Legislation watch
2003 Senate Bill 823 (Revise the number of judges) (Senate Roll Call 907)
Passed in the Senate (35 to 0) on December 8, 2004. [History, Amendments & Comments]
The vote was 35 in favor, 0 opposed, and 3 not voting
(Senate Roll Call 907 at Senate Journal 107)
[Comment on this vote | View others' comments]
|
|
|
Support
Oppose
Not Voting
Undecided
The following legislators supported 2003 Senate Bill 823 (Revise the number of judges):
The following legislators opposed 2003 Senate Bill 823 (Revise the number of judges):
The following legislators did not vote on 2003 Senate Bill 823 (Revise the number of judges):
| George (R) | Olshove (D) | Toy (R) |
Most Recent Comments
1) Audit is necessary. [by Anonymous Citizen on November 5, 2003]Mega costs the tax payers mega dollars and should be accountable regarding delivering on its promises. An audit is necessary to assure that the taxpayers are not throwing their dollars to the wind. Please support this bill.
Reply
Introduced in the Senate on November 4, 2003, to convert part-time probate judges in Alcona, Baraga, Benzie, Iron, Missaukee, Montmorency, Ontonagon, Oscoda, and Presque Isle Counties to full-time status; and give the jurisdiction and authority of a district judge to these judges and to the probate judges in Barry, Berrien, Isabella, Otsego, and Van Buren counties. Also, to provide that the state would pay the full cost of ballot questions on creating probate districts, rather than half the cost
The vote was 37 in favor, 0 opposed and 1 not voting
(Senate Roll Call 833 at Senate Journal 105)
Click here to view bill details.
Reply
View Full Conversation
