Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2009 House Resolution 25

[Comments on this legislation] [Post new comment] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

Most Recent Comments

1) Re: 2009 House Resolution 25 [by crazycajun on February 19, 2009]

 it's funny that the fairness doctrine was the greatest thing since sliced bread in the eyes of the left just a few short months ago.


now they wish it would just fade away.


Reply

Line

2) Re: 2009 House Resolution 25 [by SaneMichigander on February 19, 2009]



Unfortunately, the way we measure “fairness” in media is in
terms of “equal time” or “equal space” given to opposing viewpoints.


 


This leaves little or no time or space for genuinely
reflective exposition of issues and proposed approaches to resolving them.  It gives rise to the meaningless “sound
bite,” and meaningless coverage of political issues as horse races (“so-and-so
is ahead at the clubhouse turn”) and "now I gotcha" coverage rather than coverage of substance.


 


Unfortunately, the most valuable viewpoints in dealing with
complex issues tend to be those that are themselves somewhat complex to one
degree and another.  That doesn’t
make them “fussy” or “pretentious,” or necessarily impossible to understand.  It does make many of them realistic
ways of looking at real problems. 


 


Unfortunately, real analytical work that helps sort the
wheat from the chaff as a prelude to presenting a genuinely fair picture in
public affairs reporting takes time, study, experience, and intellectual vigor.  With reporting staffs being constantly
cut, newsroom wages stagnated, and advertising time and space sales people
under incredible duress these days, media managers quietly embrace simplistic
approaches to fairness and call it good.


 


We all would be better served if the “fairness doctrine”
just faded away. 




 


Reply

Line

3) Re: 2009 House Resolution 25 [by crazycajun on February 19, 2009]

 the 'fairness doctrine' was a GREAT idea when democrats proposed it and got it passed during the clinton administration. but now that it's being used AGAINST democrats, it's terrible.


the same law that was meant to STIFLE free speech in the form of talk radio is now helping to RESTORE free speech in the form of talk radio, and the government did it to itself.


instead of leaving it alone and waiting for it to go away, the democrats did what they always do, and wrote another law. now that law has come around to bite them on the hind end, and they wish they had never done it.


laws that interfere with freedoms interfere with everyone's freedoms. but at least now the left is being paid back in kind for the kinds of useless, wastful shenanigans they pulled for decades.


Reply

Line


View Full Conversation