Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 09-14-2006 11:14 AM by Anonymous Citizen. 96 replies.
Page 3 of 3 (97 items) < Previous 1 2 3
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 12-20-2004 7:08 PM In reply to

    Do this

    You can do this by logging on to abateofmichigan.org Get informed, get involved, we will beat this.
  • 12-22-2004 2:34 PM In reply to

    The Bill Died In the Senate 2004 now what ?

    James L Koetje wrote to explain to me it passed (he voted for it),, But it died in the Senate. Now what is the next step ??
  • 12-22-2004 2:41 PM In reply to

    my mistake - didnt read soryy.

    my questions were answered already- i just needed to read.
  • 01-19-2005 12:19 PM In reply to

    new info?

    The last time region 15 updated there helmet law page is 2/1/04. is there another region with current info?
  • 03-09-2005 11:20 PM In reply to

    Ignorance

    Please look down the list again and read the deffinition of ignorance. Studies show that states with a choice or no helmet requirement at all have a lower fatality rate than Michigan! As much as 40% lower in some cases! These are studies done my the NHTSA and the AMA and numerous institutes around the country!
  • 03-16-2005 8:56 AM In reply to

    helmets brak necks!

    I may be alive because I didn't have the weight of a helmet snap my neck. Instead I got a cut on the skull fortunately, only. A slight gash of the skin cap of the skull.
  • 03-16-2005 9:01 AM In reply to

    Necks "Break" with helmet weight whiplash

    Try riding a solid mounted motor in a big v-twin motorcycle with a full faced helmet. You might see your vision blurred, by the helmet weight altering the view with the vibration; let alone a sudden stop.
  • 03-16-2005 12:20 PM In reply to

    Time for a choice

    It's time for the motorcycle rider to make his own choice on whether to wear a helmet or not. I have been riding for almost 40 years so I know a little bit about this subject, a helmet cuts down on hearing cuts down on vision and will not help on any speed over 25. There is no state that borders Michigan that has a helmet law, when I have a few days off I head to one of those states to have the pleasure of riding without a helmet, I think that most riders from those states will not go to the trouble of putting on(or buying)a helmet just so they can ride in Michigan. It's time for a CHOICE.
  • 03-17-2005 9:33 PM In reply to

    Grumblegutz Uber Alles

    Doody, doody, drop a beauty. Ah what joyous fardles do I bear? Helen Gill Viljoen was the worst professor I ever had at Queens College in NYC. What a doddering and mean-spirited and BORING old bitch she was. And her work on John Ruskin has been subsequently shown to be totally askew and incorrect on most interpretations. What a moron. Have a lovely day.
  • 03-18-2005 11:43 AM In reply to

    Stop forcing the issue

    I believe every rider should have the right to wear or not to wear a helment. Look at the statistics in other states that do not require helmets to be warn. Their survival rate is no lower than that of Michigan, which states that the whole issue is just control. Give it up. LET THE BIKERS CHOOSE! Thanks, Brigid
  • 03-18-2005 1:49 PM In reply to

    Reply to "Necks 'Break'"

    You must ride Harley! Try quality motorcycle and you won't have that vibration problem. ...Just kidding. Good luck to the sponsors of this new bill from Colorado.
  • 03-23-2005 8:29 AM In reply to

    no helmets

    WELL SAID
  • 03-31-2005 1:41 PM In reply to

    Helmet Law

    Give the rider a choice as to wear a helemt or not while operating a motorcycle. Educate drivers to look out for motorcycles. With the price of gasoline on the rise more and more bikes will be on the road.
  • 01-31-2006 12:18 AM In reply to

    MY CHOICE

    EACH PERSON SHOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE HIS OR HER CHOICE ON WEARING A HELMET.THIS COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED ON THE BELIEF IN, "FREEDOM OF CHOICE". PEOPLE ARE QUICK TO SUPPORT A LAW THAT TAKES SOMEONE ELSES FREEDOM, SO LONG AS IT DOES NOT EFFECT THEM! HOW ABOUT?????? ANTI-SMOKING LAW.... NO LONGER WILL TOBACO PRODUCTS BE LEGAL. THE SURGEON GENERAL HAS DETERMINED SMOKING IS BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH, AND HAS CONTRIBUTED TO THE DEATH OF THOUSANDS. ANTI-DRINKING LAW... NO LONGER WILL BEVERAGES WITH ANY FORM OF LIQUOR BE LEGAL. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT TOO MANY DEATHS AND INJURIES HAVE OCCURED DUE TO DRINKING. ANTI-ROCK CLIMBING, SKYDIVING, MOUNTAIN CLIMBING, NASCAR RACING, SWIMMING ON A FULL STOMACH LAW... YOU GET MY POINT! MY LIFE, MY CHOICE, MY FREEDOM! WHO WILL BE THE NEXT TO BE TOLD, "SORRY,THATS AGAINST THE LAW, YOUR RISKING YOUR LIFE, WE'LL MAKE THE DECISION FOR YOU!"
  • 07-06-2006 11:37 AM In reply to

    is there

    guaranteed 100% coverage mandated for automobile drivers? one that covers EVERY PENNY of medical expenses that those drivers create by driving while on a cell phone? no. why should there be for motorcycles? insurance companies don't want to cover much these days, especially "total catastrophic medical coverage". they are getting a little queazy over "flood coverage" too.

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 09-13-2006 10:55 PM In reply to

    freedom

    what ever happened to the freedom of choice
  • 09-14-2006 11:14 AM In reply to

    It's Gone

    The dem/socialist nannys know whats best for you. Just trust them.
Page 3 of 3 (97 items) < Previous 1 2 3
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems