|
Latest post Tue, Jul 13 2010 1:55 PM by amazonRay. 16 replies.
-
Mon, Jan 1 2001 12:00 AM
|
|
-
Votes Admin


- Joined on Tue, Sep 9 2008
|
2006 Senate Bill 1364 (Revise minimum wage for younger workers )
Introduced in the Senate on July 26, 2006, to make it unlawful to employ a worker who is less than 18 years old for less than 85 percent of the government mandated miniumum wage for older workers. The bill leaves in place a $4.25 "training wage" minimum wage mandate exception for workers less than 20 years old during their first 90 days on the job The vote was 38 in favor, 0 opposed and 0 not voting (Senate Roll Call 634 at Senate Journal 77) Click here to view bill details.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on Sat, Nov 22 2008
|
Punctuation and grammar aside, your opinion exemplifies the failure of the educational system.
The only jobs that pay minimum wage are entry level. Unskilled, inexperienced employees are whom? What is the job? Stockboy. Clerk. Gofer.
They're for part-timers and second-jobbers. They're not careers...although such an entry level job may very well lead to a career.
Jacking up the minimum wage makes no economic sense because: (1) It will reduce the number of positions available; (2) It is self defeating in that it contributes to inflation, rendering any "benefit" to a wage increase temporary, at best.
Inflation occurs because a segment of the population will suddenly have more disposable cash, so prices do rise. Moreover, an artificial increase in the cost of entry-level labor during manufacturing and distribution will find it's way down to the end price, adding to inflation.
In the end, jacking up the minimum wage reduces entry-level opportunities and is self-defeating in that it triggers inflation, ultimately reducing buying power.
I used to know a DemocRat who would get on a high horse about the stupid minimum wage throughout any Republican administration (he'd be quiet about it during a DemocRat's reign). He used to say, "How can anyone raise a family on $X an hour?"
Anticipating this argument, I'll say this also: If all a person can earn is minimum wage, he's not at a point were he should take a wife or start a family. These things aren't free. They're not gifts. There is no right to start a family and buy a house at 18. Minimum wage is not a living wage...and can never be for the reasons as above.
Maybe Michigan has been doing a lot better since I left. If not, the fact that it has chosen to frighten business away by increasing the minimum wage at the state level is irresponsible.
Jim
Westminster, CO
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on Sat, Nov 22 2008
|
Many young people work for college money
Pay every citizen the same. Don't discriminate against youth
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on Sat, Nov 22 2008
|
Business owners wanting to pay kids less are USERS.
It's discrimination. Many poor, middle class kids work for college NOT play money. Shame on you.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on Sat, Nov 22 2008
|
Shame on you Sen. Cameron Brown
Stickin' it to the poor families whose kids have to work to better themselves
|
|
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on Sat, Nov 22 2008
|
They have to learn to work sometime.
If the worker shows productivity, they quickly gain in pay rate and responsibility. If they show productivty and do not advance in pay or are not treated fairly, they should leave and find an employer they trust and enjoy. It is a two way street.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on Sat, Nov 22 2008
|
Talk to the ones who work-
Most teenagers are not working for the popular belief of what is called "play money." With the poor economy today, scholarships are few, and grants are less. We have to work to pay for college, or be in debt the second we graduate from high school. It is not fair to pay teens less than older adults because of their youth. If Jonny is 18 and Cindy is 26 and they both apply at Wal-Mart, then both should be hired in at the same starting price. Don't make Jonny drop out of school before he starts! We need to encourage kids that working will pay off- not make them work more.
|
|
-
-
-
-
amazonRay


- Joined on Tue, Jul 13 2010
|
Re: Talk to the ones who work-
I have employed over 100 people 14-26 years old in my retail business in Michigan.
If you think it is unfair to be paid less than some one who is older and has more experience than you, then you will likely be unemployed.
When the minimum wage increased from $5.35 to $7.40 over the past few years, I have completely stopped hiring high school kids and reduced hiring of college kids. They do not have the same level of responsibility nor the experience to anticipate and deliver against what an employer needs from them. If I have to train AND pay them the same, I overwhelmingly will just hire mature workers who already know they have to deliver value to me and our customers.
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (17 items)
|
|
|