Introduced by Sen. Jud Gilbert (R) on May 10, 2007, to require the Department of Transportation to use road building material and technique life-cycle cost analyses from other states to determine the most cost effective pavement types, if there is no applicable historical data from Michigan.
Referred to the Senate Transportation Committee on May 10, 2007.
Reported in the Senate on June 11, 2008, with the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on June 17, 2008, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on June 17, 2008.
Referred to the House Transportation Committee on June 18, 2008.
Passed 108 to 0 in the House on December 18, 2008, to require the Department of Transportation to use road building material and technique life-cycle cost analyses from other states to determine the most cost effective pavement types, if there is no applicable historical data from Michigan. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on January 12, 2009.
1) Yes by Anonymous Citizen on May 15, 2007 I vote for common sense every time....that means, I guess, NO vote for most of the people in office in MI Reply
2) Common Sence vs Law by 56servi on May 15, 2007 If we need a law for the transportation dept to use data from other states when we don't ther data we should replace those people. We don't need laws to substuitute for good business practices.
IF our elected officals have time to work on this insteed of the budget problems, then they need to rethink their priorites Reply
3) 2007 Senate Bill 494 (Revise road life cycle analysis procedures ) by admin on January 1, 2001 Introduced in the Senate on May 10, 2007, to require the Department of Transportation to use road building material and technique life-cycle cost analyses from other states to determine the most cost effective pavement types, if there is no applicable historical data from Michigan
The vote was 37 in favor, 0 opposed and 1 not voting