Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2003 House Bill 5233: Require licensure of massage therapists (House Roll Call 948)
facebook  twitter 

Passed 60 to 43 in the House on November 30, 2004, to require licensure and regulation of massage therapists, and impose $75 annual license fees. The bill would create a Michigan Board of Massage Therapy to establish licensure and competence assessment requirements for the practice of massage therapy, and would require 500 hours of training.
View All of House Bill 5233: History, Amendments & Comments 

The vote was 60 in favor, 43 against, and 7 not voting.
(House Roll Call 948 at House Journal 87)

Print-friendly version

 Comment on this vote   View others' comments   Add to scorecard 

Line

Vote
In Favor In Favor
Against Against
Not Voting Not Voting
 Undecided
Democrat
613961%
277327%
109010%
47 total votes
Republican
495149%
475347%
3973%
63 total votes
Voters
1000%
100100%
1000%
1 total vote

What do you think? In Favor Against Undecided (log on required)

Line

Require licensure of massage therapists

IN FAVOR

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

Accavitti (D)Bieda (D)Brown (D)Cheeks (D)Daniels (D)
Dennis (D)Farrah (D)Gieleghem (D)Gillard (D)Gleason (D)
Hardman (D)Hopgood (D)Hunter (D)Jamnick (D)Kolb (D)
Law (D)Meisner (D)Murphy (D)O'Neil (D)Plakas (D)
Reeves (D)Rivet (D)Sak (D)Spade (D)Stallworth (D)
Vagnozzi (D)Whitmer (D)Wojno (D)Woodward (D) 

HOUSE REPUBLICANS

Amos (R)Caswell (R)Caul (R)DeRossett (R)Ehardt (R)
Gaffney (R)Hager (R)Howell (R)Huizenga (R)Johnson, Rick (R)
Julian (R)Koetje (R)Kooiman (R)Meyer (R)Mortimer (R)
Newell (R)Nitz (R)Pappageorge (R)Pastor (R)Richardville (R)
Robertson (R)Shulman (R)Stakoe (R)Steil (R)Stewart (R)
Tabor (R)Van Regenmorter (R)VanderVeen (R)Ward (R)Wenke (R)
Woronchak (R)    


AGAINST

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

Adamini (D)Anderson (D)Byrum (D)Clack (D)Condino (D)
Dillon (D)Elkins (D)Hood (D)Lipsey (D)Sheltrown (D)
Smith (D)Tobocman (D)Waters (D)  

HOUSE REPUBLICANS

Acciavatti (R)Bisbee (R)Bradstreet (R)Brandenburg (R)Casperson (R)
DeRoche (R)Drolet (R)Emmons (R)Farhat (R)Garfield (R)
Hoogendyk (R)Hummel (R)Hune (R)Johnson, Ruth (R)LaJoy (R)
LaSata (R)Middaugh (R)Milosch (R)Moolenaar (R)Nofs (R)
Palmer (R)Palsrok (R)Pumford (R)Rocca (R)Shaffer (R)
Sheen (R)Stahl (R)Taub (R)Voorhees (R)Walker (R)


HOUSE LEGISLATORS WHO DID NOT VOTE

Hart (R)McConico (D)Minore (D)Phillips (D)Shackleton (R)
Williams (D)Zelenko (D)   



HOUSE LEGISLATORS ALL VOTES

Y    Accavitti (D)  n  Acciavatti (R)  n  Adamini (D)Y    Amos (R)  n  Anderson (D)
Y    Bieda (D)  n  Bisbee (R)  n  Bradstreet (R)  n  Brandenburg (R)Y    Brown (D)
  n  Byrum (D)  n  Casperson (R)Y    Caswell (R)Y    Caul (R)Y    Cheeks (D)
  n  Clack (D)  n  Condino (D)Y    Daniels (D)Y    Dennis (D)  n  DeRoche (R)
Y    DeRossett (R)  n  Dillon (D)  n  Drolet (R)Y    Ehardt (R)  n  Elkins (D)
  n  Emmons (R)  n  Farhat (R)Y    Farrah (D)Y    Gaffney (R)  n  Garfield (R)
Y    Gieleghem (D)Y    Gillard (D)Y    Gleason (D)Y    Hager (R)Y    Hardman (D)
  -  Hart (R)  n  Hood (D)  n  Hoogendyk (R)Y    Hopgood (D)Y    Howell (R)
Y    Huizenga (R)  n  Hummel (R)  n  Hune (R)Y    Hunter (D)Y    Jamnick (D)
Y    Johnson, Rick (R)  n  Johnson, Ruth (R)Y    Julian (R)Y    Koetje (R)Y    Kolb (D)
Y    Kooiman (R)  n  LaJoy (R)  n  LaSata (R)Y    Law (D)  n  Lipsey (D)
  -  McConico (D)Y    Meisner (D)Y    Meyer (R)  n  Middaugh (R)  n  Milosch (R)
  -  Minore (D)  n  Moolenaar (R)Y    Mortimer (R)Y    Murphy (D)Y    Newell (R)
Y    Nitz (R)  n  Nofs (R)Y    O'Neil (D)  n  Palmer (R)  n  Palsrok (R)
Y    Pappageorge (R)Y    Pastor (R)  -  Phillips (D)Y    Plakas (D)  n  Pumford (R)
Y    Reeves (D)Y    Richardville (R)Y    Rivet (D)Y    Robertson (R)  n  Rocca (R)
Y    Sak (D)  -  Shackleton (R)  n  Shaffer (R)  n  Sheen (R)  n  Sheltrown (D)
Y    Shulman (R)  n  Smith (D)Y    Spade (D)  n  Stahl (R)Y    Stakoe (R)
Y    Stallworth (D)Y    Steil (R)Y    Stewart (R)Y    Tabor (R)  n  Taub (R)
  n  Tobocman (D)Y    Vagnozzi (D)Y    Van Regenmorter (R)Y    VanderVeen (R)  n  Voorhees (R)
  n  Walker (R)Y    Ward (R)  n  Waters (D)Y    Wenke (R)Y    Whitmer (D)
  -  Williams (D)Y    Wojno (D)Y    Woodward (D)Y    Woronchak (R)  -  Zelenko (D)

House Roll Call 948 on 2003 House Bill 5233

Line

Comments

1) Massagers want a protection racket  by Anonymous Citizen on September 6, 2005 
In a perfect world you would be correct, Mike Hignite, but in this case you're on the wrong track. Like every other profession that comes running to Lansing seeking licensure in order to "protect the public" from "unscrupulous and incompetent practitioners," the real game here is to raise barriers to the entry of potential competititors, and thereby existing the existing "good old boy and girl" network to squeeze oligopoly profits out of consumers. Search this site for the word "licensure" to see a roundup of all the special interests that want to join the "protection racket state." (That is a term coined by ecomomics professor Stephen Dresch, comparing legislatures to mob rackets in their propensity to create new things to be "afraid of," and then provide "solutions" in the form of new laws and bigger government.)

Line

2) State Licensing  by Mike Hignite on August 29, 2005 
If you are a certified massage therapist, advertise it. Have your professional association market and police it privately. If you have something to offer and the public recognizes it, great. You don't want the state to get into licensing your profession. It increases the fees, restricts trade, and does nothing to insure that anything would change in public perception of your occupation.

Your problem has no governmentally sanctioned solutions.

Line

3) Professional Massage Practicioners and Therapist  by Anonymous Citizen on August 28, 2005 
I am a Certified Massage Therapist with training which meets or exceeds the NBTMBW. I find it imperative that the state of Michigan set standards for our professionals.

As much as I dislike big brother and legal regulations, I find this matter essential. I am tired of my profession being linked with cat houses or the entertainment field. I no longer want to read another bill or law in which massage is placed under the entertainment field.

This law would allow Massage to receive the respect of our local communities, health care systems, and the public as a whole. We should no longer be forced to take screenings for sexual communicable diseases in order to prove ourselves professional and able to practice.

As well, we need the same respect as Physical Theraist, Nurses, Hair Dressers, etc. It makes it much more difficult to set the standards when there are so many massage clinics practicing with out any education or certification.

I worked hard to get my certification and take my profession serious. This is not to say that there are massage therapist who have been practicing legitimatly in the communities with out certification, however there is still those clients out there which can not separate the difference between a cat house and a legitimate profession. Because prostitutes continually try to hide behind our profession, all legitimate massage therapist need to stand up and say, "Not in Our Profession!" If that means that those without certification need to get certified, then so be it.

As Therapist, we are able and equipt to provide that which most professions can not. We bridge the gap between Eastern and Western Health Modalities, and foster the holistic link which has been adopted by most hospitals. The research is in on Massage and it's therapeutic benefits from pregnancy to the elderly. There is no better time than today in massage, wither you are the provider or the receipient.

Line

View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.