Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 12-26-2006 10:30 PM by Anonymous Citizen. 115 replies.
Page 3 of 3 (116 items) < Previous 1 2 3
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 06-03-2006 8:46 PM In reply to

    sorry...

    didn't mean to poke fun... verbal judo is the "art" of de-escalating a situation...

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-03-2006 9:02 PM In reply to

    lets try it this way...

    what is it that you don't like about this legislation???

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-04-2006 7:47 AM In reply to

    No, so went to bed after than Cajun, report card stuff, you know

    .
  • 06-04-2006 7:49 AM In reply to

    I guess this legislation couldn't hurt. They don't do that already?

    Kids definitely get shot where I'm at.
  • 06-04-2006 8:05 AM In reply to

    It was FUNNY! I got out of the golf cart and "stepped up"

    I don't think he realized there was a girl there in the cart the way he was swearing. He'd been yelling "what's your insurance" and going on and on ranting and raving. Everybody came out to watch. As I walked forward he just walked away with his tail between his legs. Mind you I just said, "------, if the man wants your insurance, give him your insurance, that's why have insurance," as I walked right toward him and said it really loudly bringing even more people out to watch. He didn't even ask for an exchange of insurance information when I was done with him:) Don't get me wrong. He had every right to ask for it and be mad, but it was quite a scence. He was ready to fight, which wouldn't have gotten has car fixed, either. I made it win-win. He didn't go to jail for fighting, and my partner didn't have his insurance rates go up. That guy walked right up the stairs, to his dented car and left. It was all men. I think he just didn't know WHAT to do. My golf partner owes me big time. So you didn't offend me, I just had to go to bed.
  • 06-04-2006 8:09 AM In reply to

    I think they should have biometrix (Sp?) guns that won't work

    unless they are for the person they're registered to, so a kid couldn't use it, only the adult in the family. Could you work on that for me? I mean if they can scan me electronically in with a fingerprint at the tanner, then they can do that.
  • 06-04-2006 8:11 AM In reply to

    Nobody likes a bully.
  • 06-04-2006 3:12 PM In reply to

    My Two Cents

    I purchased a few handguns during the time I lived in Michigan. My prints are probably still on file at Mark Hackel's Hotel in Clinton Township. In order to purchase a handgun, Michigan law required the purchaser to first obtain a purchase permit at the local sheriff's office (it may now be administered through the PD). This meant being fingerprinted and identified. The permit was then only valid for a few days. Once the purchase was made, the buyer had to return to the sheriff with the gun and register the weapon. So...how many bad guys do you think have presented themselves to the local PD to be fingerprinted and identified in order to obtain a the permit in the first place? How silly is this? This bill is the solution to nothing. It's simply another layer of nonsense in the cumbersome process to lawfully purchase a weapon.
  • 06-04-2006 9:47 PM In reply to

    where are you?

    and what sort of drug dealer is getting away with shooting the kids that you and your neighbors are too worried about to find and "fix"?

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-04-2006 9:55 PM In reply to

    biometrics

    biometrics requires that a certain "identifiable" body part be put up against a sensor, then the "identification" can take place... all before the flippin thing will function. part of the responsibility of owning a weapon is keeping it out of the wrong hands. smith and wesson has been working on a "smart" pistol since the sixties... haven't sold one. the best safety is "between the ears" not "between the fingers"... if you want one, fine, don't complain when you die cuz the batteries went dead.

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-04-2006 10:01 PM In reply to

    enough of these...

    if they put enough layers between you and a getting a gun, then they will have disarmed you by default. i can not see a reason why law abiding citizens (subjects???) must get permission to get a handgun, then have to register it. i don't see anything where a CRIMINAL has to get permission to get a handgun... nothing... nada... zip... but the decent, law abiding, TAX PAYING folk DO. how left wing is that???????

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-05-2006 6:53 AM In reply to

    Hey, Now ...

    Here you harshly criticize the Michigan legislature’s long standing tradition of regulating the right to obtain and own a certain type of firearm. But aren’t you the one who not long ago cheered on this same legislature’s efforts to define and codify self defense rights that already have been well established and protected by common law? And aren’t you among those geniuses who argued extensively that individual self defense rights and interests would be better preserved and protected by the legislature than by the courts? “No man’s life, liberty or property are safe when the legislature is in session.” (Mark Twain) Michigan’s restrictive and burdensome pistol purchase and ownership laws are a perfect example of what happens when the legislature flexes its muscles and exercises its authority to monkey around with folks’ rights by “regulating” them. History tells us that legislatures invariably work toward diminishing and restricting rather than preserving and expanding individual rights.
  • 06-05-2006 8:17 AM In reply to

    my point exactly

    and when they DO once in a while make moves to expand access to a right, for whatever the purpose, we stand and congratulate them just as loudly as we condemn them when they dont.
  • 06-05-2006 8:18 AM In reply to

    guess i shoulda...

    logged on first....

