Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2009 Senate Concurrent Resolution 4: Send note to Congress requesting it honor 10th Amendment (Senate Roll Call 460)
facebook  twitter 

Passed 33 to 0 in the Senate on September 17, 2009, to send a note to Congress stating that the Michigan Senate and House think they should honor Michigan's sovereignty under the 10th Amendment over all powers not enumerated and granted to the federal government. The measure has no force of law, and requires no further actions on this issue by the legislature.
View All of Senate Concurrent Resolution 4: History, Amendments & Comments 

The vote was 33 in favor, 0 against, and 4 not voting.
(Senate Roll Call 460)

Print-friendly version

 Comment on this vote   View others' comments   Add to scorecard 

Line

Vote
In Favor In Favor
Against Against
Not Voting Not Voting
 Undecided
Republican
901090%
1000%
9919%
21 total votes
Democrat
871387%
1000%
128812%
16 total votes
Voters
100100%
1000%
1000%
2 total votes

What do you think? In Favor Against Undecided (log on required)

Line

Send note to Congress requesting it honor 10th Amendment

IN FAVOR

SENATE DEMOCRATS

Anderson (D)Barcia (D)Basham (D)Brater (D)Cherry (D)
Clark-Coleman (D)Clarke (D)Hunter (D)Jacobs (D)Olshove (D)
Prusi (D)Scott (D)Switalski (D)Whitmer (D) 

SENATE REPUBLICANS

Allen (R)Birkholz (R)Bishop (R)Brown (R)Cassis (R)
Cropsey (R)George (R)Gilbert (R)Hardiman (R)Jansen (R)
Kahn (R)Kuipers (R)McManus (R)Pappageorge (R)Patterson (R)
Richardville (R)Sanborn (R)Stamas (R)Van Woerkom (R) 


AGAINST

SENATE DEMOCRATS
none

SENATE REPUBLICANS
none


SENATE LEGISLATORS WHO DID NOT VOTE

Garcia (R)Gleason (D)Jelinek (R)Thomas (D)



SENATE LEGISLATORS ALL VOTES

Y    Allen (R)Y    Anderson (D)Y    Barcia (D)Y    Basham (D)Y    Birkholz (R)
Y    Bishop (R)Y    Brater (D)Y    Brown (R)Y    Cassis (R)Y    Cherry (D)
Y    Clark-Coleman (D)Y    Clarke (D)Y    Cropsey (R)  -  Garcia (R)Y    George (R)
Y    Gilbert (R)  -  Gleason (D)Y    Hardiman (R)Y    Hunter (D)Y    Jacobs (D)
Y    Jansen (R)  -  Jelinek (R)Y    Kahn (R)Y    Kuipers (R)Y    McManus (R)
Y    Olshove (D)Y    Pappageorge (R)Y    Patterson (R)Y    Prusi (D)Y    Richardville (R)
Y    Sanborn (R)Y    Scott (D)Y    Stamas (R)Y    Switalski (D)  -  Thomas (D)
Y    Van Woerkom (R)Y    Whitmer (D)   

Senate Roll Call 460 on 2009 Senate Concurrent Resolution 4

Line

Comments

Re: 2009 Senate Concurrent Resolution 4  by LibertyPaine on August 21, 2009 

Hooray! One more step toward reclaiming our liberty!



Re: 2009 Senate Concurrent Resolution 4  by beverlytran on March 7, 2009 

Bravo!



Re: 2009 Senate Concurrent Resolution 4  by Dktubbs on March 5, 2009 

 Yes, this bill should pass.  The federal government continues to burden the states with unfunded mandates while encroaching on the rights of citizens.  Something must be done to stop the feds.



View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.