Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2008 House Bill 6118 (Revise government pension management details )

[Comments on this legislation] [Post new comment] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

Most Recent Comments

1) It's Good To See [by Anonymous Citizen on June 9, 2008]

Someone differentiate between public employee pensions and the pension and health benefits received by elected officials.

Anger and frustration that really is precipitated by elected officials should not inspire attacks directed at ordinary civil service employees as a class.
Reply

Line

2) No pension [by Anonymous Citizen on June 9, 2008]
How about prorating legislative pensions and health care benefits for the years they actually worked? They are not full time State employees, who have to work 10 years to be vested in the old days and 4 years to be vested now. Give them the same benefits as State workers. Why do they get better benefits for less time worked and less productivity?????
Reply

Line

3) Let's See [by Anonymous Citizen on June 8, 2008]

Because you feel like you have had a raw deal in the private sector, it's OK to back out on commitments made (in your name) to employees in the public sector.

In other words, you think giving someone else a good hard kick in the kajoobies is bound to make you feel a lot a better and solve all your own ills.

Here's some news for you.

Imposing hard breaks on some else who no more earned them than you did will not compensate you for your loss. Nor will it actually make you feel better, unless you are some kind of a sociopath.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation