Senate Roll Call 725 - Michigan Votes

Legislation watch

2005 Senate Bill 162 (Authorize “redevelopment project area liquor licenses” ) (Senate Roll Call 725)

Passed in the Senate (36 to 0) on November 14, 2006. [History, Amendments & Comments]

The vote was 36 in favor, 0 opposed, and 2 not voting
(Senate Roll Call 725 at Senate Journal 87)

[Comment on this vote | View others' comments]

Line

Vote

Support

Oppose

Not Voting

Undecided

Legislators (Republican)

	95%
	0%
	4%

22 total votes

Legislators (Democrat)

	93%
	0%
	6%

16 total votes

Voters

	100%
	0%
	0%

1 total vote

Line

The following legislators supported 2005 Senate Bill 162 (Authorize “redevelopment project area liquor licenses” ):

Allen (R)	Barcia (D)	Basham (D)	Birkholz (R)	Bishop (R)	Brater (D)
Brown (R)	Cassis (R)	Cherry (D)	Clark-Coleman (D)	Clarke (D)	Cropsey (R)
Emerson (D)	Garcia (R)	George (R)	Gilbert (R)	Goschka (R)	Hammerstrom (R)
Hardiman (R)	Jacobs (D)	Jelinek (R)	Johnson (R)	Kuipers (R)	McManus (R)
Olshove (D)	Prusi (D)	Sanborn (R)	Schauer (D)	Scott (D)	Sikkema (R)
Stamas (R)	Switalski (D)	Thomas (D)	Toy (R)	Van Woerkom (R)	Whitmer (D)

The following legislators opposed 2005 Senate Bill 162 (Authorize “redevelopment project area liquor licenses” ):

The following legislators did not vote on 2005 Senate Bill 162 (Authorize “redevelopment project area liquor licenses” ):

Leland (D)

Patterson (R)

Line

Most Recent Comments

Add Comment

1) Drink up, I say! [by Anonymous Citizen on November 11, 2006]
lol

Reply

Line

2) every time somebody says [by Anonymous Citizen on November 11, 2006]
"gimme a beer" the state makes money.

i would think that the state would (since they are in the business of making money off of the sale of alcohol) would be promoting that business as hard as they could.

Reply

Line

3) Pay back the Beer and Wine Lobby!?!?! [by Anonymous Citizen on November 10, 2006]
Hello, Pottersville.
Reply

Line

View Full Conversation