital punishment program, with all the expenses attached to that, for $14.00 a day? why does the state of alabama get so much for so little?]
The reason the TIS passed was because the people of Michigan thought it would cut the recidivism rate but it has done the exact opposite the rate is higher now than before TIS.
[no, the reason truth in sentencing was passed is because the people of the state of michigan thought that prisoners were getting off far too easy on their sentences. truth in sentencing is about THE LENGTH OF TIME an inmate stays behind bars, recidivism is about how long an inmate stays out before offending again. the two have nothing to do with each other, except that they are both done by inmates.]
So I have news for you this bill is going to pass and the reason why is because TIS is not working and only costing the state millions of dollars that we pay for with our taxes.
[that is NOT good news. think of how much letting all those inmates go is going to cost this state. yes, YOU will get your loved one back, but only until he cannot control himself once again and goes out and does something that sends him back to his beloved cellmate.]
So if you were not so thick headed you would realize that the only way to keep the state from going bankrupt is to pass this bill.
[once again, you let your love for your inmate override your common sense. this bill is nothing more than a band-aid, lowering the COST PER INMATE PER DAY is the only way to keep this state from going bankrupt. all releasing them early without solving the recidivism problem first is going to do is add another conviction to their record, it won't keep them out of jail. so, what are you going to do when the recidivism rate climbs again? close another few jails and just stop putting people in prison at all?]
So keep coming on this site and bashing the people that have loved ones locked up and pray that you never walk in there shoes.
[if presenting the FACTS is bashing, then YES, i will keep bashing. i have only pointed out that your loved one has made a STRING OF BAD DECISIONS THAT SHOWED NO LOVE FOR YOU. and you keep on 'sticking with him' despite the fact that none of his FUTURE decisions is going to involve you either. he has PROVEN that love for you is ONE SIDED. you love him, but he loves to do whatever he has to do to go to prison. you may disagree, but look where he is, and think about where he ISN'T. he IS in prison, he ISN'T with YOU.]
|
|
|
|
|