Introduced by Sen. Mike Kowall (R) on May 15, 2012, to increase from $3 billion to $4.2 billion the amount of debt he Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA) may incur in performing its role of providing taxpayer-backed mortgage loan guarantees, subsidies and more.
Referred to the Senate Economic Development Committee on May 15, 2012.
Reported in the Senate on May 31, 2012, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Referred to the House Commerce Committee on June 7, 2012.
Reported in the House on September 19, 2012, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on September 19, 2012. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on September 19, 2012.
Amendment offered by Rep. Tom McMillin (R) on September 19, 2012, to tie-bar the bill to House Bills 5648 and 5649, meaning this bill cannot become law unless those do also. Those bills would restrict MSHDA from subsidizing non-housing development projects, and require it follow certain conflict of interest standards. The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on September 19, 2012.
Passed 85 to 20 in the House on September 19, 2012, to increase from $3 billion to $4.2 billion the amount of debt he Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA) may incur in performing its role of providing taxpayer-backed mortgage loan guarantees, subsidies and more. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on September 20, 2012.
Passed 33 to 5 in the Senate on September 25, 2012, to concur with the House-passed version of the bill. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Signed by Gov. Rick Snyder on October 9, 2012.
Comments
1) Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1125 by iuliancezar on November 21, 2012 As one of the overhead garage storage designers i must say that more government housing is one of the best requests that people can make these days. I think that we must demand what we need now not what we need in the future. The economy is how it is but there are a few problems that can be solved with a little patience.
2) Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1125 by molly16 on October 8, 2012 When it comes to funds allocated for the housing department then I am perfectly OK with that but when it comes to increasing debt for housing I am not a fan of that. Why debt is seen as a solution to everything when it clearly isn't? I hope I won't have to include it in my plans, I set my eyes on a house I found on http://www.austintenantadvisors.com/Â and I am looking for alternatives to get it.
3) Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1125 by isabelleelise on May 16, 2012
The state should not be in the housing market. Nor should tge state be picking winners and losers.