This law does nothing for you. There is a difference in working conditions, responsibilities, etc. between men taking people to lunch and you providing the real product/service. It would help you if you took people to lunch, but otherwise it does nothing for you. The work is not comparable.
Other than operating the same position on an assembly line on the same shift, I don't see where this law does anyone any good (and most of those jobs have union laws benefiting men with seniority in the union over younger women). Most other jobs are too much a factor of the actual assignments, the actual individual gifts you bring and the individual gifts others bring to have this law make any practical sense.
The bill does allow someone to play the lawsuit roulette game and maybe score big. You might have a dim jury that tries to compare 5 apples with three oranges and a pear decide each is comparable. The bill does raise costs for employers, and increase opportunities for lawyers.
By the way, item C makes it illegal to have life insurance rates different for men and women. It requires a blended rate, which benefits men and harms women. I'm not sure that's fair. It would also make it illegal to offer women pregnancy leave and not offer men paternity leave of comparable length.