state laws at your finger tips
in concise, plain language
Legislation watch

2010 Senate Concurrent Resolution 35: Reject 3 percent state employee pay hike
Introduced by Sen. Ron Jelinek (R) on March 3, 2010 To reject a 3 percent pay increase for unionized state government employees for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1, 2010. Reportedly the raise will cost $77.3 million. A two-thirds majority is required to pass the measure.   Official Text and Analysis.
Failed 22 to 15 in the Senate on March 3, 2010 (same description)
To reject a 3 percent state government employee pay increase for the 2010-2011 fiscal year (which begins on Oct. 1, 2010). Reportedly the raise will cost $77.3 million. A two-thirds majority is required in both the House and Senate to pass the measure, and the House leadership refused to bring it up for a vote.
Received in the Senate on March 17, 2010 To reject a 3 percent state government employee pay increase for the 2010-2011 fiscal year (which begins on Oct. 1, 2010). Reportedly the raise will cost $77.3 million. A two-thirds majority is required in both the House and Senate to pass the measure, and the House leadership refused to bring it up for a vote.
Failed 23 to 15 in the Senate on March 17, 2010
Moved to reconsider by Sen. Alan L. Cropsey (R) on March 17, 2010 The vote by which the concurrent resolution was not adopted.
The motion failed by voice vote in the Senate on March 17, 2010
Received in the Senate on March 25, 2010 To reject a 3 percent state government employee pay increase for the 2010-2011 fiscal year (which begins on Oct. 1, 2010). Reportedly the raise will cost $77.3 million. A two-thirds majority is required in both the House and Senate to pass the measure, and the House leadership refused to bring it up for a vote.
Failed 23 to 15 in the Senate on March 25, 2010

Comments