Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2011 House Bill 4627: Ban laying off more effective but less senior teachers first (“LIFO”) (House Roll Call 296)
facebook  twitter 

Passed 64 to 44 in the House on June 30, 2011, to concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill, which among other things, stripped out a provision allowing a principal to refuse to accept an assigned "ineffective" teacher, and which potentially waters-down the extent to which effectiveness ratings are based on "student acheivement".
View All of House Bill 4627: History, Amendments & Comments 

The vote was 64 in favor, 44 against, and 2 not voting.
(House Roll Call 296)

Print-friendly version

 Comment on this vote   View others' comments   Add to scorecard 

Line

Vote
In Favor In Favor
Against Against
Not Voting Not Voting
 Undecided
Republican
95595%
1991%
3973%
63 total votes
Democrat
8928%
91991%
1000%
47 total votes

What do you think? In Favor Against Undecided (log on required)

Line

Ban laying off more effective but less senior teachers first (“LIFO”)

IN FAVOR

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

Cavanagh (D)Jackson (D)Melton (D)Stapleton (D)

HOUSE REPUBLICANS

Agema (R)Bolger (R)Bumstead (R)Callton (R)Cotter (R)
Crawford (R)Daley (R)Damrow (R)Denby (R)Farrington (R)
Forlini (R)Foster (R)Franz (R)Genetski (R)Gilbert (R)
Glardon (R)Goike (R)Haines (R)Haveman (R)Heise (R)
Hooker (R)Horn (R)Hughes (R)Huuki (R)Jacobsen (R)
Jenkins (R)Johnson (R)Knollenberg (R)Kurtz (R)LaFontaine (R)
Lori (R)Lund (R)Lyons (R)MacGregor (R)MacMaster (R)
McMillin (R)Moss (R)Muxlow (R)Nesbitt (R)O'Brien (R)
Olson (R)Opsommer (R)Ouimet (R)Outman (R)Pettalia (R)
Poleski (R)Potvin (R)Price (R)Pscholka (R)Rendon (R)
Rogers (R)Schmidt, W. (R)Scott (R)Shirkey (R)Somerville (R)
Stamas (R)Tyler (R)Walsh (R)Yonker (R)Zorn (R)


AGAINST

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

Ananich (D)Barnett (D)Bauer (D)Bledsoe (D)Brown (D)
Brunner (D)Byrum (D)Clemente (D)Constan (D)Darany (D)
Dillon (D)Durhal (D)Geiss (D)Hammel (D)Haugh (D)
Hobbs (D)Hovey-Wright (D)Howze (D)Irwin (D)Kandrevas (D)
Lane (D)LeBlanc (D)Lindberg (D)Lipton (D)Liss (D)
McCann (D)Meadows (D)Nathan (D)Oakes (D)Olumba (D)
Rutledge (D)Santana (D)Schmidt, R. (D)Segal (D)Slavens (D)
Smiley (D)Stallworth (D)Stanley (D)Switalski (D)Talabi (D)
Tlaib (D)Townsend (D)Womack (D)  

HOUSE REPUBLICANS

McBroom (R)


HOUSE LEGISLATORS WHO DID NOT VOTE

Kowall (R)Shaughnessy (R)



HOUSE LEGISLATORS ALL VOTES

Y    Agema (R)  n  Ananich (D)  n  Barnett (D)  n  Bauer (D)  n  Bledsoe (D)
Y    Bolger (R)  n  Brown (D)  n  Brunner (D)Y    Bumstead (R)  n  Byrum (D)
Y    Callton (R)Y    Cavanagh (D)  n  Clemente (D)  n  Constan (D)Y    Cotter (R)
Y    Crawford (R)Y    Daley (R)Y    Damrow (R)  n  Darany (D)Y    Denby (R)
  n  Dillon (D)  n  Durhal (D)Y    Farrington (R)Y    Forlini (R)Y    Foster (R)
Y    Franz (R)  n  Geiss (D)Y    Genetski (R)Y    Gilbert (R)Y    Glardon (R)
Y    Goike (R)Y    Haines (R)  n  Hammel (D)  n  Haugh (D)Y    Haveman (R)
Y    Heise (R)  n  Hobbs (D)Y    Hooker (R)Y    Horn (R)  n  Hovey-Wright (D)
  n  Howze (D)Y    Hughes (R)Y    Huuki (R)  n  Irwin (D)Y    Jackson (D)
Y    Jacobsen (R)Y    Jenkins (R)Y    Johnson (R)  n  Kandrevas (D)Y    Knollenberg (R)
  -  Kowall (R)Y    Kurtz (R)Y    LaFontaine (R)  n  Lane (D)  n  LeBlanc (D)
  n  Lindberg (D)  n  Lipton (D)  n  Liss (D)Y    Lori (R)Y    Lund (R)
Y    Lyons (R)Y    MacGregor (R)Y    MacMaster (R)  n  McBroom (R)  n  McCann (D)
Y    McMillin (R)  n  Meadows (D)Y    Melton (D)Y    Moss (R)Y    Muxlow (R)
  n  Nathan (D)Y    Nesbitt (R)Y    O'Brien (R)  n  Oakes (D)Y    Olson (R)
  n  Olumba (D)Y    Opsommer (R)Y    Ouimet (R)Y    Outman (R)Y    Pettalia (R)
Y    Poleski (R)Y    Potvin (R)Y    Price (R)Y    Pscholka (R)Y    Rendon (R)
Y    Rogers (R)  n  Rutledge (D)  n  Santana (D)  n  Schmidt, R. (D)Y    Schmidt, W. (R)
Y    Scott (R)  n  Segal (D)  -  Shaughnessy (R)Y    Shirkey (R)  n  Slavens (D)
  n  Smiley (D)Y    Somerville (R)  n  Stallworth (D)Y    Stamas (R)  n  Stanley (D)
Y    Stapleton (D)  n  Switalski (D)  n  Talabi (D)  n  Tlaib (D)  n  Townsend (D)
Y    Tyler (R)Y    Walsh (R)  n  Womack (D)Y    Yonker (R)Y    Zorn (R)

House Roll Call 296 on 2011 House Bill 4627

Line

Comments

Re: 2011 House Bill 4627 (Ban laying off more effective but less senior teachers first (“LIFO”) )  by TaterSalad on November 30, 2011 

Another ban that is now being considered:


 


Coming down the pike:


 


This future legislation by the Democrats will be introduced soon and needs to be exposed to the citizens of Michigan:


 



State Sen. Rebekah Warren, D-Ann Arbor, is planning to introduce a constitutional amendment banning for-profit schools in Michigan.


Details of the proposal aren’t yet known, but Warren issued a media advisory today indicating she plans to make the announcement during a news conference at 9:30 a.m. Tuesday in Rooms 402 and 403 of the Michigan State Capitol Building in Lansing.


“In October, Republicans pushed legislation that would remove Michigan’s cap on charter schools, essentially opening the doors to for-profit schools and increased privatization of teachers and school workers,” the advisory states. “This constitutional amendment aims to protect our children’s education from being compromised at the expense of corporate profits”…




Re: 2011 House Bill 4627 (Ban laying off more effective but less senior teachers first (“LIFO”) )  by yoop2u on May 18, 2011 

Bad teachers are not protected by good teachers.  Bad teachers are protected by bad administrators who recommend them for tenure or give them good evaluations in the first place.  Administrators in many schools need to grow a spine and fire the bad teachers in their first few years of working - who cares if that bad teacher is "cousin Tom's step-son" who once taught your kid how to play catch.  Who cares if that "bad teacher" is a pretty good coach.  Stop giving them good evaluations and protecting their job!  Tenure is not the problem because a bad teacher can be fired for ANY reason in their first 5 years.  A really good teacher does not suddenly become a bad teacher just because they have earned tenure - they were that way from the very beginning.



Re: 2011 House Bill 4627 (Ban laying off more effective but less senior teachers first (“LIFO”) )  by changeagent on May 12, 2011 

[quote user="lilstoetz"] would work if teachers were able to select their raw materials, business-style. [/quote]


Seems like the wrong analogy to me.  Students are more analogous to customers than raw materials.  Businesses don't choose their customers.  Some of them are wonderful to work with and easy to please, while others are a pain in the ass but are still customers.  Successful businesses manage to satisfy the majority of their customers.  Certainly the type of students a teacher has to deal with comes into consideration but just because the teacher has some difficult students it should not be an excuse for poor performance. 


Let's face it, there are many good teachers out there and there are certainly some bad ones.  I have children in the public school system and I have seen both.  It still baffles me why any good teachers would want to protect the bad teachers but it happens all the time.  We need to hold teachers accountable for their performance and get rid of poor performers.



View These pre-2013 Comments on the Forum.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.