Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2003 Senate Bill 770

Public Act 211 of 2003

[Comments on this legislation] [Post new comment] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

Most Recent Comments

1) 1099 State Forms [by Mike Hignite on February 13, 2004]
Another idiotic law! I quote from the analysis section:
"The House Fiscal Agency says that the bill would have minimal state and local fiscal impact, noting that the Department of Treasury currently has provisions in place to identify income not reported as the state level but reported at the federal level to the Internal Revenue Service. (HFA analysis dated 10-28-03)"

The Feds already track and verify this "missed" income. Treasury gets this information from the Feds under a matching program. What is the point of requiring businesses to print another copy of the 1099-MISC for the state, and maybe another for cities?

Here are the good reasons for having this law:
1. Jobs increase by adding more accountants to prepare this useless information.
2. More jobs for lumberjacks to cut down trees to make the paper required for this useless information.
3. Increase state revenue from businesses that haven't heard of the new law and get hit with $50 per form penalties.

Do all of us a favor and repeal this stinker.
Reply

Line

2) Attaching Form 1099 to state return [by Anonymous Citizen on October 20, 2003]
Due to the new regulations from the MI Treasury Department, starting January 1, 2004, any tax preparer who prepares over 200 returns is required to e-file any state return. How is the tax preparer going to attach a form 1099 to an e-filed return?
Reply

Line

3) 2003 Senate Bill 770 [by admin on January 1, 2001]
Introduced in the Senate on October 9, 2003, to require businesses, including independent contractors, to file a copy of their federal 1099 income tax forms with their state income tax returns. These forms (specifically, the 1099 MISC), are prepared to indicate business payments to nonemployees such as subcontractors. The bill would also require a person covered by the bill to file 1099 forms with the city reported as a payee’s address on a 1099 form, if the city imposes a city income tax

The vote was 34 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 not voting

(Senate Roll Call 505 at Senate Journal 89)

Click here to view bill details.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation