Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2011 Senate Bill 409: Revise income tax on pensions detail (House Roll Call 494)
facebook  twitter 

Passed 108 to 1 in the House on June 14, 2012, to exempt from the state income tax pension income received from working for a government agency whose employees were not covered by Social Security (which means they paid no payroll tax and received no Social Security credits while employed there).
View All of Senate Bill 409: History, Amendments & Comments 

The vote was 108 in favor, 1 against, and 1 not voting.
(House Roll Call 494)

Print-friendly version

 Comment on this vote   View others' comments   Add to scorecard 

Line

Vote
In Favor In Favor
Against Against
Not Voting Not Voting
 Undecided
Republican
100100%
1000%
1000%
63 total votes
Democrat
95595%
2982%
2982%
47 total votes

What do you think? In Favor Against Undecided (log on required)

Line

Revise income tax on pensions detail

IN FAVOR

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

Ananich (D)Barnett (D)Bauer (D)Bledsoe (D)Brown (D)
Brunner (D)Byrum (D)Cavanagh (D)Clemente (D)Constan (D)
Darany (D)Dillon (D)Durhal (D)Greimel (D)Hammel (D)
Haugh (D)Hobbs (D)Hovey-Wright (D)Howze (D)Irwin (D)
Jackson (D)Kandrevas (D)Lane (D)LeBlanc (D)Lindberg (D)
Lipton (D)Liss (D)McCann (D)Meadows (D)Nathan (D)
Oakes (D)Olumba (D)Rutledge (D)Santana (D)Schmidt, R. (D)
Segal (D)Slavens (D)Smiley (D)Stallworth (D)Stapleton (D)
Switalski (D)Talabi (D)Tlaib (D)Townsend (D)Womack (D)

HOUSE REPUBLICANS

Agema (R)Bolger (R)Bumstead (R)Callton (R)Cotter (R)
Crawford (R)Daley (R)Damrow (R)Denby (R)Farrington (R)
Forlini (R)Foster (R)Franz (R)Genetski (R)Gilbert (R)
Glardon (R)Goike (R)Graves (R)Haines (R)Haveman (R)
Heise (R)Hooker (R)Horn (R)Hughes (R)Huuki (R)
Jacobsen (R)Jenkins (R)Johnson (R)Knollenberg (R)Kowall (R)
Kurtz (R)LaFontaine (R)Lori (R)Lund (R)Lyons (R)
MacGregor (R)MacMaster (R)McBroom (R)McMillin (R)Moss (R)
Muxlow (R)Nesbitt (R)O'Brien (R)Olson (R)Opsommer (R)
Ouimet (R)Outman (R)Pettalia (R)Poleski (R)Potvin (R)
Price (R)Pscholka (R)Rendon (R)Rogers (R)Schmidt, W. (R)
Shaughnessy (R)Shirkey (R)Somerville (R)Stamas (R)Tyler (R)
Walsh (R)Yonker (R)Zorn (R)  


AGAINST

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

Geiss (D)

HOUSE REPUBLICANS
none


HOUSE LEGISLATORS WHO DID NOT VOTE

Stanley (D)



HOUSE LEGISLATORS ALL VOTES

Y    Agema (R)Y    Ananich (D)Y    Barnett (D)Y    Bauer (D)Y    Bledsoe (D)
Y    Bolger (R)Y    Brown (D)Y    Brunner (D)Y    Bumstead (R)Y    Byrum (D)
Y    Callton (R)Y    Cavanagh (D)Y    Clemente (D)Y    Constan (D)Y    Cotter (R)
Y    Crawford (R)Y    Daley (R)Y    Damrow (R)Y    Darany (D)Y    Denby (R)
Y    Dillon (D)Y    Durhal (D)Y    Farrington (R)Y    Forlini (R)Y    Foster (R)
Y    Franz (R)  n  Geiss (D)Y    Genetski (R)Y    Gilbert (R)Y    Glardon (R)
Y    Goike (R)Y    Graves (R)Y    Greimel (D)Y    Haines (R)Y    Hammel (D)
Y    Haugh (D)Y    Haveman (R)Y    Heise (R)Y    Hobbs (D)Y    Hooker (R)
Y    Horn (R)Y    Hovey-Wright (D)Y    Howze (D)Y    Hughes (R)Y    Huuki (R)
Y    Irwin (D)Y    Jackson (D)Y    Jacobsen (R)Y    Jenkins (R)Y    Johnson (R)
Y    Kandrevas (D)Y    Knollenberg (R)Y    Kowall (R)Y    Kurtz (R)Y    LaFontaine (R)
Y    Lane (D)Y    LeBlanc (D)Y    Lindberg (D)Y    Lipton (D)Y    Liss (D)
Y    Lori (R)Y    Lund (R)Y    Lyons (R)Y    MacGregor (R)Y    MacMaster (R)
Y    McBroom (R)Y    McCann (D)Y    McMillin (R)Y    Meadows (D)Y    Moss (R)
Y    Muxlow (R)Y    Nathan (D)Y    Nesbitt (R)Y    O'Brien (R)Y    Oakes (D)
Y    Olson (R)Y    Olumba (D)Y    Opsommer (R)Y    Ouimet (R)Y    Outman (R)
Y    Pettalia (R)Y    Poleski (R)Y    Potvin (R)Y    Price (R)Y    Pscholka (R)
Y    Rendon (R)Y    Rogers (R)Y    Rutledge (D)Y    Santana (D)Y    Schmidt, R. (D)
Y    Schmidt, W. (R)Y    Segal (D)Y    Shaughnessy (R)Y    Shirkey (R)Y    Slavens (D)
Y    Smiley (D)Y    Somerville (R)Y    Stallworth (D)Y    Stamas (R)  -  Stanley (D)
Y    Stapleton (D)Y    Switalski (D)Y    Talabi (D)Y    Tlaib (D)Y    Townsend (D)
Y    Tyler (R)Y    Walsh (R)Y    Womack (D)Y    Yonker (R)Y    Zorn (R)

