Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 House Bill 5525: Mandate state power production decline
  1. Introduced by Rep. Kathy Angerer (D) on December 4, 2007, to mandate that electric utilities reduce the amount of energy they provide by 1 percent each year beginning in 2012, and 0.75 percent per year for natural gas utilities. Utilities that generated more than this amount would be required to pay an annual tax of two percent of the preceding year’s gross sales. To accomplish the reductions the utilities would be required to adopt programs that “target customer behavior, equipment, or devices without reducing the amount or quality of energy services.” Utilities would be allowed to charge higher rates to pay for these programs.
    • Referred to the House Energy and Technology Committee on December 4, 2007.
      • Reported in the House on January 24, 2008, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
    • Substitute offered in the House on April 17, 2008, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises the sanction for utilities tha don't meet the energy production reduction mandate. This version was bypassed for one that does the same and also revises various other details. The substitute failed by voice vote in the House on April 17, 2008.
    • Substitute offered by Rep. Kathy Angerer (D) on April 17, 2008, to replace the previous version with one that would give the Michigan Public Service Commission the authority to order a utility that does not meet the energy production reduction mandate to lower its prices, rather than imposing a new tax/penalty on the utility. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on April 17, 2008.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Phil Pavlov (R) on April 17, 2008, to prohibit a gas company from increasing rates to make up for revenue lost as a result of a decrease in energy consumption (and production) mandated by the bill. The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on April 17, 2008.
  2. Passed 81 to 18 in the House on April 17, 2008, to mandate that electric utilities reduce the amount of energy they provide by 1 percent each year beginning in 2012, and gas utitities reduce production by 0.75 percent per year. To accomplish this they would be required to charge higher rates to pay for programs that “target customer behavior, equipment, or devices without reducing the amount or quality of energy services.” Utilities that fell short of the energy production reduction mandates could potentially be ordered by the Public Service Commission to reduce their prices. See also House Bill 5525, which caps competition between electricity providers in Michigan.
    Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"

Comments

A step in the right direction for energy.  by Anonymous Citizen on June 20, 2008 
2007 House Bill 5525 (Mandate state power production decline ) (House Roll Call 303)

Passed in the House (81 to 18) on April 17, 2008, to mandate that electric utilities reduce the amount of energy they provide by 1 percent each year beginning in 2012, and gas utitities reduce production by 0.75 percent per year. To accomplish this they would be required to charge higher rates to pay for programs that “target customer behavior, equipment, or devices without reducing the amount or quality of energy services.” Utilities that fell short of the energy production reduction mandates could potentially be ordered by the Public Service Commission to reduce their prices. See also House Bill 5525, which caps competition between electricity providers in Michigan. [History, Amendments & Comments]

The vote was 81 in favor, 18 opposed, and 11 not voting
(House Roll Call 303 at House Journal 35)



[Comment on this vote | View others' comments]



Vote
Support
Oppose
Not Voting
Undecided
Legislators (Democrat)
93%
0%
6%

58 total votes

Legislators (Republican)
51%
34%
13%

52 total votes

Voters
100%
0%
0%

1 total vote



What do you think? Support Oppose Undecided (logon required)




The following legislators supported 2007 House Bill 5525 (Mandate state power production decline ):

Accavitti (D) Angerer (D) Ball (R) Bauer (D) Bieda (D) Booher (R)
Brown (D) Byrnes (D) Byrum (D) Calley (R) Caswell (R) Caul (R)
Cheeks (D) Clack (D) Clemente (D) Condino (D) Constan (D) Corriveau (D)
Coulouris (D) Cushingberry (D) Dean (D) Dillon (D) Donigan (D) Ebli (D)
Farrah (D) Gillard (D) Gonzales (D) Griffin (D) Hammel (D) Hammon (D)
Hansen (R) Hildenbrand (R) Hood (D) Hopgood (D) Horn (R) Hune (R)
Johnson (D) Jones, Rick (R) Jones, Robert (D) Knollenberg (R) Lahti (D) LaJoy (R)
Law, David (R) Law, Kathleen (D) LeBlanc (D) Leland (D) Lemmons (D) Lindberg (D)
Marleau (R) Mayes (D) McDowell (D) Meadows (D) Meisner (D) Melton (D)
Meltzer (R) Miller (D) Moore (R) Moss (R) Nofs (R) Opsommer (R)
Palsrok (R) Pastor (R) Pearce (R) Polidori (D) Proos (R) Rocca (R)
Sak (D) Shaffer (R) Sheltrown (D) Simpson (D) Smith, Alma (D) Smith, Virgil (D)
Spade (D) Tobocman (D) Vagnozzi (D) Valentine (D) Walker (R) Ward (R)
Warren (D) Wojno (D) Young (D)

The following legislators opposed 2007 House Bill 5525 (Mandate state power production decline ):

Acciavatti (R) Agema (R) Casperson (R) DeRoche (R) Elsenheimer (R) Emmons (R)
Green (R) Huizenga (R) Meekhof (R) Moolenaar (R) Nitz (R) Pavlov (R)
Robertson (R) Schuitmaker (R) Stahl (R) Stakoe (R) Steil (R) Wenke (R)

The following legislators did not vote on 2007 House Bill 5525 (Mandate state power production decline ):

Amos (R) Bennett (D) Brandenburg (R) Espinoza (D) Gaffney (R) Garfield (R)
Hoogendyk (R) Jackson (D) Palmer (R) Scott (D) Sheen (R)


"no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on April 20, 2008 
Rep. Agema, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

We are again asking rate payers to cough up more money for their energy based on a government mandate.”


Oh by the way ...  by Jennybegone on January 26, 2008 
Moleface, if you really want to take a stand against the oil companies, how about doing what former President Carter tried to to (and should have been allowed to do), which is to pass a windfall profits tax on the oil companies, which would not be allowed to be passed onto consumers. The money from that tax would be used to support alternative fuel sources and alternative energy production.

But then, moleface, you and your legislature are like a bunch of pigs at the public trough. You are all the worst bunch of incompetent, self-serving losers in state history.

View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.