Introduced by Sen. Gerald Van Woerkom (R) on October 18, 2007, to revise a law that allows a school district to offer part of its curricula to a private school or home-schooled student, including at a non-public school location. Under current law, nonessential elective courses can be offered by the school district within whose jurisdiction the student resides, or by a contiguous district under a cooperative agreement with permission of the home-district. The bill would change this to establish that if the home district cannot or will not provide all or some of the instruction, a contiguous district may do even if there is no cooperative agreement and no release by the home district.
Referred to the Senate Education Committee on October 18, 2007.
Reported in the Senate on February 19, 2008, with the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on February 21, 2008, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on February 21, 2008.
Referred to the House Education Committee on February 26, 2008.
Reported in the House on June 17, 2008, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on June 26, 2008, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that requires that requests from and responses to those seeking instruction from a public school district be submitted annually in writing. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on June 26, 2008.
Passed 106 to 0 in the House on June 26, 2008, to revise a law that allows a school district to offer part of its curricula to a private school or home-schooled student, including at a non-public school location. Under current law, nonessential elective courses can be offered by the school district within whose jurisdiction the student resides, or by a contiguous district under a cooperative agreement with permission of the home-district. The bill would change this to establish that if the home district cannot or will not provide all or some of the instruction, a contiguous district may do even if there is no cooperative agreement and no release by the home district. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
1) Response to Co-mingling by Anonymous Citizen on September 4, 2008 This bill only opens up nonessential elective courses, not core curricula. A private school has enough struggles just to recruit and pay teachers for core curricula. There are often not enough students nor funds to outfit a marching band. A home-schooled child, who can not have a choir or band in his/her living room, can now have access to that specific type of instruction.
This legislation stops a local superintendent who is hostile towards non-public schools from blocking their access to OTHER schools outside of their district that may be friendly and more than willing to help those students. The true need is for legislation that forces the local school to allow the student into their class NO MATTER what. Those students pay taxes just like everyone else! Reply
2) Co-mingling by Anonymous Citizen on February 29, 2008 The idea of charter, voucher, private etc., was never about "separation", it is about "choice".
It appears that our legislature is thankfully continuing in that direction - "Power To The Parents"!!! Reply
3) to co-mingling by Anonymous Citizen on October 24, 2007 A couple of things to consider. I pay for public education now so I should be able to use whatever pieces I choose. From the sound of your post, it appears you don't think people should be able to choose how they educate their children. Do you think the government should choose for us? Reply