House Roll Call 494 on 2011 Senate Bill 409

Line

Comments

1) Re: 2011 Senate Bill 409 (Revise income tax on pensions detail )  by Judy on December 13, 2012 
Senator Johnson's statement is as follows:
I rise today to give my colleagues yet another opportunity to set things right with Michigan's retirees. The bill that
is before us is an attempt to fix the ill-conceived pension tax that was moved quickly before all its effects had been
fully thought-out. We're now giving an exemption to police and firefighters because many of them do not collect
Social Security.
I offer an amendment that will eliminate all aspects of this poorly-written and job-killing pension tax. What better
gift to give our seniors this holiday season than to get rid of the tax hike that the Governor levied on them. We could
also give a gift to small businesses by freeing up $300 million for seniors to reinvest in this economy. The idea of
raising taxes on people living on fixed incomes to pay for tax breaks for the Governor's CEO buddies was wrong
from the start, and we talked about it all last year.
Our seniors have worked hard to earn their pensions. They shouldn’t have to choose between medications or food
because of this Republican tax hike. This year's been marked by attack after attack on Michigan citizens, asking
them to make great sacrifices while corporations, in fact, reap the benefits. Let's go home with a clear conscience,
knowing that we did something to help, rather than to harm, our elder population. If tax breaks are good for
business, then they must be good for seniors as well. Here's your chance to support lower taxes by supporting my
amendment.

Line

2) Re: 2011 Senate Bill 409 (Revise income tax on pensions detail )  by Judy on December 13, 2012 
Senator Johnson asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the statement be
printed in the Journal.
The motion prevailed.
Senator Johnson's statement is as follows:
I rise today to give my colleagues yet another opportunity to set things right with Michigan's retirees. The bill that
is before us is an attempt to fix the ill-conceived pension tax that was moved quickly before all its effects had been
fully thought-out. We're now giving an exemption to police and firefighters because many of them do not collect
Social Security.
I offer an amendment that will eliminate all aspects of this poorly-written and job-killing pension tax. What better
gift to give our seniors this holiday season than to get rid of the tax hike that the Governor levied on them. We could
also give a gift to small businesses by freeing up $300 million for seniors to reinvest in this economy. The idea of
raising taxes on people living on fixed incomes to pay for tax breaks for the Governor's CEO buddies was wrong
from the start, and we talked about it all last year.
Our seniors have worked hard to earn their pensions. They shouldn’t have to choose between medications or food
because of this Republican tax hike. This year's been marked by attack after attack on Michigan citizens, asking
them to make great sacrifices while corporations, in fact, reap the benefits. Let's go home with a clear conscience,
knowing that we did something to help, rather than to harm, our elder population. If tax breaks are good for
business, then they must be good for seniors as well. Here's your chance to support lower taxes by supporting my
amendment.

Line

3) Re: 2011 Senate Bill 409 (Revise income tax on pensions detail )  by OldVet2 on June 27, 2011 

 All  you have to do is look back at gypsy's posts and you will see he is a brainwashed union man that has never ran a business.He also admits he is a socialist, and everything he says proves the point. He will soon attack you by resorting to name calling and insults to your intelligence. He has said that he managed a business so he knew what it was like to own one. He is easily discredited and made a fool, but doesn't realize it.


Line

View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.