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-05-2006 9:14 AM In reply to

    Shall I throw my body in front of them?

    What would you have us do to fix it?
  • 06-05-2006 9:52 AM In reply to

    Wrong Response

    The point is, that Michigan pistol restrictions you now complain about so bitterly are an accurate preview of what will happen to your self defense rights down the road, if the legislature succeeds in codifying them by statute. Eventually, those rights will be “regulated” away by the legislature. Instead of defending your self defense rights, as they have under Michigan common law for 150 years, the courts will be forced into turning their attention to interpreting the legislatively enacted statute. Not a good thing. “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” (George Satayana, 1905) “Only fools celebrate the traps they step into.” (Anonymous, 2006)
  • 06-05-2006 11:13 AM In reply to

    Reply to Wrong Response

    I don't know where you get the idea that "common law" is somehow sacred. The common law has been and continues to be molded and modified both by legislation and judicial opinion. The concept of pure stare decisis has become passe'. I put more faith in the elected legislature than in appointed judges. Even elected judges at the state level can get away with being far less responsive to voters than state representatives and senators. As before, this self-defense bill is nothing more than an affirmation of a traditional and fundamental right. A right that I believe should not be encumbered through the back door of the litigation lottery.
  • 06-05-2006 12:32 PM In reply to

    You Are Not Being Realistic

    For 150 years and without help or intervention from the legislature, Michigan courts have recognized and secured the individual's natural right to defend himself and his home against attacks. That same history shows the Michigan legislature has a marked proclivity to regulate, restrict and burden firearms acquisition and ownership. That, despite the state’s Constitution, which states, in Article I, Section 6, “Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.” Given history, how can you be confident the legislature, which now proposes to “give” you the right to self defense won’t soon decide to restrict the right over which it thus would seize control? (Answer: Realistically, you can’t be at all confident that the legislature will protect your right to self defense any more than it has protected every person's "right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.” You can be very confident that at some point in time the legislature will move to restrict your rights, though. That’s the lesson taught by history. Those who ignore the lesson are foolish.)
  • 06-05-2006 1:53 PM In reply to

    Realistic

    "Preemption" is a commonly known legal doctrine that can be very open to interpretation by judges. A few years ago, the state passed into law a measure to ensure that that local governmental units respected the state's standing to promulgate state-wide law and policy regarding the carrying of firearms. The law, as I recall, simply affirmed the state's legal position under the preemption doctrine, but on a specific issue. Later, when a local governmental unit did attempt to restrict concealed carry within its city limits (I forget which city...Milford?), the ordinance was overturned (yeay for that judge) based on the state statute affirming the old legal doctrine. If the affirming statute had not been in place and the judge had been so disposed, he could have ruled that preemption didn't apply. The precedent for other activists would have been set and Michigan could have ended up with a patchwork of concealed carry ordinances around the state. Again, the current bill doesn't break new ground (except that it returns some common-sense by restricting lawsuits). It isn't granting any new rights. It simply affirms -- and reinforces -- the traditional right of self defense. Therefore, I don't think that your fear that the legislature can "seize control" of the right by passing related legislation is founded: Could, for example, the Michigan legislature seize control of principles asserted in the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution simply because it initially passed a law recognizing that Amendment? "Affirming" is not "giving" and control is neither ceded nor assumed by the affirmation.
  • 06-06-2006 12:26 AM In reply to

    affirming...

    affirming is not giving... granted... but permission, registration, and "duty to retreat" are surely "taking away"... i'm not real keen on "implied consent" either...

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-06-2006 12:28 AM In reply to

    absolutely correct...

    the only way that we can "be sure" of anything is to elect those who think like us, not those who would be our nannies.

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-06-2006 12:32 AM In reply to

    you call...

    permission to purchase, "safety inspections", registration, and eventual confiscation PROTECTION?????? i'd like to see your idea of abolishment...

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-06-2006 12:34 AM In reply to

    maybe try...

    oh... i don't know.... how about ..... SHOOTING BACK!!!!!!!!

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-06-2006 12:35 AM In reply to

    OH...

    i forgot... you don't have your states PERMISSION to have a handgun...

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-06-2006 1:48 PM In reply to

    Just when I was starting to like you, Cajun, you had to speak again

    !
  • 06-06-2006 4:39 PM In reply to

    Actually

    the safety inspection is just a thinly veiled registration. I know on the little green cards that they gave me, it has a clear statement that absolves them of any responsibility if the firearm is actually not safe. Safety inspection was just a way to sell it to the sheeple.
  • 06-06-2006 9:53 PM In reply to

    i'm not here...

    for you to like me... i'm here for you to learn from me. you wouldn't be the first student that hated my guts till after he had to use something i taught him.
  • 06-06-2006 10:05 PM In reply to

    gotta get this

    signing on thing right...

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-06-2006 10:25 PM In reply to

    anonymity...

    is a wonderful cloak... warm and comfortable... i don't fear not being liked, i don't fear not being right, i'm not afraid of being incorrect, i stand up for what i believe in, freedom, liberty, and individuality. i am a citizen of this city, county, state and nation, not a puppet of it. come out from under your cloak so that we may welcome you up to the table where all citizens may heard, understood, and respected.

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-07-2006 8:41 AM In reply to

    Mackinaw Center for Public Policy Conservative group w/ a lot of power, $

    I don't think anyone should feel pressured to give their private information over to them. The site itself is wonderful so that that average citizen can make more informed decisions. Bravo. Just be aware WHO sets it up and that DeVos gives money to this, or so I've heard. Be smart and make informed decisions before you give your personal information out. Besides, as a politician, I'd want to know what people really THINK without being having them be afraid.
  • 06-07-2006 10:50 AM In reply to

    seizing control...

    if by seizing control you mean... offering tax incentives to purchase breathalyzer units and placing them in bars to gather evidence, tip-toeing around the proscriptions on law enforcement in the 4th amendment... or by condoning the use of 'selective enforcement' by posting several officers outside of events where alcohol is served, then stopping random vehicles for no other good reason,(it couldn't have been for a good reason, because when it was discovered that the occupants were not 'impaired', they were released with no other citations being issued. this happened dozens of times just this last weekend.)thus trampling on the theory of probable cause... or by making gun registration mandatory, this bypassing the necessity for a 4th amendment search... then, i'd have to say that they were pretty effective in 'seizing control' of the 4th amendment too...

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-07-2006 11:27 AM In reply to

    To The Reader, Everyone Is Essentially Anonymous Here

    Anyone who proclaims he is not seeking the cloak of anonymity while posting on forums like this under an obvious pseudonym like, say, “kookykrakpot” is delusional if he (she) believes his (her) own line of patter on that score, or is just a prattling hypocrite if he (she) doesn’t. One instance in which the real identity of a poster MAY be useful to readers of this forum is when the poster is in a position of authority to actually influence the outcome of a piece of legislation by voting on it as a member of the legislature, or vetoeing it or signing it into law as the state’s chief executive. Real identity also may be useful in evaluating the credence of a poster who claims to have some special expertise or personal experience pertinent to the topic and presents unverified “facts” without attribution. In reality, though, it’s what is said that should count. In a rational society, statements of opinion reinforced by substantial, attributed and verifiable facts are more informative (and possibly persuasive) than mere popping off with unsubstantiated claims that are intended to have emotional appeal. (Unfortunately, though, that doesn’t happen always or even frequently in any debate on public policy these days, by a long shot.)
  • 06-07-2006 12:06 PM In reply to

    Regarding anonymous comments

    Thanks. The value of this site is that you can really say what you think even though it is maintained by a conservative group that you may or may not agree with in overall philosophy. I think that's when you can really solve problems--when people/citizens are not afraid to speak the truth. Not that everything on here is the truth, credible or factual.
  • 06-22-2006 2:09 PM In reply to

    why do you have

    to get a permit? because LIBERALS DON'T TRUST YOU TO BE ARMED. why do you have to register your handgun? because LIBERALS DON'T TRUST YOU TO BE ARMED. why do you have to have the handgun "safety inspected? because LIBERALS DON'T TRUST YOU TO BE ARMED. AND THEY MIGHT HAVE MISSED YOU THE FIRST TIME AROUND.

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-24-2006 8:28 AM In reply to

    after watching

    (very closely) the helmet ban debate, and it's subsequent trip through the lawmaking process, i tend to agree with some of the posters who comment, "would the last one out of michigan please turn out the lights?" the "democratic process" was indeed apparent. a MAJORITY of the citizens, and their elected representatives supported this bill, but the DEMOCRATIC GOVERNOR vetoed it. this proves that she does not trust you to make intelligent, informed desicions about your own life, and she is bound and determined to make the state pay for your "excess insurance bills" TWO places where government in this state has NO BUSINESS going, granhomlm loves to tread.
  • 12-26-2006 10:30 PM In reply to

    nuryf blpgvxay

    tviqwcye xhdrmbal imgqaolz kxnbslap xeqpgitdj ulnica rhfjc
Page 3 of 3 (116 items) < Previous 1 2 3
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems