Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2011 House Bill 4408: Reduce future unemployment benefits (Senate Roll Call 79)
facebook  twitter 

Amendment offered by Sen. John Gleason (D) on March 23, 2011, to increase the amount of additional unemployment benefits paid for each dependent. The amendment failed 12 to 25 in the Senate on March 23, 2011.
View All of House Bill 4408: History, Amendments & Comments 

The vote was 12 in favor, 25 against, and 1 not voting.
(Senate Roll Call 79)

Print-friendly version

 Comment on this vote   View others' comments   Add to scorecard 

Line

Vote
In Favor In Favor
Against Against
Not Voting Not Voting
 Undecided
Democrat
100100%
1000%
1000%
12 total votes
Republican
1000%
96496%
3973%
26 total votes

What do you think? In Favor Against Undecided (log on required)

Line

The amendment

IN FAVOR

SENATE DEMOCRATS

Anderson (D)Bieda (D)Gleason (D)Gregory (D)Hood (D)
Hopgood (D)Hunter (D)Johnson (D)Smith (D)Warren (D)
Whitmer (D)Young (D)   

SENATE REPUBLICANS
none


AGAINST

SENATE DEMOCRATS
none

SENATE REPUBLICANS

Booher (R)Brandenburg (R)Casperson (R)Caswell (R)Colbeck (R)
Emmons (R)Green (R)Hildenbrand (R)Hune (R)Jansen (R)
Jones (R)Kahn (R)Kowall (R)Marleau (R)Meekhof (R)
Moolenaar (R)Nofs (R)Pappageorge (R)Pavlov (R)Proos (R)
Richardville (R)Robertson (R)Rocca (R)Schuitmaker (R)Walker (R)


SENATE LEGISLATORS WHO DID NOT VOTE

Hansen (R)



SENATE LEGISLATORS ALL VOTES

Y    Anderson (D)Y    Bieda (D)  n  Booher (R)  n  Brandenburg (R)  n  Casperson (R)
  n  Caswell (R)  n  Colbeck (R)  n  Emmons (R)Y    Gleason (D)  n  Green (R)
Y    Gregory (D)  -  Hansen (R)  n  Hildenbrand (R)Y    Hood (D)Y    Hopgood (D)
  n  Hune (R)Y    Hunter (D)  n  Jansen (R)Y    Johnson (D)  n  Jones (R)
  n  Kahn (R)  n  Kowall (R)  n  Marleau (R)  n  Meekhof (R)  n  Moolenaar (R)
  n  Nofs (R)  n  Pappageorge (R)  n  Pavlov (R)  n  Proos (R)  n  Richardville (R)
  n  Robertson (R)  n  Rocca (R)  n  Schuitmaker (R)Y    Smith (D)  n  Walker (R)
Y    Warren (D)Y    Whitmer (D)Y    Young (D)  

Senate Roll Call 79 on The amendment

Line

Comments

Re: 2011 House Bill 4408 (Increase unemployment benefit fraud damage penalties )  by cen20474 on April 1, 2011 

You SOB are reallity something. If you wanted to save the state money (All you have to do is go to part time Legislator) and the state would save Million of $$$$$$$$$$$$$ 



Re: 2011 House Bill 4408 (Increase unemployment benefit fraud damage penalties )  by Admin003 on March 23, 2011 


Senator Pappageorge's statement is as follows: 


 I would remind the previous speaker, maybe folks don't understand how this money works. Each individual 


business owner has an account with the feds and the state, and that business owner pays that money to the feds and 


to the state. We all understand that now? So when you suck money out of every one of the businesses in your 


district, don't ask them to be able to hire or keep more people. They can't do it if we keep sucking the money out of 


that business. Hello? Hello? This is not business versus workers. The only people who pay taxes are individuals. But 


we go out of our way--and have for years--to figure out how to have business collect the money for us. That's what 


is going on. 


 Every one of your businesses--let me say it again--every one of the businesses in your district are paying this bill. 


They need relief. The idea of some magic, federal money comes into the system, and therefore, allows people to buy 


things and businesses prosper is really misguided.  


 This bill extends benefits for 20 weeks. At the same time, it gives relief. Let me say that again: It gives relief to 


every business in your district, and if you're telling me the businesses in your district don't need that relief, I would 


say check again with your businesses. 




Re: 2011 House Bill 4408 (Increase unemployment benefit fraud damage penalties )  by Admin003 on March 23, 2011 


Senator Caswell's statement is as follows: 


 Small businesses are job creators, and over 80 percent of our jobs come from them. I ran into an individual who 


owns a factory in my district when I was campaigning. He spent over half of his personal fortune to keep his factory 


open and going. His comment to me was, "Bruce, these people I have working out here are my friends and 


neighbors, and I am going to do everything I can to make sure they continue to have a job." I have compassion for 


that kind of individual who is living the American Dream and doing everything he can in order to keep his people 


employed. 


 I ran into numerous, numerous small business owners who had spent their entire 401(k)s that was their retirement 


in order to keep their business open through the dark days to keep their friends and neighbors employed. They have 


nothing left for retirement. I have compassion for those people who have worked hard every day of their life and 


sacrificed everything when times got tough to keep their friends and neighbors employed. 


 I ran into a flower shop in one of my cities. I walked in and it was 60 degrees in that flower shop. They did not 


have money for heat. They were $3,000 behind in their rent, and the individual who owned the building said, "I will 


let you stay there as long as you keep people employed." And she did. I have compassion for those people who have 


done everything in their power to keep their businesses going and to keep people employed. The stories go on and 


on and on. Small businesses--the job creators--are our friends and neighbors. They employee our friends and 


neighbors. We have to understand that when they live the American Dream, we all live the American Dream. Hard 


work should be rewarded, and success should be rewarded. Each of us should praise those who create jobs and make 


the kind of sacrifices that I just mentioned to keep their friends and neighbors employed. I salute them.  


 Yes, there are a lot of things wrong with unemployment. I will tell you of one. One is that if you are a private 


business owner of a certain kind of business and you shut it down, even though you are required to pay 


unemployment on yourself--full unemployment--you get seven weeks of unemployment and that is it. Oh, you can 


also get a five-week extension, but you are expected to pay fully into the unemployment insurance fund. I have 


compassion for those people who have paid the full bill and can benefit very little from the unemployment insurance 


system. 


 God bless our small business owners, and may we make Michigan a state that you are proud to be in; that we 


welcome success, and we champion those who employ our friends and neighbors.




View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.