Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Home Blogs Forums
Forums » Michigan Votes » Criminal Law » 2005 House Bill 4092 (Ban certain multibladed devices)
Latest post 06-21-2006 1:53 PM by Anonymous Citizen. 47 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (48 items) < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next

  • 05-25-2006 11:57 AM In reply to

    A THOUGHT...

    Reply Contact
    here's a thought... how about ENFORCING the laws as they stand... tack on weapons charges to the already extensive list of offenses of the REAL CRIMINALS that would be arrested if they could get the law enforcement officers away from the bar parking lots waiting for a drunk driver to stagger out and get near his car... ooops... i'm sorry... REAL criminals don't pay the state thousands of dollars when they get caught... enforce the law, don't shoot fish in a barrel...

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 05-25-2006 1:02 PM In reply to

    You Hit That Right On The Head

    Reply Contact
    Repeat after me sheeple -- IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY OUR MONEY AND HOW THEY CAN GET MORE OF OUR MONEY!

  • 06-09-2006 10:26 AM In reply to

    ok...

    Reply Contact
    to paraphrase a lib from another thread on this site... show me 100 cases where someone has been killed or maimed by a multi-bladed device, and i'll believe that this law is a good idea. (not really, i'll NEVER believe that this law is a good idea...)

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 06-21-2006 8:02 AM In reply to

    because if he did...

    Reply Contact
    he couldn't advance the liberal agenda of disarming you completely.

  • 06-21-2006 8:34 AM In reply to

    Say What?

    Reply Contact
    "Don't feel bad though, many people think a knife is a knife is a knife and a gun is a gun is a gun. Its those people who vote without fully considering the details of the subject that scare the hell out of me." People that want to ban inanimate objects because they are on a power trip "scare the hell out of me". A gun or a knife never hurt anyone, even the scary looking ones that you would like to use as a first step towards disarming us.

  • 06-21-2006 8:37 AM In reply to

    Delusional

    Reply Contact
    "able to be swung in multiple directions without changing grip or hand position" If this scenario were correct you would only get to swing it once before taking one in the coconut. Your statement assumes that whoever is getting the knife swung at is unarmed. Don't ever bring a knife (even a scary one) to a gun fight.

  • 06-21-2006 8:38 AM In reply to

    This is why

    Reply Contact
    only property owners should be allowed to vote.

  • 06-21-2006 1:53 PM In reply to

    whatever happened to the

    Reply Contact
    concept of "bearing arms for the defense of yourelf and the state"? if you are carrying a knife, you are "armed", if "only" with a knife. as a previous poster said, never carry a knife to a gunfight. but i add, that every gunfighter i know ALSO carries a knife. it's not the THING, it's how you USE the thing that makes it a weapon.
Page 2 of 2 (48 items) < Previous 1 2
Copyright © 2008 Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Patent Pending. All rights reserved.
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems