Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2003 Senate Bill 509: Impose "driver responsibility fees" (House Roll Call 448)
facebook  twitter 

Passed 67 to 40 in the House on July 16, 2003, to concur with an amended Senate-passed version of the bill, which adds an assessment for driving under the influence of a controlled substance.
View All of Senate Bill 509: History, Amendments & Comments 

The vote was 67 in favor, 40 against, and 3 not voting.
(House Roll Call 448 at House Journal 62)

Print-friendly version

 Comment on this vote   View others' comments   Add to scorecard 

Line

Vote
In Favor In Favor
Against Against
Not Voting Not Voting
Undecided
Democrat
703070%
277327%
2982%
47 total votes
Republican
534753%
425842%
3973%
63 total votes
Voters
1000%
100100%
1000%
3 total votes

What do you think? In Favor Against Undecided (log on required)

Line

Impose "driver responsibility fees"

IN FAVOR

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

Accavitti (D)Adamini (D)Anderson (D)Brown (D)Byrum (D)
Cheeks (D)Clack (D)Daniels (D)Dennis (D)Elkins (D)
Farrah (D)Gillard (D)Gleason (D)Hopgood (D)Hunter (D)
Jamnick (D)Kolb (D)Lipsey (D)McConico (D)Minore (D)
Murphy (D)O'Neil (D)Plakas (D)Reeves (D)Sak (D)
Spade (D)Stallworth (D)Tobocman (D)Vagnozzi (D)Whitmer (D)
Williams (D)Wojno (D)Zelenko (D)  

HOUSE REPUBLICANS

Casperson (R)Caul (R)DeRossett (R)Ehardt (R)Emmons (R)
Gaffney (R)Hager (R)Howell (R)Huizenga (R)Johnson, Rick (R)
Julian (R)Koetje (R)Kooiman (R)LaJoy (R)LaSata (R)
Middaugh (R)Moolenaar (R)Mortimer (R)Newell (R)Nofs (R)
Palsrok (R)Pappageorge (R)Pastor (R)Pumford (R)Richardville (R)
Shulman (R)Stakoe (R)Stewart (R)Van Regenmorter (R)VanderVeen (R)
Voorhees (R)Walker (R)Ward (R)Wenke (R) 

AGAINST

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

Bieda (D)Condino (D)Gieleghem (D)Hardman (D)Hood (D)
Law (D)Meisner (D)Paletko (D)Rivet (D)Sheltrown (D)
Smith (D)Waters (D)Woodward (D)  

HOUSE REPUBLICANS

Acciavatti (R)Amos (R)Bisbee (R)Bradstreet (R)Brandenburg (R)
Caswell (R)DeRoche (R)Drolet (R)Farhat (R)Garfield (R)
Hoogendyk (R)Hummel (R)Hune (R)Johnson, Ruth (R)Meyer (R)
Milosch (R)Nitz (R)Palmer (R)Robertson (R)Rocca (R)
Shackleton (R)Shaffer (R)Sheen (R)Stahl (R)Steil (R)
Tabor (R)Woronchak (R)   

HOUSE LEGISLATORS WHO DID NOT VOTE

Hart (R)Phillips (D)Taub (R)

HOUSE LEGISLATORS ALL VOTES

Y    Accavitti (D)  n  Acciavatti (R)Y    Adamini (D)  n  Amos (R)Y    Anderson (D)
  n  Bieda (D)  n  Bisbee (R)  n  Bradstreet (R)  n  Brandenburg (R)Y    Brown (D)
Y    Byrum (D)Y    Casperson (R)  n  Caswell (R)Y    Caul (R)Y    Cheeks (D)
Y    Clack (D)  n  Condino (D)Y    Daniels (D)Y    Dennis (D)  n  DeRoche (R)
Y    DeRossett (R)  n  Drolet (R)Y    Ehardt (R)Y    Elkins (D)Y    Emmons (R)
  n  Farhat (R)Y    Farrah (D)Y    Gaffney (R)  n  Garfield (R)  n  Gieleghem (D)
Y    Gillard (D)Y    Gleason (D)Y    Hager (R)  n  Hardman (D)  -  Hart (R)
  n  Hood (D)  n  Hoogendyk (R)Y    Hopgood (D)Y    Howell (R)Y    Huizenga (R)
  n  Hummel (R)  n  Hune (R)Y    Hunter (D)Y    Jamnick (D)Y    Johnson, Rick (R)
  n  Johnson, Ruth (R)Y    Julian (R)Y    Koetje (R)Y    Kolb (D)Y    Kooiman (R)
Y    LaJoy (R)Y    LaSata (R)  n  Law (D)Y    Lipsey (D)Y    McConico (D)
  n  Meisner (D)  n  Meyer (R)Y    Middaugh (R)  n  Milosch (R)Y    Minore (D)
Y    Moolenaar (R)Y    Mortimer (R)Y    Murphy (D)Y    Newell (R)  n  Nitz (R)
Y    Nofs (R)Y    O'Neil (D)  n  Paletko (D)  n  Palmer (R)Y    Palsrok (R)
Y    Pappageorge (R)Y    Pastor (R)  -  Phillips (D)Y    Plakas (D)Y    Pumford (R)
Y    Reeves (D)Y    Richardville (R)  n  Rivet (D)  n  Robertson (R)  n  Rocca (R)
Y    Sak (D)  n  Shackleton (R)  n  Shaffer (R)  n  Sheen (R)  n  Sheltrown (D)
Y    Shulman (R)  n  Smith (D)Y    Spade (D)  n  Stahl (R)Y    Stakoe (R)
Y    Stallworth (D)  n  Steil (R)Y    Stewart (R)  n  Tabor (R)  -  Taub (R)
Y    Tobocman (D)Y    Vagnozzi (D)Y    Van Regenmorter (R)Y    VanderVeen (R)Y    Voorhees (R)
Y    Walker (R)Y    Ward (R)  n  Waters (D)Y    Wenke (R)Y    Whitmer (D)
Y    Williams (D)Y    Wojno (D)  n  Woodward (D)  n  Woronchak (R)Y    Zelenko (D)

House Roll Call 448 on 2003 Senate Bill 509

Line

Comments

Re: 2003 Senate Bill 509 (Impose "driver responsibility fees" )  by victor88 on September 15, 2012 
I am not sure what to think about these fees at all. They should not be doing these fees at all. This is so wrong to charge people these fees. This has to change. click here

Re: 2003 Senate Bill 509 (Impose "driver responsibility fees" )  by bill35 on September 12, 2012 
They need to stop these fees in the future. They are definitely getting way out of control here. Not sure what to think about it. computer support orlando

Re: Give Me A Break  by Cmmn_snse on February 13, 2010 

 I'm pleased to see that officers have empathy for the high fines associated with traffic offenses.   Government is ineffective and revenue has to be made up somewhere.  However, from someone who works in a casino and witnesses it every day (dumb luck occurs) Seven (7) points is not much and a few times in the wrong place at the wrong time can occur,  so please show some compassion.  The only thing I ask of police officers is with the drinking laws so devasating, try not to make all your arrests the east way (pulling anyone over random drivers between 1:30 a.m. and 2:15 a.m.) because the problems drinkers aren't out at that time.  I understand you can pull anyone over at that time and make an arrest a high percentage.  The problem with that is the one's that hurt innocent people that drink every day don't drive in those periods.


 


In genereal you are spot on, when you state that American love to blame someone else.   In most cases the poorest drivers have the most points, 



View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.