Introduced by Sen. Arlan Meekhof (R) on February 29, 2012, to clarify that mortgage loan contracts that contain “non-recourse loan provisions” cannot be made into a recourse loan by a “post closing solvency covenant" or other device. Practically all residential mortgages are “non-recourse” loans, meaning that although the lender can take back the home, he can’t go after (“have recourse to”) a delinquent borrower’s other property or income.
Referred to the Senate Economic Development Committee on February 29, 2012.
Reported in the Senate on March 1, 2012, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Amendment offered in the Senate on March 6, 2012, to clarify that the bill provisions affect existing "non-recourse" loans as well as future ones, and make other technical changes. The amendment passed by voice vote in the Senate on March 6, 2012.
Referred to the House Commerce Committee on March 7, 2012.
Reported in the House on March 13, 2012, without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed 97 to 12 in the House on March 20, 2012, to clarify that mortgage loan contracts that contain “non-recourse loan provisions” cannot be made into a recourse loan by a “post closing solvency covenant" or other device. Practically all residential mortgages are “non-recourse” loans, meaning that although the lender can take back the home, he can’t go after (“have recourse to”) a delinquent borrower’s other property or income. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Signed by Gov. Rick Snyder on March 29, 2012.
Comments
1) 2012 Senate Bill 992 (Clarify mortgage loan contract “non-recourse” provision rules ) by admin on July 7, 2012 Introduced in the Senate on February 29, 2012, to clarify that mortgage loan contracts that contain “non-recourse loan provisions” cannot be made into a recourse loan by a “post closing solvency covenant" or other device. Practically all residential mortgages are “non-recourse” loans, meaning that although the lender can take back the home, he can’t go after (“have recourse to”) a delinquent borrower’s other property or income
The vote was 33 in favor, 5 opposed and 0 not voting