

I support everything accept the new building. At this point in our State's history, we must side on sensibility and not with the next biggest think that catches our fancy. I vote yes on this bill with the ammendment to exclude language of the 100 million dollar new MSP Headquarters. We can use that extra money to further equip of men and women who go to work to protect Michigan everyday.
Ed Spillers
Clawson, MI
![]()
I wholeheartedly agree with all of Rep. Agema's reasons for non-support. The construction of this building was an insane project. If the developer has any conscience at all, he should sell this building to someone else, and have some pride in his state and it's economy. What does it take for people to do the RIGHT thing? I do not understand the sense of stripping funds for law enforcement and paying millions for a building that is not needed and was constructed with many faults.
![]()
Rep. Agema, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:
“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
Although I support many programs in this budget, I voted against it because it includes funding for a new $100 million headquarters. I cannot justify spending this amount of money at a time when the state $1.7 billion budget shortfall and the governor recently laid off 100 state troopers to save money.
In my view, it is extremely irresponsible to spend taxpayer dollars on a new state police headquarters when the governor is letting out prisoners early and just fired 100 state troopers to save money.
Leasing the new headquarters will cost the state more than $100 million over the next 25 years. The lease on the current MSP headquarters only costs $1 per year and doesn’t expire until 2030.
The current headquarters, while in need of repair, is fully functional and structurally sound. Michigan State University has even considered moving its own police force into the building if the state decides to vacate.
In addition to cost concerns, the site of the new headquarters has also been criticized for being too small. The site does not have room for an emergency operations center, garage space to warehouse vehicles, or a helipad. It is also partially located in a floodplain.
Michigan’s attorney general recently ruled that the contract as written allows the state to get out of the lease if the Legislature does not appropriate funding for it.
My goal is to balance the state budget without raising taxes while still providing enough funds to protect essential services. Nowhere in that equation is there room for a new $100 million building that we do not need and cannot afford.
For these reasons, I cannot support this bill at this time.”
![]()