Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 12-01-2011 2:36 PM by TaterSalad. 5 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2006 House Bill 6580 (Welfare reform package )

    Introduced in the House on September 20, 2006, to impose a 48 month lifetime limit on cash welfare payments to able-bodied recipients (with a number of exceptions), and establish recipient tracking, work and training requirements that conform with the limit. A one-year extension could be granted under certain conditions, such as a mother with a child under age three. Sanctions would be imposed on recipients who fail to comply with work and training requirements (three months of no benefits for the first two failures, and one year for a third violation). The bill establishes more exceptions to the sanctions and the four-year cap than previous time limit legislation vetoed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm. Exceptions include mothers of a child less than age three, people who are temporarily disabled, or when the county unemployment rate exceeds nine percent. The four-year cap would not be retroactive

    The vote was 61 in favor, 41 opposed and 8 not voting

    (House Roll Call 1133 at House Journal 89)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 12-02-2006 11:07 AM In reply to

    Rep. Cushingberry's "no vote explanation"

    Rep. Cushingberry, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: "Mr. Speaker and Members of the House: Happy Holidays to Michigan families struggling to survive. The outgoing House leadership continues it's assault on the poor. This bill presented to us within the past several hours has not been reviewed thoroughly and the substitute requires more than the cursory deliberation afforded members today. In the budget process we learned there are really no 'able ­ bodied' slothfully in receipt of our meager welfare benefits. Persons who are disabled, mentally and physically not covered in the myriad of other programs and families with children are who this is bill affects. This is not a requirement of any Federal law since the Governor's JET program is not truly implemented and it should be given an opportunity to succeed. We need to take more time and carefully review such a drastic change in policy, especially since the national policy continues to ship jobs overseas Earlier this year we passed further earned income tax credits for the working poor but this bill seems to fly against that positive development. The 67% income disregard could end up lowering the amount of income disregarded for those who need it the most (i.e. earn least, for example working mothers, those just transitioning back into the work force etc.). This form of operation is the worst way to legislate, because it denigrates the appropriations process, and continues to weaken the committee system, a time honored and well proven tradition of the Michigan Legislature."
  • 12-06-2007 8:17 PM In reply to

    thats to long

    48 months is to long, they should be allowed 18 months over their lifetime, with no exceptions. I personally am tired of paying for people who constantly find new ways to scam people out of their hard earned money. Everyone should have to get jobs, no matter what, their are numerous work at home jobs disabled people could do to earn in income. Taxes are already through the roof, I personally would love to see Welfare totally stopped. Do not try to eak through life on the success of others, and guess what, I am a hardworking individual who works hard 24/7. I didn't make money by sitting back collecting it off hard working americans. I went to college, and by the way, I dare you to say I cannot afford college, well their are so many programs to help people out with this it's not funny. My point STOP BEING LAZY AND WORK!
  • 03-27-2008 8:11 AM In reply to

    classifieds

    to all people who are unemployed: you all need to get a paper and get a classified ad and find a job and get a real life and keep youself busy and stop getting welfare checks it is a waste of tax dollars and you are just lazy and you need to get a job.
  • 06-07-2011 11:10 PM In reply to

    Re: thats to long

    I just started the JET program yesterday because, YES, I am applying for Cash Assistance. I already receive Food Stamps and have Medicaid for myself, my husband, and my children.

    I have a college education, I went to school, I have worked in my life time and I would LOVE to work now. However, THERE ARE NO JOBS OUT THERE! I have applied at EVERY SINGLE business, with or without a "Help Wanted" sign in their window. I visit daily to check on my applications, I have resumes posted on several online job talent banks as well.

    Are you aware that our local unemplyment rate for my city is 8.3 as of April 2011? And that 4 out of every 10 WORKING adults are STILL receiving some sort of goverment aid from welfare? Whether this is food stamps or cash assistance. 

    I am NOT lazy. I would much rather work then get assistance. You may say that people like me are a rareity compared to others in the system, and you could be right. But don't lump us all together into one group, because there are several different reasons as to why people get on welfare, and most people do not get on welfare to sit on the couch and receive free money.

    The amount you actually receive is equal to 2 weeks of a good paying job. We have a family size of 6 and we get a little over 600 dollars in cash assistance. In what world does that pay for anything? When my rent is over $530. I then have to put gas in my 1 vehicle I own, no luxury car here, at a whopping 4.17 a gallon, I have electricity, gas, shampoo and other household items, with the remaining approx. $130. Again I ask, in what world could I live on that? How can I pay for anything and even "Survive"? So NO, I am not sitting back and collecting 100's of dollars and living easy on the hard earned money of others. NO ONE on welfare is living easy.

  • 12-01-2011 2:36 PM In reply to

    Re: Rep. Cushingberry's "no vote explanation"

     Mr. Cushinberry.........explain this to the taxpayers who have to NOW foot the expense  !

     

     

Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems