Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 10-04-2007 10:01 AM by Anonymous Citizen. 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2001 House Bill 4635 (Revise paternity determination laws)

    Introduced in the House on April 19, 2001, to accommodate the use of new genetic testing technology to allow nonbiological fathers recourse when they discovered that they were paying child support for children who were not their biological offspring. This is part of a legislative package comprised of House Bills 4535-4538. House Bills 4535 and 4636 would allow requests to vacate paternity determinations, the termination of certain child support orders, and the cancellation of child support arrearages under certain circumstances. House Bill 4637 would allow the transfer of Friend of the Court documents under certain circumstances. And House Bill 4638 would make it a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for up to two years or a fine of up to $1,000 to knowingly misidentify a man as a biological father with the intent to deceive in an adoption proceeding

    The vote was 102 in favor, 0 opposed and 7 not voting

    (House Roll Call 425 at House Journal 59)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 08-17-2007 11:50 AM In reply to

    TRICK OR TREAT

    722.714(6)DNA PROOF PATERNITY PRESUMED,ITS THE LAW. 722.716-PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS RIGHTS,ITS THE LAW. 722.717 (D)ORDER DEFAULT JUDGEMENT,TRICKY DICKY IS SENT OUT BEFORE,DNA TEST,OR A RIGHT TO PRETRIAL. IF THE NEW LAW SAYS=A MOTION DENIED,IF A MAN KNEW HE WAS NOT BIOLOGICAL FATHER DNA PROOF 6 MONTH BEFORE, THEN DEFAULT FRAUD ORDER SHOULD NOT BE SENT UNTIL, IF A COURT AGENCY KNEW OF DNA PROOF 6 MONTH BEFORE. "ONE PERSON IS GIVEN A RIGHT TO JUSTICE BY LAW,BUT THEN ANOTHER PERSON IS DENIED SAME RIGHTS, JUST BECAUSE AGENCY DONOT FOLLOW THE WRITTEN LAWS. LAW GIVES WOMEN(person)A RIGHT TO USE DNA PROOF UP TO 10 YEARS TO COLLECT CHILD SUPPORT. SAME RIGHTS BY LAW SHOULD BE GIVEN MEN(person)USE DNA PROOF UP TO 10 YEARS. IF YOUR GOING TO INPUT A NEW LAW THEN --WHY PUT A MOTION DENIED IF A MAN KNEW HE WAS NOT THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER DNA PROOF 6 MONTH. -----MAKE NO SENSE---DISCRIMINATION--FRAUD TRICK BUT NOW LEGISLATURE IS CHICKEN CONTRADICTIONS INPUTING A LAW MEN ONLY HAVE 6 MONTHS,THEN THE SAME LAW MUST APPLIED TO MOTHERS,AGENCYS HAS TO MOTHERS AND COURT AGENCYS SHALL NOT SEND DEFAULT ORDER IF THEY KNEW OF DNA PROOF OF NON PATERNITY INNOCENT MAN 6 MONTHS BEFORE. EQUAL JUSTICE. IF A MAN KNOW HE IS NOT BIOLOGICAL LEGAL FATHER , HE IS DONE, SHOULD NOT BE FORCED TO DEFAULT ORDER CHILD SUPPORT,SHOULD NOT HAVE TO GO TO COURT TO PROVE ANYMORE,SEND DNA PROOF TO AGENCYS,HE,S DONE. THE LAWS ARE THERE TO PROTECT INNOCENT, NOT JUST TO GIVE ONLY 6 MONTHS TO PROOF IT OR YOU WILL BECOME ANOTHER MANS PATERNITY SLAVE FOR 18 YEARS. AGAIN LEGISTURE IS GIVEN IN TO UNJUSTICE FRAUD ALLOW FRAUD TO CONTINUE,ALLOWING REAL BIO-MEN TO GO OUT AND FATHER MORE, NOT PAY FOR IT, THEY KNOW IN 6MONTHS A INNOCENT MAN WILL BE THERE SLAVE. THEN YOU MUST PASS A LAW THAT STATES SAME RIGHTS. EXAMPLE- ADD PUT UNDER 722.717- DEFAULT ORDER -DEFAULT ORDERS SHALL NOT BE SEND IF COURTS AGENCY OR MOTHERS KNEW OF DNA TEST PROOFING NON PATERNITY A MAN WAS NOT THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER 6 MONTH BEFORE 6 MONTHS AFTER A MOTION OF CHILD SUPPORT. OR THE MOTION WILL BE DENIED.IF THEY KNEW OF DNA PROFILE. YOU CAN NOT MAKE UP NEW LAW, SET ASIDE THE RIGHTS TO ONE PERSON, GIVE IMMUNITY TO ANOTHER. 722.716 PRETRIAL IS THERE, BUT YET THAT LAW IS NOT FOLLOWED BY COURTS. 722.714(6) DNA TEST PATERNITY PRESUMED. ITS A LAW, THAT IS NOT FOLLOW IN ORDER. WHY--BECAUSE YOU MAKE UP NEW LAWS TO OUTPUT ABOVE LAWS PROVISIONS,THATS ALREADY THERE, NOT FOLLOWED BY THE COURT AGENCY, JUDGES, OR LAWYERS OR MOTHERS WITH ALL THE UNLESS, EXCEPT,IF,CIRCUMSTANCES. EVERYONE KNOWS IT IS ""DEFAULT FRAUD ORDERS" GIVE A MAN ONLY 14 DAYS, THEN PAYCHECK DEFAULTED. -IF A MAN KNEW HE WAS NOT THE FATHER,DNA PROOF, HE IS DONE IT IS NO LONGER HIS PROBLEM, IT SI THE MOTHERS DUTY,COURT AGENCY JOB, LAWYERS DUTY TO SEE THAT JUSTICE IS DONE, GO AFTER THE BIOLOGICAL MAN. THERE IS NOT TO BE EXCUSES,A BIOLOGICAL MAN CAN BE FOUND,SSCARD IF HE WORKS,IT IS NOT THE DUTY OF A INNOCENT NON-BIOLOGICAL MAN TO FIGURE OUT,WORRY TO BE INVOLVED WITH COURT FRAUDS,MOTHERS AFFAIRS, OR WHOS THE DADDY.OR WHOS GOING BE PAYING. IF YOUR NOT GOING TO GIVE JUSTICE TO ALL LIBERTY WHY SCREW UP THE LAWS THAT ARE ALREADY THERE. YES IT IS SAD THAT WOMEN GET TALKED INTO AFFAIR, OR SEX, THEN MENBASTARD RUNS WHEN GETS BABY APPEAR BUT GET THE REAL RUN AWAY MENBASTARD TO PAY. IF A MAN KNEW HE IS NOT BIOLOGICAL SPERM DONOR- WITH DNA TEST PROOF-HE IS DONE-NO LONGER HIS FAULT IF IT HAS BEEN 6 MONTH OR 6 YEARS. HE IS DONE, HE HAS A RIGHT NOT TO BE DEFAULTED OR FRAUDED IF A MAN PAYS AND WORKS FOR ANOTHER MANS FAULTS THAT INNOCENT MAN BECOME A SLAVE. --------STOP- PATERNITY SLAVE
  • 09-11-2007 9:56 AM In reply to

