Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2009 Senate Bill 295: Require citizenship/resident preferences in certain programs

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Re: 2009 Senate Bill 295 (Require citizenship/resident preferences in certain programs )  by Admin003 on May 8, 2009 

 


Senator Switalski asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the statement be printed in the Journal.


The motion prevailed.


Senator Switalski’s statement is as follows:


It feels like Groundhog Day up here. My amendment is similar to those offered by Senators Gleason, Olshove, Whitmer, Anderson, and others. I must admit that I am intrigued by the (S-1) border county provision. Its intent is the annexation of Indiana and Ohio. It would fit into the broad parameters of my ultimate goal—world domination. In particular, I have always lusted after the Toledo strip. Unfortunately, the substitute does not formally incorporate Indiana and Ohio into Michigan’s borders. Therefore, it is inferior to my amendment which promotes Michigan workers.


As to those who plan to become residents, I have planned to be good many times, but the record shows that my good intentions have paved the road to Hell, Michigan. It is a very nice town, and you should visit some time.


I ask members to adopt my amendment and protect Michigan workers when it is their own tax dollars that are paying for the business incentives.


Reply

Line

2) 2009 Senate Bill 295 (Require citizenship/resident preferences in certain programs )  by admin on January 1, 2001 
Introduced in the Senate on March 3, 2009

The vote was 37 in favor, 0 opposed and 0 not voting

(Senate Roll Call 159 at Senate Journal 0)

Click here to view bill details.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation