|
Latest post 05-29-2006 10:46 AM by crazycajun. 20 replies.
-
01-01-2001 12:00 AM
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Lemmons III to Save Us from Cheap Burgers
Whenever the legislature takes up a crusade for our own good, you never have to dig too deep to find the hidden tax increase. Whether it's saving us from Canadian trash, waging war on water bottles, or taxing traffic tickets or cigarettes, legislators of both parties are never so eager to do good as when they can do well by their favorite governmental programs.
In House Bill 4265, Rep. Lemmons III wants schools to measure kids' body-fat index and send the results home on "health report cards" to combat an alleged epidemic of child obesity. In HB 5264, he wants to add 2 per cent to your bill at all "fast food" restaurants. Presumably being told that your kid is a bloater will make you feel good about paying this additional tax the next time you take the family to a hambuger stand, and discourage you from super-sizing both your meal and your offspring. The proceeds will be spent to propagandize against fat kids.
An even bigger, greasier hamburger, ordered from a waiter instead of from a teenager behind a counter, won't be subject to the tax. Lower-middle-class diners will pay a heftier part of this tax than will the upper crust. That's by design. Not only do those people tend toward the portly side, there are more of them than rich people, making them a fatter target for the legislature.
This is another example of the modern technique of demonization: whenever you see a campaign against some social evil, the odds are good that a plump target is being primed for taxation. Are your kids fat? Obviously, you need to be taxed until you stop feeding them so much!
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Taxing fast food will come back as fiscally unsound
Why should Michigan legislature tax the foods that are exploiting the public?
This is not the answer to the obesity epidemic in America today. First fat is not a culprit of obesity. Nutrition 101, sugar is the enemy to childhood obesity and early juvenile diabetes. The genetically modified corn that is used to manufacture high fructose corn syrup is what must be removed from the American diet. I understand the soda pop industry meets with the tobacco industry researchers to identify how HFCS addiction is increasing their gross sales. It is known that the more HFCS one consumes the more of this addictive substance a person will crave. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ The soda pop industry gets rich and the rest of us get fat and sick. Who is going to pay for the increase in our health care?
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Stupid is what stupid does
Hey if moms want to got to the golden arches who are we to stop em?
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Why not pass a new licensing law to work in a fast-food restaurant?
Where will Citizen Joe get his job if he is required to get a license to flip burgers? At least the state can make money on the license, it could help spur the economy.
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Fat has nothing to do with it!
From what the research says it is not, fat it is sugar. We have become free-market fundamentalist allowing the oligarchs in the economy to trivialize the interest of the consumer to Socratic questioning when the answer is before our eyes.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Holding the parents responsible for thier children.
First and foremost what concerns me is that this bill will allow for yet another tax that those of us blue collar workers can not afford. For clarification here, my family and I do not eat at Fast Food Restaurants but maybe once a month and that is a special treat. We can not afford to eat there more than that.
Secondly, this proposed tax plan does not have a specific purpose defined. Is it not possible then that we will have a pile of tax dollars and then debate about what is the best use of this moeny to prevent child obesity.
My suggestions to you, if you are truly concerned about the safety and health of these children, why don't we utilize the social workers that we, the taxpayers are paying their salary, to educate the parents. If the parents do not want education, then it is time to go after them for child endangerment. This may seem far fetched, but look at the bills that have recently passed. You have to ticked parents because they will not buckle thier kids up or even put them into car seats.
Should the state be concerned about child safety, let's not add yet another program for these children by taxing people that can not afford any more tax, let's put the responsibility back on the parents to take care of their children like they should! I do not think that tax payers can support any more people, especially people that have the ability to do something about their obesity.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Fast food tax has potential
Go ahead and increase the cigarette tax, too. Thank you for looking out for our health and our children. Very thoughtful. Sorry others can't recognize it. It makes me so mad to see parents who could be saving for their kids' college spending money on cigarettes and setting a poor example for their kids. Sometimes you need to make the tough decisions for people's own good. I support this. Good luck getting some money to keep our Great Lakes and Water Sheds clean, too.
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Would make you stop and think
Save money of health care for businesses
|
|
-
-
crazycajun



- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
because they feel that we are sheeple, and need to be tended.
michigan constitution, article 1. Sec. 6.
Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.
keep your powder dry.
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (21 items)
|
|
|