|
Latest post 11-04-2011 5:44 PM by tana3733. 4,371 replies.
-
-
-
sandie_221


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
What do you think of state prison system?
It's one of the biggest in the country, and there is a fight underway on how to bring the prison system in line with a shrinking state budget.
We would like to hear from you about what you think should or could be done.
Should the system be shrunk to save money?
Do you feel safer with more than 50,000 locked up, or is crime still a concern?
What can be done to curb crime?
Do you feel safe?
Also, is prison funding too much of a political hot potato or is not enough being done to keep people safe?
Your thoughts on the state's prison system:
With the state in financial trouble and concern about criminal behavior, what should Michigan's leaders do with the Department of Corrections?
Coppy and paste the website below into your address bar to give your thoughts.
http://204.176.34.90/edit/prisonparole.asp
|
|
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
THEY SHOULD...THEY MURDERED SOMEONE AND TOOK AWAY THEIR LIFE AND ENDED THE SUFFERING. MY RAPIST CSC1 MURDERED ME 30 YEARS AGO AND I SUFFER EVERYDAY, HE TOOK AWAY MY LIFE BUT MY SUFFERERING NEVER ENDS AND IT CARRIES THROUGH TO EVERY RELATIONSHIP AND BOTH OF MY CHILDREN AND NO DOUBT THEIR CHILDREN'S CHILDREN. MURDERERS HAVE LESS THAN A 2% RECIDISISM RATE...UNLIKE RAPIST'S WHO HAVE OVER A 95% REPEAT OFFENDER RATE!! THOSE CSC 3 AND 4 SHOULD NOT EVEN BE ON THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTERY WHY? MANY? MOST? ARE CONSENSUAL ACTS BROUGHT ON BY VINDICTIVE GIRLFRIENDS OR THEIR PARENTS ...THE CSC 1 AND 2 - MOST LIKELY - HAVE EARNED THE DISTINCTION OF BEING A "VIOLENT" SEX OFFENDER OR ONE WHO HAS CROSSED A MORALLY REPUGNENT LINE IE., A FAMILY MEMBER, A CHILD, ETC.
AS A CSC1 RAPE VICTIM I FULLY SUPPORT THE BILL FOR BONUS GOOD TIME TO RELEASE THOSE INMATES OR GIVE A GOOD TIME BONUS TO THOSE WHO HAVE DEMONSTRATED MATURE GOOD CONDUCT OVER A SIGNIFICANT PERIOD OF TIME, HAVE FULFILLED ALL OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL, EDUCATIONAL, WORKED AND (AT LEAST ATTEMPTED) RETRIBUTION AT A MINIMUM SHOULD BE GIVEN A BONUS OF EARLY PAROLE TIME. PUT THEM ON A TETHER AND MAKE MORE MONY FOR THE STATE BUT AT LEAST GIVE THEM A CHANCE FOR A LIFE AND SOCIAL SECURITY RATHER ANOTHER FUTURE FINANCIAL BURDEN. ANYONE CAN PUT ON A FRONT FOR A YEAR OR TWO BUT 10 OR 15 YEARS IN GENERAL POPULATION WITHOUT ANY TICKETS OR VIOLATIONS...ONLY A TRUELY REHABILITATED INMATE CAN CONTINUE A PATTERN OF GOOD BEHAVIOR THAT IS SINCERE - WITHOUT EVENTUALLY "SNAPPING". IF A PERSON HAS BEEN A MODEL INMATE FOR SAY 10 YEARS - WITH NO VIOLATIONS - AND IS STILL LOOKING A ANOTHER 20 YEARS? (OR EVEN LIFE?) DON'T YOU THINK HE SHOULD BE GIVEN SAY 10 YEARS OFF THE 20? GIVING HIM THE HOPE THAT IN 10 MORE YEARS, IF HE CONTINUES HIS GOOD BEHAVIOR, HE WILL BE RELEASED? OR LIFE - FOR EVERY 10 YEARS OF GOOD BEHAVIOR - YOU GIVE 10 YEARS OFF? THIS WOULD GIVE THEM A GLIMMER OF HOPE AND INCENTIVE TO CONTINUE THEIR GOOD BEHAVIOR AND INFLUENCE OTHER INMATES AS WELL TO NOT ACT LIKE ANIMALS, NOT TO MENTION THE SAFETY FACTORS FOR THE GUARDS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT. THE INMATES DOING 20 YEARS NOW HAVE TO CONTINUALLY WATCH FOR THE NATURAL LIFERS - THEY HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BY MESSING WITH SOMEONE WHO IS ALMOST OUT THE DOOR AFTER 20 YEARS - GETTING HIM A TICKET (BECAUSE THE INNOCENT GUY WILL GET ONE - IT MATTERS NOT WHO WAS AT FAULT OR STARTED IT AND THEIR IS NO "SELF-DEFENSE" ARGUEMENT IN PRISON)MISERY LOVES COMPANY...THEN THE ONE WHO ALMOST ELIGIBLE FOR PAROLE - DUE TO NO FAULT OF HIS OWN IS NOW DENIED PAROLE BECAUSE OF ANOTHER INMATE. THE LIFERS SHOULD BE IN THEIR OWN LITTLE WORLD, WHEREIN THE ONLY PEOPLE THEY CAN SCREW WITH ARE THOSE WHO HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE EITHER - RATHER THAN SOMEONE WHO HAS ALOT TO LOSE. PLEASE SERIOUSLY CONSIDER THIS AND SEE THE WIN-WIN TO IT!
OUR MDOC INMATE NUMBERS IN 1995 WERE ONLY 240,000 INMATES SINCE THE PRISON SYSTEM NUMBERING BEGAN BACK IN 1940'S? THAT IS 240,000 INMATES ENTERED INTO THE SYSTEM FROM 1940'S? TO 1994...240,000 OVER 40 YEARS...OUR NUMBERS NOW SINCE 1994 AT 240,000 THROUGH JULY 2008 IN THE LAST 14 YEARS ARE OVER 691,500 INMATES IN THE SYSTEM. THAT'S AN INCREASE IN 14 YEARS .... 14 YEARS .... OF 451,500 INMATES? WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE??? OH THEY DIDN'T HAVE DRUGS IN 1940? THEY DIDN'T HAVE CARS? THEY DIDN'T HAVE RAPES? THEY DIDN'T HAVE MURDERS? ARMED ROBBERY? B&E'S? YES THEY DID!!! BUT THIS GETTING TOUGH ON CRIME IS A CROCK OF CRAP THEY ONLY TAKE AWAY A PERSONS HOPE. IF YOU ARE GETTING LIFE FOR A RAPE - WHY DIDN'T YOU JUST MURDER THE VICTIM? BECAUSE YOU WOULD HAVE GOTTEN - HA!! LIFE...BUT AT LEAST YOU LEFT NOT WITNESSES! PLEASE THINK ABOUT THIS! AND SUPPORT THIS INITIATIVE!! IT MAKES GOOD SENSE FOR ALL OF US!!! I FOR ONE DON'T WANT TO PAY TAXES TO FEED AN INMATE FOR 40-70 YEARS WHO HAD A 1ST DEGREE RETAIL FRAUD CASE AGAINST WALMART AND TARGET!! DO YOU????
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
crazycajun



- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
needs a second chance. but you seem to think that every inmate DOES. are none of them TRULY GUILTY? DON'T ANY OF THEM deserve to do all of their time?
if not, then you need to change more than this law could possibly accomplish. you need to revise the entire law enforcement system in michigan.
a tall order, especially with the current administration in office.
michigan constitution, article 1. Sec. 6.
Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.
keep your powder dry.
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994
|
|
-
|
|
Changes coming to MichiganVotes
Dear Friends:
In a few weeks MichiganVotes will receive a new look and several new features. The centerpiece of the new “MichiganVotes 2.0” will be to move conversations like this one right onto the home page via a full-feature discussion forum software package.
More than anyone else those who have engaged the prison reform issue have demonstrated how a community of passionate interest can come together on this website. The new features will enhance that.
I want to get your input on one likely change:
Don’t you get weary of mostly talking to “anonymous user?” Most websites require registration and a username to post comments. We haven’t in part because the current site doesn’t “remember” you, and requires users to log-on every time they open it. The new site will “remember” you.
As is common with most interactive websites registration requires giving an email, but the Privacy Policy posted under the “About this site” link (left side of page) says this:
“MichiganVotes does not release (nor has it ever released) to third parties any personal identifying information of past or current website visitors, including registered users, without express permission, except as required by law.”
What do you think? Please e-mail me directly with your views.
Regards,
Jack McHugh
MichiganVotes Editor
mchugh@mackinac.org
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
is fl inmates going to get out earley
I was wondering if fl corrections is passing a bill inmates for earley release
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
WHY DOES FL DO 85 PERSENT
WHY DOES FL CORRECTIONS DO 85 PERSENT OF THERE TIME AND MOST PLACES DO 7 21 I THINK THAT IS WRONG . SOME PEOPLE NEVER EVER REALLY HAD A CHANCE AT LIFE AND WHEN THERE IN FRONT OF A JUDGE IN FL IT IS LIKE THE DEATH PENILTY . I
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
|
|
Changes coming to MichiganVotes
Dear Friends:
In a few weeks MichiganVotes will receive a new look and several new features. Check out the MichiganVotes 2.0 "beta" site at http://beta.michiganvotes.org/. Note: There are known glitches, and any comments posted there will disappear when the actual site goes live in the next couple weeks.
The centerpiece of the new site will be to move conversations like this one right onto the home page via a full-feature discussion forum software package.
More than anyone else those who have engaged the prison reform issue have demonstrated how a community of passionate interest can come together on this website. The new features will enhance that.
I want to get your input on one likely change:
Don’t you get weary of mostly talking to “anonymous user?” Most websites require registration and a username to post comments. We haven’t in part because the current site doesn’t “remember” you, and requires users to log-on every time they open it. The new site will “remember” you.
As is common with most interactive websites registration requires giving an email, but the Privacy Policy posted under the “About this site” link (left side of page) says this:
“MichiganVotes does not release (nor has it ever released) to third parties any personal identifying information of past or current website visitors, including registered users, without express permission, except as required by law.”
What do you think? Please e-mail me directly with your views.
Regards,
Jack McHugh
mchugh@mackinac.org
|
|
-
-
-
crazycajun



- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
wanted to say that I still oppose this bill.
I'm still waiting for someone to explain how this bill will reduce recidivism, which is only rewarded by gratuitous early release.
michigan constitution, article 1. Sec. 6.
Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.
keep your powder dry.
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994
|
|
|
|
|