    i'm tire of women not knowing who there baby's daddy is...

    I firing mad and if I could have a talk show it would be called, "Stop the Drama" I'm tired of women not being honest. don't trap a man, the NON Biological father because he is financially secured or carry a regular job, just to let the man that is the BIOLOGICAL father run free. It is the worst thing you can do. My husband, I love dearly is NOT the biological father in our case. He like many other men came to being unsure of conception time and step up to avoid going to jail and paid the Michigan Friend of the Court. She dangled him for 10yrs, told him over the phone he wasn't the father and told Friend of the Court he was, until I came into his life and wanted to know the TRUTH. After DNA findings he was NOT the father. Instead of her backing out and admitting that she was lying she asked for a buyout.. can you imagine? buyout the past due with friend of the court and he can be free. He has no attachments to the child and he doesn't have an attachment to her. She's so bitter and it's really not fair to me. I need for someone in a political position to help the many, many men that get set up by these women. Again, I stand firm if a mandatory DNA, had been done before it went to Friend of the court then my husband would not be as stressed as he has INVOLUNTARILY taking care of anther man's child.
  • 10-04-2007 10:01 AM In reply to

    Posted by anonymous,a Judge said it

    Posted by anonymous ,no one is calling you a bastard child, the remarks on the post was what a Judge and Fia Agent had said to a innocent father(noOne you know) who was being frauded by court system, Judge said it(bastardchild). Thats how a'S some Judges and Court agency is,the Well,bottom line is mothers need to make sure and Judges doNot care about justice or children who need real dad or just a dad, judges need to watch there big mouths.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems