

2010 Senate Bill 1174: Rewrite corporate takeover rules for particular insurance company (Senate Roll Call 136)
Passed 27 to 10 in the Senate on March 23, 2010.
View All of Senate Bill 1174: History, Amendments & Comments
The vote was 27 in favor, 10 against, and 1 not voting.
(Senate Roll Call 136)
Comment on this vote View others' comments Add to scorecard
![]()
|
|
|
|
![]()
Rewrite corporate takeover rules for particular insurance company
IN FAVOR
SENATE DEMOCRATS
| Anderson (D) | Barcia (D) | Basham (D) | Cherry (D) | Clark-Coleman (D) |
| Clarke (D) | Gleason (D) | Hunter (D) | Olshove (D) | Prusi (D) |
| Scott (D) | Whitmer (D) |
SENATE REPUBLICANS
| Allen (R) | Birkholz (R) | Bishop (R) | Brown (R) | Cassis (R) |
| Cropsey (R) | George (R) | Gilbert (R) | Jelinek (R) | Kahn (R) |
| Kuipers (R) | McManus (R) | Patterson (R) | Richardville (R) | Van Woerkom (R) |
AGAINST
SENATE DEMOCRATS
| Brater (D) | Jacobs (D) | Switalski (D) | Thomas (D) |
SENATE REPUBLICANS
| Hardiman (R) | Jansen (R) | Nofs (R) | Pappageorge (R) | Sanborn (R) |
| Stamas (R) |
SENATE LEGISLATORS WHO DID NOT VOTE
| Garcia (R) |
SENATE LEGISLATORS ALL VOTES
Senate Roll Call 136 on 2010 Senate Bill 1174
![]()
c
Senator Jacobs, under her constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against the passage of Senate Bill No. 1174 and moved that the statement she made during the discussion of the bill be printed as her reasons for voting "no." The motion prevailed.