Introduced by Sen. Michael Switalski (D) on September 12, 2007, to allow counties to replace revenue ordinarily received from the state convention facility development fund and used for substance abuse treatment programs, with money from the “reserve funds” that were created as a replacement for state revenue sharing to counties, and which were funded by shifting forward the due-date for county tax collections imposed under Public Act 356 of 2004. These “reserve funds” and the property tax acceleration were part of a deal to avoid spending cuts in the Fiscal Year 2005-2006 budget. The liquor and hotel tax revenues convention facility development fund money is not available because it was taken in a “fund raid” as part of a deal to avoid spending cuts in the FY 2006-2007 budget. Money in the convention fund comes from liquor and hotel tax revenues that were supposed to pay for debt service on Cobo Hall and other municipal convention facilities.
Referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee on September 12, 2007.
Reported in the Senate on September 19, 2007, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee on September 24, 2007.
1) Big Money [by Anonymous Citizen on September 22, 2007] All the complaining about the budget, while school administrators made big paychecks this week! Reply
2) No [by Anonymous Citizen on September 21, 2007] No More.........we have had enough of your gimmicks and switches etc. You all should get jobs with a Carny, talking little kids out of their quarters Reply
3) No! [by Anonymous Citizen on September 17, 2007] Stop the switches, raids and accounting tricks. The original tax shift was an accounting trick to begin with. Now the state is taking even more money from local government rather than fixing the problems in Lansing! Stop it! All this means is that counties will run through that "restricted fund" faster. What heppens then? Will the legislature return revenue sharing to the counties? There's no one in Lansing who was around when revenue sharing was created. Local governments lost taxing authority to the state in exchange for revenue sharing. Supposedly, centralized collection would be more efficient. All that has happened is money that would have been spent locally is now being sent to Lansing. Into the bottomless pit! Reply