Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2009 House Bill 4061: Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )  by polarbear on May 10, 2011 

South Dakota grandparents rights serves the best interest of the children-  In 25-4-52 25-4-54 laws


AMEND ADOPTION CODE LAWS OF MICHIGAN   ADD ON TO 710.56 (6)


(6) EXCEPT IF A CHILD IS ADOPTED BY A MATERNAL OR PATERNAL GRANDPARENT, THIS DOES NOT PROHIBIT EITHER GRANDPARENT IN THE 1ST. DEGREE TO PETITION FOR VISITATION OF GRANDCHILD.


THIS NEW LAW WILL, BENIFIT THE CHILDREN- AND STATE, IT WILL GIVE CHILDREN LOVING BOND, MONEY WISE IT WILL SAVE STATE MILLION OF DOLLARES, KEEP CHILDREN OUT OF ,FOSTER CARE, AND DANGERS. MANY STATES HAVE CHANGED THEIR ADOPTION CODES TO ADD-ON AMENDMENTS TO EQUAL RIGHTS TO BOTH GRANDPARENTS.


MICHIGAN FAILED TO PASS A A CORRECT LAW- THEY VOTED -JUST TO GET IT DONE- GOVERNOR SIGN IT - PROBABLY DIDNOT READ IT- THIS NEW LAW WE IN "NO WAY" INPUT INTO "PARENTS RIGHTS" AND IT DID NOT DO SO IN 2003, BUT CONGRESS JUST SIMPLY LEFT OUT THE PART- SMALL PRINT OF WORDS OF """EXCEPT IF A  CHILD IS ADOPTED BY GRANDPARENT THIS DOES NOT PROHIBIT VISITATION OF A GRANDPARENTS"" THE WORD EXCEPT"" HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH PARENTS RIGHTS.


GRANDPARENTS ALL OVER T UNITED STATES- AARP- VETERANS- SUPPORTED THE "'EXCEPT IF ADOPTED BY GRANDPARENTS.


WE AS GRANPARENTS ARE BEING UNITED ONCE AGAIN TO DEMAND "CONGRESS" IN EVERY STATE" TO REWRITE ADOPTION CODE LAWS- """ AMEND ADOPTION CODE- "EXCEPT IF A CHILD IS ADOPTED BY A MATERNAL OR PATERNAL GRANDPARENT THIS DOES NOT PROHIBIT VISITATION BY EITHER GRANDPARENT IN THE 1ST.DEGREE.""


 


 


Reply

Line

2) Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )  by adam1230 on December 13, 2010 


Hi Friend,
It is a great blog, all the pictures are really amazing, it shows the professionalism in photography.


===========chocolate


 


Reply

Line

3) Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )  by suckingusdry on December 12, 2010 

 Lenawee county said if I sign as father and he was not mine it would be like an adoption! I would have to pay reguardless of a later test.  That would make me pay for someone elses kid.  Thats $100,000 plus that was not my debt.  The reason that this has not passed is it creates more Government.  We know its wrong but they (govt) dont care.  How can they charge you in Ohio etc. for a driving offence because it happened there(that makes since) but then make you repay in michigan again for the same offence.  Thats double jeperty.  One crime charged twice! Its wrong but it makes them MONEY !!! So they will not fix it.  Same goes with this.


Reply

Line


View Full Conversation