Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 Senate Bill 379: Prohibit landlord entry without 24 notice or permission

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) A "Stupid" Law?  by Anonymous Citizen on August 7, 2007 
Why is it stupid? Because you will be inconvenienced as a landlord and not be able to intrude on the tenants with a knock? If a tenant can refuse entry, for ROUTINE maintenance, it gives them a bit of control. Already, landlords hold most of the cards in a landlord/tenant relationship. If you have a year lease, and the situation becomes such that you cannot comfortably stay (loud neighbors, for example), you must stick out your lease or pay for the time it takes to find a new tenant, as well as needing to often pay a percentage simply for breaking the lease.
It would be nice to have a little bit of the say in my OWN HOME as to who I have to admit, and when. There are times it is very inconvenient to have a landlord stop by. My friends and family call first, my landlord does not have to. That is just wrong.
Reply

Line

2) BS  by Anonymous Citizen on April 2, 2007 
This is just a feel good law with no benefits. Every maintenance entry will require landlords to have a signed authorization covering their butts. This is a waste of paper and time.
Reply

Line

3) This is not a stupid law, quit being a bully.  by Anonymous Citizen on March 30, 2007 
Sorry landlords. You've got more money and more influence, but this bill is the right thing to do.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation