Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 07-27-2008 12:20 PM by Anonymous Citizen. 237 replies.
Page 2 of 6 (238 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 09-22-2006 5:35 PM In reply to

    NO DAUGHTER OF MINE

    THIS WILL NOT FLY WITH ME. NO DAUGHTER OF MINE WILL BE GETTING IT. I WILL NOT TOLERATE THE STATE TELLING ME WHAT TO DO WITH MY LIFE OF THE LIVES OF MY FAMILY MEMBERS. PERIOD.
  • 09-22-2006 9:00 PM In reply to

    if the "state"

    that is, the liberals, decide that your daughter has to have this, they will simply make it a requirement for graduation, or continued enrollment, or maybe even a requirement for getting a driver's license. almost makes you want to start home schooling, doesn't it?
  • 09-25-2006 6:01 PM In reply to

    Men controlled women for thousands of years, it's over.

    This is about being proactive in our health care and there IS choice involved. It's not about control.
  • 09-25-2006 6:03 PM In reply to

    I assume you can sign your name in cursive

    Sign the paper. IT WILL BE OK.
  • 09-25-2006 6:04 PM In reply to

    C-H_O-I-C-E

    Sign the paper.
  • 09-25-2006 9:12 PM In reply to

    spoken like

    a true liberal. sign the paper, it will be okay. didn't they say that right before they herded all those people onto the cattle cars?
  • 09-26-2006 7:15 AM In reply to

    this is about the mental midgets in lansingistan controling how we raise our children. Get a grip. Not every bad thing that has ever happened to you is caused by the evil white male. You should seek help for the feminazi thing you have going on. try reading Dr. Mike Adams.
  • 09-26-2006 8:15 AM In reply to

    Are You Nuts?

    You Say "Should the parents teach abstenance the child can safely rebel because of state protection." I can deduce two things from your statement. 1-That you think that Abstenance is inferior to a degenerate lifestyle and 2- That you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. "safely rebel? State protection? Maybe you are not aware but there are dozens of other deadlier diseases that are in play here. I hope that you do not have any children under your charge.
  • 09-26-2006 2:10 PM In reply to

    Control?

    So a majority of male legislators vote that young girls must have vaccines and that is how women take back control of their lives? Better not let my wife hear you be so dim.
  • 09-26-2006 2:14 PM In reply to

    it's the fact that

    legislators vote that girls MUST have the vaccine, as opposed to CAN have the vaccine if THEY and their PARENTS wish.
  • 09-26-2006 4:27 PM In reply to

    Just mark NO on the form

    You can say no
  • 09-26-2006 4:36 PM In reply to

    Perhaps you should ask the AAUW what they think?

    I imagine the American Association of University Women support this bill. This bill encourages preventing DEATH. There is STILL choice involved.
  • 09-26-2006 4:42 PM In reply to

    Your response lacks clarity, details, please.

    Did Jews sign a waiver?
  • 09-26-2006 4:44 PM In reply to

    Many good opportunities have happened due to white males

    BUT, the whole femme fatal, original sin garbage is going by the wayside fast. So last millenium! Get used to it!
  • 09-26-2006 4:47 PM In reply to

    jews were first

    "identified", which means they were required by law to go to a local station and be "registered". yes, they had to fill out and sign paperwork. no, it was't a "waiver". they never had rights according to the nazis. next,after "registration", the nazi's used the information from the registration forms to disarm the jews, also by law. after that, they were unable to stop the nazi's from systematically rounding them up so that they could be efficiently exterminated.
  • 09-26-2006 4:48 PM In reply to

    did you not

    study history??? ever watch the history channel???
  • 09-26-2006 4:48 PM In reply to

    Thanks for sharing, but this bill is about saving lives

    not killing people. I don't think your comments rate analogy status. Sorry. I learned something though, so thanks for sharing anyway. I love to learn.
  • 09-26-2006 4:49 PM In reply to

    did YOU sign a waiver?

    before you registered your weapon?
  • 09-26-2006 4:50 PM In reply to

    Of course, I watch the History Channel, right next to the Sci Fi channel

    on my tv. It's one of my favorites. That's where I learned all my women's history stuff. Can't get enough of the history channel. I don't think the signing stuff you shared is common knowledge. Thanks for sharing.
  • 09-26-2006 4:50 PM In reply to

    no one said

    the vaccine was bad. being FORCED to take it IS.
  • 09-26-2006 4:51 PM In reply to

    What are you talking about?

    What weapon?
  • 09-26-2006 4:51 PM In reply to

    Are you off your meds today? What weapon?

    ?
  • 09-26-2006 4:52 PM In reply to

    Just sign the form like to loser parent you are, then

    It will be fine. Take a pill.
  • 09-26-2006 4:55 PM In reply to

    are you blind??

    read the posts.
  • 09-26-2006 4:56 PM In reply to

    Nazi "registration" just like MUTANT registration on XMEN

    Told you, Sci Fi and History Channel together! As a matter of fact, Magneto was a nice Jewish boy before his family was separated in the concentration camp, and he discovered his powers. He didn't have a great deal of hope for humanity after that.
  • 09-26-2006 4:56 PM In reply to

    that's why we

    don't approve of mandatory vaccinations. tell me again how big of a loser YOU are.
  • 09-26-2006 4:57 PM In reply to

    Oh, yes, I see, registering weapons

    again, this bill is about saving lives of women/girls give me a break
  • 09-26-2006 4:58 PM In reply to

    your child need not take it

    this is not nazi legislation
  • 09-26-2006 4:58 PM In reply to

    neither did the jews.

    but they press on. they have made a paradise out of a barren desert, and have vowed to never have the whole "identification, disarmament, eradication" thing ever happen again.
  • 09-26-2006 4:58 PM In reply to

    We? Are you an anti-nazi secret society?

    ?
  • 09-26-2006 5:00 PM In reply to

    And of course we support the Jews in never letting society forget

    so that we never make the same mistake, but the fact remains that this is a good bill.
  • 09-26-2006 5:00 PM In reply to

    this bill is about

    MANDATING what a parent MUST do, as opposed to allowing a parent to decide upon the benifits/risks involved for themselves. it assumes that parents are stupid, and the state knows better. it also assumes that all girls are sexually active before 16. both are insulting to most parents, but no more so than having another CHOICE taken away.
  • 09-26-2006 5:01 PM In reply to

    I think it's efficient medical care, routine.

    If you don't want it, opt out. Don't get your panties in a bunch.
  • 09-26-2006 5:01 PM In reply to

    we made

    the same mistake in new orleans during katrina. we "register" weapons here regularly, making the same mistake here. what was that about not making the same mistake???
  • 09-26-2006 5:02 PM In reply to

    Well, as a careful observer, some parents are stupid, some, not most

    and just because a girl gets it early doesn't mean that she or her parents assume she is or will be sexually active.
  • 09-26-2006 5:03 PM In reply to

    Fuss all you want about this. Have a nice day. The bill shows wisdom.

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • 09-26-2006 5:32 PM In reply to

    Only eradication I see in this bill is the cancer, Mr. Crazypants.

    Get over it.
  • 09-26-2006 8:54 PM In reply to

    the law, so far

    doesn't ALLOW opting out. maybe with some good amendments....
  • 09-26-2006 9:01 PM In reply to

    i'm all for

    eradicating cancer. i'm not AT ALL for being MANDATED to do it. there was NO attempt to offer this to the public as a PUBLIC SERVICE, it was just ASSUMED that every sixteen year old girl is sexually active, and thus needs this protection, and that the parents weren't bright enough to figure this was a good thing. (so, maybe, just maybe, it ISN'T)it was just MANDATED. even horses don't like sugar JAMMED DOWN THEIR THROATS.
  • 09-26-2006 9:10 PM In reply to

    it's not her parents

    that assumed that she was sexually active, it's the state. i've read posts from people who rail for days about the "injustice" of mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients, and the same crowd stands by idly about mandatory vaccination for sixteen year old girls aginst a sexually transmitted disease.
Page 2 of 6 (238 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems