Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2011 House Bill 4936: Allow less than unlimited PIP insurance

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Comments

1) Re: 2011 House Bill 4936 (Allow less than unlimited PIP insurance )  by victor88 on September 15, 2012 
I do not see being able to drop this coverage down is not good at all. This coverage is so important to car insurance. This would not be good to pass at all here. L'Académie Westboro

Line

2) Re: 2011 House Bill 4936 (Allow less than unlimited PIP insurance )  by Freerider on March 22, 2012 

 Michigan is the ONLY state that has this. And (not coincidentally) we also have the highest rates in the nation! And (also not coincidentally) one of the highest uninsured drivers rates in the nation. 20% of Michigan drivers are uninsured, 40% in Detroit! Whatever the other 49 states are doing seems to be working. Although I think a good compromise would be to allow the option of having or not having unlimited coverage. I have to admit that having unlimited coverage is nice to have if you need it, but I still favor having the FREEDOM to decide for yourself what's best for you. That's the beauty of the free market and living in a free country!


Line

3) Re: 2011 House Bill 4936 (Allow less than unlimited PIP insurance )  by crisscross on March 22, 2012 
Indeed, why should people pay for mandatory catastrophic coverage when most of what people change in their cars on an ordinary basis are the headlights. I mean for those car owners who don`t cause incidents or keep away from being involved in incidents. Indeed, insurance regulations are too hard on drivers in Michigan. We can only hope one day the state will decide to take the example of the other states that got convinced of the financial strain they are putting on citizens.

Line

View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.