Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2005 House Bill 4042 (Eliminate fingerprint requirement for CCW renewal )

Public Act 456 of 2006

[Comments on this legislation] [Post new comment] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

Most Recent Comments

1) CPL Renewal [by NSutliff on September 23, 2006]
The bill's text states in part,"... that only eliminates the license renewal fingerprint requirement IF the state police establish a fingerprint database and an individual's prints are in it."
What do you mean IF? Is this an option with the MSP? Are you saying they DON'T have to establish a database? And IF they don't, then this whole bill is for naught?! We need better language here to clarify this. As well as a time frame to establish and implement this bill.
Reply

Line

2) CPL Renewal [by NSutliff on September 22, 2006]
So what exactly does this mean? That, at present, there is no setup by the MSP for these files? Suppose they don't set one up? Suppose they drag their feet in getting this setup? Is there a time line that they have to have this completed by? Does this mean that our fingerprints are now going to be a permanent record of the MSP just like they are with the FBI? Why was this even a stipulation in getting our CPL renewed? By renewing, it is already known that we have been fingerprinted before and they were cleared! I think this is just another way for our legislators to sidestep this issue. When are they going to have the brass to stand up for our rights? There IS a 2nd Amendment! They should read it!!!
Reply

Line

3) Whatever [by Anonymous Citizen on June 3, 2006]
You're so good with women
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation