Most Recent Comments

1) Rep. Sheen's "no vote explanation" [by Admin003 on November 13, 2003]
Rep. Sheen, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I do not believe that the tobacco companies that were not in existence when the offense on which the original companies settled should be taxed or put at a disadvantage for what they had no part."
Reply

2) 2003 House Bill 5221 [by admin on January 1, 2001]
Introduced in the House on November 4, 2003, to impose a 35-cent per pack "equity assessment" on the sale of cigarettes by tobacco companies which are not parties to the 1998 tobacco settlement. The companies would be required to annually prepay the "assessment" for the coming year, based on a sales estimate made by the Department of Treasury. This refers to the multi-billion dollar out-of-court settlement between tobacco companies and 46 states for compensation to state taxpayers for the increased cost they may have incurred for the medical care for thousands of smokers. The Senate Fiscal Agency estimates that Michigan’s share of the settlement will average around $300 million a year for the next several years. This bill will levy approximately $3 million in additional "assessments"

The vote was 84 in favor, 18 opposed and 8 not voting

(House Roll Call 629 at House Journal 86)

Click here to view bill details.
Reply

View Full Conversation