|
Latest post 11-18-2009 9:09 AM by viewer. 16 replies.
-
01-01-2001 12:00 AM
|
|
-
Votes Admin


- Joined on 09-09-2008
|
2005 Senate Bill 129 (Establish sex offender parole restrictions )
Introduced in the Senate on February 1, 2005, to prohibit a person on the sexual offenders registry from living, working or loitering within 1,000 feet of a school, with certain exceptions for those convicted of less serious non-coercive crimes or for certain offences committed as a juvenile. Also, to allow courts to require an unlimited period of supervised probation for convicted child sex abusers, and require a minimum five year probation The vote was 33 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 not voting (Senate Roll Call 340 at Senate Journal 64) Click here to view bill details.
|
|
-
-
-
cmnsense05


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Mandatory minimums again?
WHY is the legislature wanting to go back to mandatory minimums without taking into account the particular circumstances of each case? Again they are taking discretion away from the courts concerning the length of probation, and for one specific type of crime... which can range from young people having consensual, underage sex (or touching) to the most serious sexual offense. ALL CSC offenses are grouped together as being equal, and this is wrong!
Is there money involved...the longer we keep someone on probation, the more money the State can make off of an individual?
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Has anyone ever heard of the slippery slope?
I'm going to be up front about this; I am an ex-sex offender and therefore have some bias on this issue. I served 12 years in prison, and discharged from my sentence. I thought I paid my debt to society. But first came registration, which I don't much like but I understand why it exists. Now the Senate attempted to dictate where I can live AFTER I discharged from my sentence. The Michigan Department of Corrections, including all parole and probation departments, no longer has jurisdiction over me because I served my time. Why is the Senate going to let me get on with my life? 12 years is a long time, and I'm not the same foolish kid I was at 21; people need to either let ex-cons put their lives together, or else shoot us in the head. It is hypocrisy to deny the death penalty because it is cruel and unusual punishment, then slowly siphon away the civil liberties of people that have already served their time. This seems to be the start of a bigger trend, and because sex offenders are an unpopular demographic, they are the testing ground for new government controls. You might laugh, I know I sound like a conspiracy theorist, but consider what was done with DNA; first sex offenders had to give DNA... then all felons... soon all misdemeanors... maybe next all those with traffic violations? Where does it end with governmental controls? More is never enough.
Signed, The Bruke. (look it up, it's in the FBI database)
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Why do they feel that they HAVE to put someone on the Sex Offender Registry for urinating in public,or mooning someone,etc.? I had the CPS agency come to my home once due to a complaint made by my sons school. My co worker sent me a e-card with 5 naked men with their hands covering their genitalia, just waving their hands in the air, and my son came into the computer room and saw it and told the kids about it at school the next day.(Typical Kid) Next thing I know, the teacher at my sons school called in a complaint to CPS, and they come out and investigate me and tell me they are investigating on a sex abuse suspician. They told me that I could be charged for sexual abuse and have to register if they dont dismiss it. They did however after I had to have my friend send in a letter and promised not to send me anything else of that nature,which is ludicrus,and I had to move my computer,which mind you I had no other internet hook up area feesable, I had to send in a letter of reasoning and apologize(For what?) I did nothing wrong, and I had to delete the e-card(no big deal) even though that was all a violation of my personal use and privacy. I was treated like a criminal/sex offender. Mean while I know 5 children who live with a child molester and cant prove it because they wont talk and theres no past charges on his last attempts many years ago. So, first of all, wheres the justice? Why does the system not know what is a real offender verses a non-offender. I know a kid who gave another kid in school a unergarment wedge, and he was charged for it and is on a sex offender registry. I have no clue why these non-violent nude acts/people such as urinating in public and etc. are being charged as sex offenders and having to register. They need to stop waisting there time on these people in court and investigating them when they need to go out there and use all our tax payer money going after the real sex offenders. Take them to court and investigate them on your clock. They need to loosen the laws a bit also on sex-abuse/molestation. If someone is suspected of it due to history and if the kids dont talk but someones aware of that persons nature, we need to beable to do a thourough investigation and investigate the kids to get them out of silence too. Thats why theres to many out there not registered yet. Go get the real offenders and lay off the people with minimal/small character defects. Fine the people for urinating in public and/or punishable up to 10 days in jail. Dont ruin there lives over this registry system.
|
|
-
-
viewer


- Joined on 11-18-2009
|
Re: 2005 Senate Bill 129 (Establish sex offender parole restrictions )
There are so many issues and emotions surrounding this subject. And so much confusion mixed with facts fiction and hype that it is hard to know when and what to say. Too many smug and self righteous attitudes combined with genuine fear loathing and anger to really reach out and touch some otherwise undisclosed truths.
This subject is not new. But the media siezes upon it whenever a ratings boost is needed or another issue needs to be clouded over.The public leaders and judicial system know that they have no effective response or any way to prevent it other than to impose truly draconian sentencing in order to show that they are at least doing something, anything about it. Even if that hasty effort clumsily destroys more lives than it claims to defend. The fact is that sexual abuse and molestation has been around since the beginning of civilisation and will be going on in some form or another till the end of it.
On every street in every neighborhood in every village town and city in America there is at least one household with a dark "Family Secret". If every single person,father,mother,brother,sister aunt,uncle,cousin,teacher, or trusted familyfriend or neighbor who has ever "done something" were to be brought in and have the "Secret" revealed and prosecuted there would be no room in the prisons for murderers, drug dealer, or terrorists!
Because there is such a desire to "keep it quiet" or "just in the family" so no one is embarrassed it causes a deep frustration that is manifested whenever there is such a disclosure of anyone caught outside the family. The suppressed rage is then unleashed in a whirlwind of anger and a blind desire for revenge and to burn the witches at the stake!!
It truly is a Scarlet Letter branded on ones forehead and for some that may be necessary. But to tar and feather with the same brush anyone who has ever had even a minor episode or made a mistake in this area is to truly throw the baby out with the bathwater. And since this message seems to be so full of cliches let me add one more that we should all be asking when it comes to pointing fingers and voicing condemnation......." WHATS IN YOUR WALLET????"""
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (17 items)
|
|
|