Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 09-09-2007 7:10 PM by Anonymous Citizen. 2 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2004 Senate Bill 1447 (Expand delinquent child support liens )

    Introduced in the Senate on October 6, 2004, to establish that with certain exceptions the lien placed on a delinquent child support payer’s assets includes distributions from a decedent's estate, certain lawsuit or settlement winnings, funds from a worker's compensation award, or funds from an arbitration award. This is in addition to other assets that current law already allows to be encumbered. The bill also revises other details of the law that authorizes such liens

    The vote was 35 in favor, 0 opposed and 3 not voting

    (Senate Roll Call 802 at Senate Journal 102)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 08-25-2007 10:43 AM In reply to

    help save children right,then money problem will be solved

    SB 727-Stupid is as Stupid Does. Newspapers reported the ,Governor passed a new Grandparent Law and have defined words fit parent new family unit, and all same required provisions. Newspapers should get it right, Senate indications of levels of downfail of best interest factors are Controled by Supreme Courts. SUPREME COURTS SHOULD NOT RULE THE DECISIONS OF THE LAW MAKERS LEGISLATURE IN DUTY TO ITS VOTERS RIGHTS. WHY DID LEGISLATURE PUSH OUT PERFECT PROVISION OF ADOPTION BY STEPPARENT OR GRANDPARENT DOES NOT CUT VISITATION. what they didNot have anymore room left with all that other negitive remarks ,now grandparents have to be perfect prima facto. WORDS "OR GRANDPARENTS DO NOT INTERFERE with the parents rights org. if child rights matter,then a child sees adopted grandparents as just granparent and is Not a new family unit. Now inhertance to be given a part of child support seems only fair, if you then must allow granparent to continue bond,after all if a child adopted by one side grandparents,but the adoptee child can receive money from both sides. heir laws, then it should be a fact law equal common sense to input a simple Law. to put back the words that was take out of sb767 of Adoption by "OR GRANDPARENTS in the 1st degree does Not prohibit visitation bond. Given rights to one should Not be forced away from another. Oh well, forgot words "OR Grandparents , Now the whole social mistake of left out provision has downfail effect on a Child Right to continued bond with grandparents. All sides have Lost. RETURN WORDS "OR GRANDPARENTS" BACK INTO LAWS.
  • 09-09-2007 7:10 PM In reply to

    Children need support and Love

    Child support and visitation go together,unless one parent is totally unfit. but if parent pays,it must mean he is fit enough to do so,and should have visit with children. Money owned for back child support,should be taken from sale of boat,cars,etc. Children need support,and love. But if parent is Not biological parent,dna proofen then,NO money should be owned,only by real bio-man Inheritance by way of will,should Not be taken,in fact the money was Not earned created by payee. Children need both parents,both sets grandparents. Votes Yes,to ADD -Children adopted by a 1st degree grandparent,other 1st.degree have right to visits.
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems