Introduced
by
To give local governments the power to enter deals with private property owners to spend money on improvements to public infrastructure facilities and amenities, including public transportation facilities. The money would come from “captured” increases in property tax values under a tax increment financing arrangement, special assessments (property taxes levied in a particular section of a taxing jurisdiction, state or federal grants or loans, and more.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance as previously described.
The substitute failed by voice vote
Substitute offered
by
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises various details, but does not change its substance. This version was subsequently superseded by another substitute with more changes.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require projects funded by the proposed program to abide by the state "prevailing wage" and other laws, even if no federal funds are used (which would automatically subject the project to the federal version. "Prevailing wage" laws prohibit awarding government contracts to contractors who submit the lowest bid unless the contractor pays union pay scales.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 93 to 4 (details)
To give local governments the power to enter deals with private property owners to spend money on improvements to public infrastructure facilities and amenities, including public transportation facilities. The money would come from “captured” increases in property tax values under a tax increment financing arrangement, special assessments (property taxes levied in a particular section of a taxing jurisdiction, state or federal grants or loans, and more.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation
Passed in the Senate 35 to 0 (details)
Motion to reconsider
by
The vote by which the bill was passed.
The motion passed by voice vote
Received
Amendment offered
by
To require public hearings on the local tax "capture" schemes.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
To give local governments the power to enter deals with private property owners to spend money on improvements to public infrastructure facilities and amenities, including public transportation facilities. The money would come from “captured” increases in property tax values under a tax increment financing arrangement, special assessments (property taxes levied in a particular section of a taxing jurisdiction, state or federal grants or loans, and more.
Passed in the House 89 to 8 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
