Legislation watch
2004 Senate Bill 1023 (Contract out sustainable forestry pilot projects) (Senate Roll Call 281)
Passed in the Senate (23 to 15) on May 13, 2004. [History, Amendments & Comments]
The vote was 23 in favor, 15 opposed, and 0 not voting
(Senate Roll Call 281 at Senate Journal 47)
[Comment on this vote | View others' comments]
|
|
|
|
Support
Oppose
Not Voting
Undecided
The following legislators supported 2004 Senate Bill 1023 (Contract out sustainable forestry pilot projects):
The following legislators opposed 2004 Senate Bill 1023 (Contract out sustainable forestry pilot projects):
| Basham (D) | Bernero (D) | Brater (D) | Cherry (D) | Clark-Coleman (D) | Clarke (D) |
| Emerson (D) | Jacobs (D) | Johnson (R) | Leland (D) | Olshove (D) | Patterson (R) |
| Schauer (D) | Scott (D) | Thomas (D) |
The following legislators did not vote on 2004 Senate Bill 1023 (Contract out sustainable forestry pilot projects):
Most Recent Comments
1) Sen. Clarke's "journal statement" [by Admin003 on May 7, 2004]Senator Clarke, under his constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against passage of Senate Bill No. 1023.
Senator Clarke's statement is as follows:
These bills aren't necessary. They add an unnecessary level of bureaucracy. We currently have in the DNR expert foresters who have good judgment on how to best manage our forest resources. So this is why I voted against this bill and will not be supporting the successive two bills as a part of this package.
Reply
Introduced in the Senate on February 26, 2004, to require the Department of Natural Resources to contract out the management of four forest pilot project areas to be managed on scientific silvicultural specifications based on sustainable forestry principles. The bill is part of a legislative package including House Bill 5554, which would require state forest management to be based on sustainable forestry principles, and requires the state to seek forest certification from an independent third party organization
The vote was 24 in favor, 14 opposed and 0 not voting
(Senate Roll Call 263 at Senate Journal 44)
Click here to view bill details.
Reply
View Full Conversation
