Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 Senate Bill 94: "Michigan Business Tax" SBT replacement package

Public Act 36 of 2007

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Comments

1) Re: 2007 Senate Bill 94 ("Michigan Business Tax" SBT replacement package )  by victor88 on September 27, 2012 
There is definitely so much that is involved with this. You really need to do your homework on this and it will pay off here. I hope this really happens for the future here. discount marine produc

Line

2) Tax calculation question  by Anonymous Citizen on July 16, 2007 
Section 503 states that a fiscal year ending before 12/31/2008 should use a prorated or actual basis. If my tax year is 6/1/2007 - 5/31/2008, then I know how to calculate 1/1/2008-5/31/2008 (as laid out in the new law), but how do I calculate the 2007 period from 6/1/2007 to 12/31/2007? I've been searching the 2007 SBT filing requirements, but so far, no luck. Can anyone shed some light on this situation?

Line

3) Master Plumber Flushed  by Mike Hignite on July 9, 2007 
I wonder if Mr. Steffler lost his job due to the tax burden on his company. The minimum wage increase you passed may have made it harder to employee people. The licensing requirements for plumbers are small, but every little chomp at Mr. Steffler hurts.

I'm sure Mr. Steffler tried valiantly to work on his own servicing selected friends. Too bad that the registration fees, licensing fees, self-employment tax, property tax, and building permits were too onerous to let him prosper at self-employment.

Pretty sad that there is more job opportunites in a war-torn, lawless country than in Michigan.

"I've always had certain principles that I carried with me." I'm sorry that you couldn't see your way clear to keeping them. There is no business tax that is pro-job creation and pro-economic growth.

"Small business is the backbone of our economy." How many licensing requirements have you proposed eliminating? You haven't reduced the net tax on business by one dollar. Minimum wage laws hurt small businesses especially hard.

"One of the hardest was to let go of a stimulative overall tax cut" So why did you?

"I always tried my best to uphold the bedrock of cherished principles that I believe elected me to this noble office: supporting a healthy, vibrant, and efficient economy; and to do so, remembering to leave more of our taxpayers hard-earned dollars in their pockets to use as they see fit, and as we have seen, their money spent will plow back into the economy, and after all, it's their money." I agree. It is Mr. Steffler's money. So why didn't you let him keep more of it?

To quote Chariots of Fire, "Compromise is the language of the Devil." You could have not passed a business tax. You could have made serious cuts to the bloated state spending budget. You could have kept to your principles. What would have happened? Who knows? Maybe we would have had chaos. Maybe the governor would have passed a greatly reduced state budget, allowing for no business taxes at all. That would attracted job-creating businesses. I guess we will never know.

We should be electing representatives of principles. Ones who do not waiver. Someone like Ron Paul of Texas. I wish we had state and federal legislatures full of Ron Paul clones. Then maybe we'd have more of Nancy's principles actually followed.


Line

View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.