Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 Senate Bill 406: Increase fishing license fees

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) the legislators have  by Anonymous Citizen on April 23, 2007 
proven time and again that they care not for history or tradition in this state. they could care less if anyone fishes or hunts or traps tommarow.

all they care about is continued spending. raising the license fee 100% will get them TWICE the money. they know that fishermen are going to spend money to fish. they DON'T know that the less affluent fishermen CAN'T spend any more to fish, so they may just have to STOP FISHING.

they don't care about YOU fishing, they care about YOU GIVING THEM MONEY.

if you are NOT the one GIVING THEM MONEY, they DON'T CARE ABOUT YOU.

they don't care a whole lot about the people who ARE giving them money.
Reply

Line

2) Higher License Fee?  by Anonymous Citizen on April 23, 2007 
We are very blessed in this great State of Michigan which offers such opportunities to teach our children to hunt, fish and enjoy the great outdoors. The economy isn't the best so why would you want to make it worse for the residents that may already be struggling? There may need to be a slight adjustment in license fees, but 100%? A little much don't you think? I am afraid the higher fees will deter some families from enjoying these activities. Teaching our children to respect our land and wildlife while they are young will have a lasting impression which will carry over into their adulthood.
Reply

Line

3) Brater = Tax Increase  by Mike Hignite on April 23, 2007 
I'm not sure she's ever met a tax she didn't like. Let people hunt and fish in peace.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation