Introduced by Rep. Marilyn Lane (D) on May 3, 2012, to establish a statutory 180 day time period on a court order garnishing a person’s wages or salary to satisfy a court judgment.
Referred to the House Judiciary Committee on May 3, 2012.
Reported in the House on May 24, 2012, with the recommendation that the bill be referred to the Committee on Local, Intergovernmental, and Regional Affairs.
Referred to the House Local, Intergovernmental, and Regional Affairs Committee on May 24, 2012.
Reported in the House on May 31, 2012, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on June 7, 2012. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on June 7, 2012.
Passed 107 to 0 in the House on June 7, 2012, to establish a statutory 182 day time period on a court order garnishing a person’s wages or salary to satisfy a court judgment. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on June 12, 2012.
Referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee on June 12, 2012.
Reported in the Senate on August 15, 2012, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed 38 to 0 in the Senate on September 12, 2012, to establish a statutory 182 day time period on a court order garnishing a person’s wages or salary to satisfy a court judgment. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"